10-29-2012, 12:46 PM
(10-29-2012 12:44 PM)perimeterpost Wrote: [ -> ]I've said before that usually you can divide the MAC into thirds and judge the strength of the conference by how those thirds are weighted. This year's cut looks like this-
top 4 teams- 30-4
middle 5 teams- 22-21
bottom 4 teams- 3-30
normally I would say we are having an average to below average season based on where the bulk of the teams are located but the top has been so strong that its been one of the better ones. Will be interesting to see if the top stays strong will the bottom improve or will the middle weaken. Or do we start to see more of a divide from thirds to halves? If CMU and WMU continue to struggle this year and BSU, BGSU and Miami continue to gain it could be a split of 7 good, 6 bad.
what type of distribution of wins do you think is best for the conference?
Throw out UMass and see what it looks like.