CSNbbs

I would be surprised if the ACC elects NOT to pursue one. It may be hard, no doubt, but with the experience people acquired with the start up of the B1G and the PAC12 networks, I'm sure the ACC could poach a couple of the middle management types who cut their teeth on the other conference channels.

I thought all of you guaranteed me a network was practically already agreed upon and ready to be announced...months ago.

(08-01-2013 01:29 PM)Marge Schott Wrote: [ -> ]I thought all of you guaranteed me a network was practically already agreed upon and ready to be announced...months ago.

It is.

(08-01-2013 11:52 AM)CardinalJim Wrote: [ -> ]Andy Bitter

Nice find Jim. Thanks for posting.

Are they including NYC in counting New York as an ACC market?

With a TV network there's no reason the ACC couldn't distribute an additional $5 million at least in revenue every year to each team. That would give everybody $25 million which would be on par with the other leagues.

(08-02-2013 12:16 PM)gocards#1 Wrote: [ -> ]With a TV network there's no reason the ACC couldn't distribute an additional $5 million at least in revenue every year to each team. That would give everybody $25 million which would be on par with the other leagues.

Might take several years to even begin to approach $5M. Not sure. But I think it'd put the ACC at or better than the Big 12 and Pac 12. I don't think that's on par with what the Big Ten or SEC will be making at that time.

(08-01-2013 01:34 PM)curtis0620 Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-01-2013 01:29 PM)Marge Schott Wrote: [ -> ]I thought all of you guaranteed me a network was practically already agreed upon and ready to be announced...months ago.

It is.

And like I said, that's what many on here were saying months ago. At this point it seems like it's fairly obvious that's factually incorrect.