CSNbbs

What happened to UTEP's policy of allowing students to purchase tickets at a discounted rate?

Call 747-5324 and ask.

the students get a free ticket you cheap ass

When I went to school, we would get a free ticket and we could also purchase tickets at a discount.

I'm not a cheap ass. I just don't want to pay extra if I don't have to. I'm already paying thousands of dollars for my child's tuition. I just want to know if they still offer that perk for students.

Thanks for the number. I was planning to call but just wanted to see if anyone in here had information.

(09-04-2013 09:27 AM)zyxwvutsru Wrote: [ -> ]Call 747-5324 and ask.

That is not a working number

(09-04-2013 12:07 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-04-2013 09:27 AM)zyxwvutsru Wrote: [ -> ]Call 747-5324 and ask.

That is not a working number

weird. worked for me.

(09-04-2013 05:12 PM)zyxwvutsru Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-04-2013 12:07 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-04-2013 09:27 AM)zyxwvutsru Wrote: [ -> ]Call 747-5324 and ask.

That is not a working number

weird. worked for me.

Did you dial 505 fit?

You can take the aggie out of nm but...

(09-04-2013 05:12 PM)zyxwvutsru Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-04-2013 12:07 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-04-2013 09:27 AM)zyxwvutsru Wrote: [ -> ]Call 747-5324 and ask.

That is not a working number

weird. worked for me.

Called that number and all I got was a fax machine. Called this number ...915) 747-6150 and got through right away.

Students get up to three tickets at 12 dollars a pop.

Thanks for the info.

(09-04-2013 12:06 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not a cheap ass.

I just don't want to pay extra if I don't have to.

There you go again, contradicting yourself.

(09-05-2013 07:00 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-04-2013 12:06 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not a cheap ass.

I just don't want to pay extra if I don't have to.

There you go again, contradicting yourself.

Really? How so?

I was asking a question based on the original information I had received.

I don't think it is a contradiciton if you ask a question.

But hey. It's obvious I'm held to a much higher standard than everyone else.

(09-05-2013 11:33 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-05-2013 07:00 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-04-2013 12:06 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not a cheap ass.

I just don't want to pay extra if I don't have to.

There you go again, contradicting yourself.

Really? How so?

I was asking a question based on the original information I had received.

I don't think it is a contradiciton if you ask a question.

But hey. It's obvious I'm held to a much higher standard than everyone else.

So you're going to pull the victim card now?

The thread started with a question but as always your trollish ways got the best of you. RUN was referencing the specific quote where you contradict yourself.

(09-06-2013 07:04 AM)gcp_mineros Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-05-2013 11:33 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-05-2013 07:00 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-04-2013 12:06 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not a cheap ass.

I just don't want to pay extra if I don't have to.

There you go again, contradicting yourself.

Really? How so?

I was asking a question based on the original information I had received.

I don't think it is a contradiciton if you ask a question.

But hey. It's obvious I'm held to a much higher standard than everyone else.

So you're going to pull the victim card now?

The thread started with a question but as always your trollish ways got the best of you. RUN was referencing the specific quote where you contradict yourself.

I'm not complaining.

It's just increasingly obvious that all most everyone in here is attacking my on the smallest details of my posts and not really addressing the topic at hand.

Fit, do you honestly believe that we are collectively against you and your posts have nothing to do with it? You have repeatedly stated to "embrace debate" and when the discussion doesn't lean in favor of your opinion you change the the argument. This "nitpicking" nonsense is your latest attempt at distracting from the discussion. Your opinion will be better received if there was ever any legitimate logic or rational.

(09-06-2013 06:41 PM)gcp_mineros Wrote: [ -> ]Fit, do you honestly believe that we are collectively against you and your posts have nothing to do with it? You have repeatedly stated to "embrace debate" and when the discussion doesn't lean in favor of your opinion you change the the argument. This "nitpicking" nonsense is your latest attempt at distracting from the discussion. Your opinion will be better received if there was ever any legitimate logic or rational.

I'm not looking for people to lean in my favor. I'm simply expecting people to have a discussion about the topic.

I don't wish to nitpick about weather or not I contridicted myself in this thread.

I wish to get to the bottom of whether or not UTEP has changed their ticket policies.

