CSNbbs

im just curious.....

This is a classic ESPN thread, looking forward to the far right peanut gallery to try and defend the likes of Mississippi and Alabama by claiming "they're beautiful states".

The real question is why are blue states so much gayer than red states?

At least Red States know how to spell red, and not read.

John have you been banned permanently at Hoopla yet? They gave me the perma-ban not too long ago...

I am like the boogie man at poopla. They hate me so much lol

Those low IQ states have enough smarts not to go broke. And freedom sites those low IQ states have much more freedom than the states with all the Ph.Ds. And if anything proves the high IQ states are actually mental cases just look who they vote for.

nah. i just dont like that board as much. this board is

more active
better layout
better posters
more variety
much better mods

This is all I am going to say on poopla because it's off topic.

I don't know why y'all even think about that place. This place is 1000x better.

Basing a state's performance on IQ is not a smart strategy by our liberal blue-staters suffering from inferiority complexes.

Red States have better economies, a lower cost of living, better food, hotter women and less crime. Surely someone with a high IQ could figure out how to run a better state. They can't. So, they flee their blue cesspool and infect red states with their blue state mentality.

(10-02-2013 10:05 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote: [ -> ]This is all I am going to say on poopla because it's off topic.

I don't know why y'all even think about that place. This place is 1000x better.

Basing a state's performance on IQ is not a smart strategy by our liberal blue-staters suffering from inferiority complexes.

Red States have better economies, a lower cost of living, better food, hotter women and less crime. Surely someone with a high IQ could figure out how to run a better state. They can't. So, they flee their blue cesspool and infect red states with their blue state mentality.

this is exactly what im talking about.......

Basing a state's performance on IQ is not a smart strategy by our liberal blue-staters suffering from inferiority complexes.
translation: he pulls the usual
"you cant use stats to judge our state" then pulls the "yall just jealous"


Red States have better economies
he starts out stating something flase.....

a lower cost of living
forgets to mention lower wages, infrastructure, education etc.

better food
something thats
1) not really true
2) opinion
3) red states have higher rates of heart attacks, diabetes, obesity etc.

less crime
states another false fact

(10-02-2013 09:51 PM)psualltheway5 Wrote: [ -> ]This is a classic ESPN thread, looking forward to the far right peanut gallery to try and defend the likes of Mississippi and Alabama by claiming "they're beautiful states".

It's not surprising that you called out two of the states with the largest black populations as undesirable. We don't have as many state-sponsored child rape rings as you do in Pennsylvania, but we get by.

Besides, these idiotic IQ by state studies are pointless unless you are comparing by who is voting Red/Blue in each state.

The answer should be obvious. Even though Dems in red states are in the minority our Dems are dumber than blue state dems thus they bring down the average.

(10-02-2013 10:15 PM)Clueless Economist Wrote: [ -> ]The answer should be obvious. Even though Dems in red states are in the minority our Dems are dumber than blue state dems thus they bring down the average.

yeah that totally makes logical sense!!!!!!!

not.........

(10-02-2013 10:11 PM)john01992 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-02-2013 10:05 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote: [ -> ]This is all I am going to say on poopla because it's off topic.

I don't know why y'all even think about that place. This place is 1000x better.

Basing a state's performance on IQ is not a smart strategy by our liberal blue-staters suffering from inferiority complexes.

Red States have better economies, a lower cost of living, better food, hotter women and less crime. Surely someone with a high IQ could figure out how to run a better state. They can't. So, they flee their blue cesspool and infect red states with their blue state mentality.

this is exactly what im talking about.......

Basing a state's performance on IQ is not a smart strategy by our liberal blue-staters suffering from inferiority complexes.
translation: he pulls the usual
"you cant use stats to judge our state" then pulls the "yall just jealous"


Red States have better economies
he starts out stating something flase.....

a lower cost of living
forgets to mention lower wages, infrastructure, education etc.

better food
something thats
1) not really true
2) opinion
3) red states have higher rates of heart attacks, diabetes, obesity etc.

less crime
states another false fact

I know you are just trolling, but I will refute for the benefit of other posters. All my claims are true. I'm sorry. You've been proven wrong countless times regarding all of them.

"Flase." Very subtle.

The obesity and heart attack rate is due to two factors. Better tasting food(people over eat) and they work and play much harder than people in blue states.

Why do Red states hang their hat on the whole "lower cost of living" idea?

(10-02-2013 10:14 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-02-2013 09:51 PM)psualltheway5 Wrote: [ -> ]This is a classic ESPN thread, looking forward to the far right peanut gallery to try and defend the likes of Mississippi and Alabama by claiming "they're beautiful states".

It's not surprising that you called out two of the states with the largest black populations as undesirable. We don't have as many state-sponsored child rape rings as you do in Pennsylvania, but we get by.

Besides, these idiotic IQ by state studies are pointless unless you are comparing by who is voting Red/Blue in each state.

I wasn't calling anyone out, the conservative peanut gallery consistently said those states were better than the likes of California, Pennsylvania, New York, etc.

(10-02-2013 10:35 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-02-2013 10:11 PM)john01992 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-02-2013 10:05 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote: [ -> ]This is all I am going to say on poopla because it's off topic.

I don't know why y'all even think about that place. This place is 1000x better.

Basing a state's performance on IQ is not a smart strategy by our liberal blue-staters suffering from inferiority complexes.

Red States have better economies, a lower cost of living, better food, hotter women and less crime. Surely someone with a high IQ could figure out how to run a better state. They can't. So, they flee their blue cesspool and infect red states with their blue state mentality.

this is exactly what im talking about.......

Basing a state's performance on IQ is not a smart strategy by our liberal blue-staters suffering from inferiority complexes.
translation: he pulls the usual
"you cant use stats to judge our state" then pulls the "yall just jealous"


Red States have better economies
he starts out stating something flase.....

a lower cost of living
forgets to mention lower wages, infrastructure, education etc.

better food
something thats
1) not really true
2) opinion
3) red states have higher rates of heart attacks, diabetes, obesity etc.

less crime
states another false fact

I know you are just trolling, but I will refute for the benefit of other posters. All my claims are true. I'm sorry. You've been proven wrong countless times regarding all of them.

"Flase." Very subtle.

The obesity and heart attack rate is due to two factors. Better tasting food(people over eat) and they work and play much harder than people in blue states.

no your idiotic claims are based on total stats and not per capita stats. but then when you want to argue stuff like GDP you will suddenly claim per capita matters

you are the biggest dumb*** i know

(10-02-2013 10:38 PM)psualltheway5 Wrote: [ -> ]Why do Red states hang their hat on the whole "lower cost of living" idea?

Youre kidding, right?

(10-02-2013 11:37 PM)smn1256 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-02-2013 10:38 PM)psualltheway5 Wrote: [ -> ]Why do Red states hang their hat on the whole "lower cost of living" idea?

Youre kidding, right?

No, clearly low cost of living means said place is undesirable...

(10-02-2013 11:56 PM)psualltheway5 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-02-2013 11:37 PM)smn1256 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-02-2013 10:38 PM)psualltheway5 Wrote: [ -> ]Why do Red states hang their hat on the whole "lower cost of living" idea?

Youre kidding, right?

No, clearly low cost of living means said place is undesirable...

To most people it would mean its not over priced.