CSNbbs

Full Version: "several conferences" are opposed to GT getting the waiver
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
From E$PN. Hopefully this keeps the NCAA from granting GT a waiver. It seems obvious that the MAC is one of these conference.

Quote:Industry sources told ESPN that "several conferences" are opposed to Georgia Tech getting the waiver, because it would take away a bowl spot from an eligible 6-6 team.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...-seminoles
If the waiver was granted and UConn and Pitt become eligible, it would take a bid from either an 8-4 BG or 8-4 OU.
(11-26-2012 05:43 PM)Falcon1407 Wrote: [ -> ]If the waiver was granted and UConn and Pitt become eligible, it would take a bid from either an 8-4 BG or 8-4 OU.



Maybe, but it could be 7-5 Western Kentucky.
(11-26-2012 10:25 PM)DICK Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-26-2012 05:43 PM)Falcon1407 Wrote: [ -> ]If the waiver was granted and UConn and Pitt become eligible, it would take a bid from either an 8-4 BG or 8-4 OU.



Maybe, but it could be 7-5 Western Kentucky.

73 eligible teams would mean, Central Michigan, Western Kentucky, and either BG or OU.
I'm starting to wonder If 10-2 SJST gets bid
Besides WKU (7-5), a second Sun Belt team would also be sweating it out should GaTech, Pitt, & UConn all become eligible.

ULMonroe (8-4)
MTSU/Ark St loser (8-4)

Edit: ULaLa is in. They took full advantage of being close to NOLA.
(11-27-2012 10:41 AM)Okie Chippewa Wrote: [ -> ]Besides WKU (7-5), a second Sun Belt team would also be sweating it out should GaTech, Pitt, & UConn all become eligible.

ULaLa (8-4 or 7-5)
ULMonroe (8-4)
MTSU/Ark St loser (8-4)

La-Lafayette has already accepted a bid to New Orleans.
Reference URL's