You contradict yourself time and again.

Either you don't see it, or you claim not to see it (but do).
Anyway, you worry about paying a couple of extra bucks for a game, and you say you're not a cheap ass. DUH!!!! That's what a cheap ass is.

As for debate. Sure it's good to debate when you have pro and against arguments with regards to the UTEP or Triple A team. The problem is that you are against everything that is UTEP or Triple A.
- You want the best coaches, but don't want to pay a few extra bucks for tix.
- You want to be treated as an equal Miner fan, but act like an Aggie
- You want to be on the CUSA board, with PAC12 plastered on your profile
- You want to say you're a Miner fan, but blast UTEP every chance you get
- You want to a fair shake in a discussion, but you post trollish threads with repetitive topics so you can make a point.

See a pattern here? NO? OK, then allow me to give you this gift....

(09-07-2013 01:38 AM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote: [ -> ]You contradict yourself time and again.

Either you don't see it, or you claim not to see it (but do).
Anyway, you worry about paying a couple of extra bucks for a game, and you say you're not a cheap ass. DUH!!!! That's what a cheap ass is.

As for debate. Sure it's good to debate when you have pro and against arguments with regards to the UTEP or Triple A team. The problem is that you are against everything that is UTEP or Triple A.
- You want the best coaches, but don't want to pay a few extra bucks for tix.
- You want to be treated as an equal Miner fan, but act like an Aggie
- You want to be on the CUSA board, with PAC12 plastered on your profile
- You want to say you're a Miner fan, but blast UTEP every chance you get
- You want to a fair shake in a discussion, but you post trollish threads with repetitive topics so you can make a point.

See a pattern here? NO? OK, then allow me to give you this gift....

100% incorrect.

1. I have never said that I want the best coaches. I have always said that I want young coaches who want to prove themselves and therefore do not require top dollar.

2. Many people on this forum root for multiple teams. That you make this an issue simply speaks to your bias.

3. I do not blast UTEP. If you believe that I do then I challenge you to post evidence.

4. You claim I post trollish thread but you only percieve them that way because you can't handle constructive criticism.

Charge fit double!!!!

(09-09-2013 12:12 AM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]100% incorrect.

1. I have never said that I want the best coaches. I have always said that I want young coaches who want to prove themselves and therefore do not require top dollar.

2. Many people on this forum root for multiple teams. That you make this an issue simply speaks to your bias.

3. I do not blast UTEP. If you believe that I do then I challenge you to post evidence.

4. You claim I post trollish thread but you only percieve them that way because you can't handle constructive criticism.

1. You said younger coaches who can outperform Floyd. Wouldn't that mean better coaches?
2. You're an Aggie. Nothing wrong with that. But this isn't their board.
3. You do blast (criticize) UTEP. You state by your own admission that you do it to stimulate discussion.....which is trolling in most folks' book.
4 You post thread after thread over the same topic. But only when you're in a position to criticize or antagonize. This defines a troll.

(09-09-2013 11:12 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-09-2013 12:12 AM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]100% incorrect.

1. I have never said that I want the best coaches. I have always said that I want young coaches who want to prove themselves and therefore do not require top dollar.

2. Many people on this forum root for multiple teams. That you make this an issue simply speaks to your bias.

3. I do not blast UTEP. If you believe that I do then I challenge you to post evidence.

4. You claim I post trollish thread but you only percieve them that way because you can't handle constructive criticism.

1. You said younger coaches who can outperform Floyd. Wouldn't that mean better coaches?
2. You're an Aggie. Nothing wrong with that. But this isn't their board.
3. You do blast (criticize) UTEP. You state by your own admission that you do it to stimulate discussion.....which is trolling in most folks' book.
4 You post thread after thread over the same topic. But only when you're in a position to criticize or antagonize. This defines a troll.

1. I don't think I ever said that but the there are young coaches out there that are better than Floyd. Most people would agree with that. Except maybe you.

2. I'm not an Aggie. I've never been one. To use that as a response is pathetic and childish to say the least.

3. I give constructive criticism. Which is to say I comment on things that they can improve. Only homers such as yourself cannot see that.

4. I've come to the conclusion that what defines a troll according to you and other homers is anyone who expects more from their university.