...to see a flag coming in for pass interference.
Rolled into mine at 3:00. Woke up at 9:45 AM . Loosing while looking bad sucks! ( but not as bad as loosing when we should have won --- TROY for example ).
Don't loose heart, Blazerdawg
(09-29-2013 01:50 AM)FNblazer Wrote: [ -> ]...to see a flag coming in for pass interference.
Are you sure it wasn't for an ineligible wide receiver downfield?
I crawled into bed around 2:30.
(09-29-2013 01:28 PM)Marathon Blazer Wrote: [ -> ] (09-29-2013 01:50 AM)FNblazer Wrote: [ -> ]...to see a flag coming in for pass interference.
Are you sure it wasn't for an ineligible wide receiver downfield?
Yep. I saw that play. He was only 1 yard off the line, therefore ineligible.
That made me not so mad that he dropped a wide open TD...at least he was lined up wrong too.
My comment was sarcasm, even though it wasn't in blue.
Ha! Well I didn't notice it before the snap. I'll have to go back and see if he was truly ineligible. Normally you see that called on TEs.
(09-29-2013 02:52 PM)FNblazer Wrote: [ -> ]Ha! Well I didn't notice it before the snap. I'll have to go back and see if he was truly ineligible. Normally you see that called on TEs.
He wasn't enough "off the line". The commentators thought it was a ticky tack call also.
(09-29-2013 01:20 PM)BlazrDawg Wrote: [ -> ]Rolled into mine at 3:00. Woke up at 9:45 AM . Loosing while looking bad sucks! ( but not as bad as loosing when we should have won --- TROY for example ).
Too sleepy to spell
(09-29-2013 03:47 PM)BlazerFromMD Wrote: [ -> ] (09-29-2013 01:20 PM)BlazrDawg Wrote: [ -> ]Rolled into mine at 3:00. Woke up at 9:45 AM . Loosing while looking bad sucks! ( but not as bad as loosing when we should have won --- TROY for example ).
Too sleepy to spell
Damn, busted again, hahahaha.
(09-29-2013 03:12 PM)Blazer Engineer Wrote: [ -> ] (09-29-2013 02:52 PM)FNblazer Wrote: [ -> ]Ha! Well I didn't notice it before the snap. I'll have to go back and see if he was truly ineligible. Normally you see that called on TEs.
He wasn't enough "off the line". The commentators thought it was a ticky tack call also.
It was definitely ticky tack...but it's the responsibility of the receiver and not a wrong call
(09-29-2013 06:14 PM)LairDweller Wrote: [ -> ] (09-29-2013 03:12 PM)Blazer Engineer Wrote: [ -> ] (09-29-2013 02:52 PM)FNblazer Wrote: [ -> ]Ha! Well I didn't notice it before the snap. I'll have to go back and see if he was truly ineligible. Normally you see that called on TEs.
He wasn't enough "off the line". The commentators thought it was a ticky tack call also.
It was definitely ticky tack...but it's the responsibility of the receiver and not a wrong call
As long as they call it every single time on both teams.
(09-29-2013 08:03 PM)Smaug Wrote: [ -> ] (09-29-2013 06:14 PM)LairDweller Wrote: [ -> ] (09-29-2013 03:12 PM)Blazer Engineer Wrote: [ -> ] (09-29-2013 02:52 PM)FNblazer Wrote: [ -> ]Ha! Well I didn't notice it before the snap. I'll have to go back and see if he was truly ineligible. Normally you see that called on TEs.
He wasn't enough "off the line". The commentators thought it was a ticky tack call also.
It was definitely ticky tack...but it's the responsibility of the receiver and not a wrong call
As long as they call it every single time on both teams.
its just a very subjective call. I have a buddy who is a referee, who was just explaining this a couple of weeks ago.