CSNbbs

http://www.mwcboard.com/index.php?showtopic=45200

Tallgrass Pinciples of life:

1. Past is prologue.

2. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

Take that with a boulder of salt.

Sigh.....Tallgrass come up with something positive about the BE situation and report back....soon.

(01-04-2013 01:48 PM)RIFRAF Wrote: [ -> ]Sigh.....Tallgrass come up with something positive about the BE situation and report back....soon.

If he did a majority of this board would keel over from shock and surprise.

(01-04-2013 01:39 PM)OldGoldnBlue Wrote: [ -> ]Take that with a boulder of salt.

Your salt, dude...

(01-04-2013 01:58 PM)bitcruncher Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-04-2013 01:39 PM)OldGoldnBlue Wrote: [ -> ]Take that with a boulder of salt.

Your salt, dude...

Since salt is a preservative, could you have this delivered to Nbe headquarters in Providence?

You got some Eucs to use?

(01-04-2013 02:52 PM)Tallgrass Wrote: [ -> ]Since salt is a preservative, could you have this delivered to Nbe headquarters in Providence?

(01-04-2013 02:46 PM)Tallgrass Wrote: [ -> ]I don't tick off people on this board because I am hateful.

You fail.

In just the past six weeks he had gone from:

GT and UVA to Big10 by the end of November
to
UVA and NC to Big10
and now
GT and NC to Big10

Wasn't this the guy who was busted on the WVU board - or maybe Louisville - for creating multiple handles from different schools and then corroborating his own rumors as things they had heard from their insiders as well?

That is beyond desperate. It's flat out sad.

Anyway, at some point someone exposed the lunatic as a fraud and, faced with no other choice, he admitted to all of it and said it was all in good fun.

What's that about past being prologue and fools and whatnot?

Why people continue to listen to all of these sore-arsed, agenda-driven WVU nuts is completely beyond me? I guess it just proves that people tend to believe what they want to believe.

Yup...the B1G is going to do all this while @ the same time working on issues with TV Providers in the NYC/Beltway Markets...they some "busy" boys in Chicago...

Doesn't make much sense to me that UNC and UVa would be first out the door of the acc. I think its all a big bluff to get ND to join.

(01-04-2013 04:13 PM)bluesox Wrote: [ -> ]Doesn't make much sense to me that UNC and UVa would be first out the door of the acc. I think its all a big bluff to get ND to join.

No B1G expansion going forward really makes sense with either UT-Austin or Notre Dame. Maryland & Rutgers while good gets are not gamechangers...Delaney is into gamechangers/brands like Nebraska.

(01-04-2013 04:10 PM)Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Wrote: [ -> ]I guess it just proves that people tend to believe what they want to believe.

You mean you've only just NOW figured this out?

(01-04-2013 04:10 PM)Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Wrote: [ -> ]Wasn't this the guy who was busted on the WVU board - or maybe Louisville - for creating multiple handles from different schools and then corroborating his own rumors as things they had heard from their insiders as well?

That is beyond desperate. It's flat out sad.

Anyway, at some point someone exposed the lunatic as a fraud and, faced with no other choice, he admitted to all of it and said it was all in good fun.

What's that about past being prologue and fools and whatnot?

Why people continue to listen to all of these sore-arsed, agenda-driven WVU nuts is completely beyond me? I guess it just proves that people tend to believe what they want to believe.

Maybe Tallgrass is really mchiver3 or the Dude. He is about as credible.

IF were going with crazy theory, A game change for the big 10 could be Kentucky. If the big 10 really wants to think big, just jump to 40. In that case, you can put the original big 10 back to a 10 team division + have 3 other divisions of 10. Or they could go to 60 and run everything. Instead of an NCAA hoop tourney, it would be the big 10 tourney, i'm sure the numbers guys would say it would work great, tradition, who cares would be the PR, its $.

He also says MWC is going to "double down" on Uconn & Cincy and that the ACC is offering Uconn & Cincy football only, with provisions to add all sports in the future.

This guy has more connections than AT&T!

(01-04-2013 03:06 PM)PlainTiger Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-04-2013 02:52 PM)Tallgrass Wrote: [ -> ]Since salt is a preservative, could you have this delivered to Nbe headquarters in Providence?

(01-04-2013 02:46 PM)Tallgrass Wrote: [ -> ]I don't tick off people on this board because I am hateful.

You fail.

Its OldGoldnblue and Bitcruncher's fault. I am totally innocent.

(01-04-2013 04:28 PM)bluesox Wrote: [ -> ]IF were going with crazy theory, A game change for the big 10 could be Kentucky. If the big 10 really wants to think big, just jump to 40. In that case, you can put the original big 10 back to a 10 team division + have 3 other divisions of 10. Or they could go to 60 and run everything. Instead of an NCAA hoop tourney, it would be the big 10 tourney, i'm sure the numbers guys would say it would work great, tradition, who cares would be the PR, its $.

Kentucky? I think not. The B1G will poach the SEC when pigs fly.