CSNbbs

That got off to a rough start.

At the 4:00 mark when Bobby said "and again Nick, turning a negative into a positive, because that seems like that's what you want to talk about here today...."

Was he saying that Nick wanted to talk about negatives, or was he saying that Nick wanted to talk about negatives turning into positives?

99% sure he was saying Nick wanted to focus on the negatives. Which he certainly did to that point in the interview. That was funny. BW is a boss.

Nick Cattles sucks.

(07-31-2013 01:46 AM)Fatalisk Wrote: [ -> ]At the 4:00 mark when Bobby said "and again Nick, turning a negative into a positive, because that seems like that's what you want to talk about here today...."

Was he saying that Nick wanted to talk about negatives, or was he saying that Nick wanted to talk about negatives turning into positives?

99% sure he was saying Nick wanted to focus on the negatives. Which he certainly did to that point in the interview. That was funny. BW is a boss.

I noticed that too. You don't hear BW get irritated much. I think the question that got to him was Nick pushing for more information on the Tyree Lee situation.

Yeah, sounds like he's been asked a 100 times and was tired of people pushing after he's attempted to be clear he won't discuss it. Otherwise he was just doing his job, even though I'm not a huge fan of Cattles.

We're lucky to have a coach who does a near-flawless job when talking to the press. Total package

As for Cattles, come on, man. Show some professionalism. This isn't the NFL we're talking about.

I dont see where Cattles went wrong? He asked a few questions and then said "fair enough" and moved on....It's not like he tried to demand anything out of BW. We had a few negatives that needed addressing this week (Charlotte game and Lee). It was a good interview in my opinion.

Agreed, 2010, and to put it in its most basic element, Bobby, you're getting paid to go on the radio, the least you can do is answer a couple of questions that aren't BJs. Cattles had to ask, he did, and he didn't push it. Maybe Bobby should get some sleep, little things wouldn't irritate him so much. . . Of course, this is the same guy who thought Rich Radford asked "tough" questions. #delusional

I agree with 2010, but unlike JS, I saw nothing wrong with the way Wilder responded either. Cattles did what he was supposed to in asking, and Wilder did what he was supposed by not getting pressed into discussing the particulars of Lee's suspension. No big deal here, but I still don't care for Cattles.

Yeah, Cattles has to ask. If you don't like him, you don't like him, but he has to ask that question.

I thought Wilder handled it well. What good does disclosing what Lee did do? He's trying to protect his players and if there are some egg on his face by refusing to answer that, then so be it.

At least he asks. Applaud both sides, here.