CSNbbs

Full Version: Nick's Picks Results for Week #2
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
After going 11-2 last week, Nick’s Picks went 8-3 going 19-5 YTD. A few spot-on picks and one real head scratcher (Western Michigan).


Nick’s Pick: James Madison 27 – Akron 17
Actual Score: Akron 35 – JMU 33
Glad to wrong here, a nice win for the Zips; maybe there is hope…19K in attendance was nice too.

Nick’s Pick: BGSU 33 – Kent State 14
Actual Score: BGSU 41 – Kent State 22
Went as predicted.

Nick’s Pick: Baylor 44 – Buffalo 24
Actual Score: Baylor 70 – Buffalo 13
Went worse than predicted.

Nick’s Pick: Kentucky 38 – Miami 17
Actual Score: Kentucky 41 – Miami 7
Went as predicted.

Nick’s Pick: Ohio 24 – North Texas 20
Actual Score: Ohio 27 – North Texas 21
Went as predicted.

Nick’s Pick: UMass 20 – Maine 16
Actual Score: Maine 24 – UMass 14
Too bad for UMass, I thought Charlie could get this program going at a quicker pace.

Nick’s Pick: Ball State 41 – Army 23
Actual Score: Ball State 40 – Army 14
Went as predicted.

Nick’s Pick: Central 33 - New Hampshire 31
Actual Score: Central 24 - New Hampshire 21
Went as predicted.

Nick’s Pick: Penn State 45 – Eastern 16
Actual Score: Penn State 45 – Eastern 7
Went as predicted.

NIU 48 – Idaho 10
OK folks, I messed up here; this game is next week so we will keep this one archived and move it forward…

Nick’s Pick: Missouri 33 – Toledo 24
Actual Score: Missouri 38 – Toledo 23
Went as predicted.

Nick’s Pick: Western 55 – Nichols St 13
Actual Score: Nichols St 27 – Western 23
Totally flabbergasted by this result…did not see this coming at all.
PJ Fleck laid an egg. In front of a home crowd of 24,300 too.

UMass should be traded to the SBC for 5 million dollars and a player to be named later.
(09-08-2013 03:44 PM)Kittonhead Wrote: [ -> ]PJ Fleck laid an egg. In front of a home crowd of 24,300 too.

UMass should be traded to the SBC for 5 million dollars and a player to be named later.

LOL. There have been those who have advocated UMass to the Belt. 1) It gives the Belt 12 teams
2) It allows UMass to keep their other sports in the Atlantic 10
3) It evens out the MAC to 12 teams.

I really don't want UMass in the Belt (I didn't want Idaho either - they're not a fit either - Id rather wait for Missouri State James Madison etc to move up), and I don't think that UMass wants to play in the Belt either, but jus' sayin', what you are throwin' out there isn't crazy.
(09-08-2013 05:06 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-08-2013 03:44 PM)Kittonhead Wrote: [ -> ]PJ Fleck laid an egg. In front of a home crowd of 24,300 too.

UMass should be traded to the SBC for 5 million dollars and a player to be named later.

LOL. There have been those who have advocated UMass to the Belt. 1) It gives the Belt 12 teams
2) It allows UMass to keep their other sports in the Atlantic 10
3) It evens out the MAC to 12 teams.

I really don't want UMass in the Belt (I didn't want Idaho either - they're not a fit either - Id rather wait for Missouri State James Madison etc to move up), and I don't think that UMass wants to play in the Belt either, but jus' sayin', what you are throwin' out there isn't crazy.

Exactly.
Reference URL's