CSNbbs

UL-Monroe is now playing on ESPN using two QBs in the back field. One left handed the other right handed. In the last two plays each threw a pass. Attn: Matt Campbell!

Speaking of 2 QB's. I think AD should get a LOT of PT tomorrow night. It wouldn't even bother me if he started. TO needs to get some reps for sure. But, we really do need to keep both QB's sharp.

(09-21-2012 08:45 PM)Toledo Football 1st Wrote: [ -> ]Speaking of 2 QB's. I think AD should get a LOT of PT tomorrow night. It wouldn't even bother me if he started. TO needs to get some reps for sure. But, we really do need to keep both QB's sharp.

I don't want to go back to the two QB system. I would really like to see UT light it up in the first half so that Dantin can play all of the second half. However, if Dantin gets hurt, UT could end up either burning Blackburn's redshirt or getting Gannon or Cole French some playing time. I'm secretly rooting for French to earn a scholarship btw.

(09-21-2012 09:12 PM)Campbell4President Wrote: [ -> ]I don't want to go back to the two QB system. I would really like to see UT light it up in the first half so that Dantin can play all of the second half. However, if Dantin gets hurt, UT could end up either burning Blackburn's redshirt or getting Gannon or Cole French some playing time. I'm secretly rooting for French to earn a scholarship btw.

I think, really, the scenario is the same if either AD or TO get hurt. If that should happen it rather sounds like Macon will be the backup. Next, I imagine whoever is the best among Blackburn/Gannon/French. TO will be a senior next year, so it s/b about time to be giving the QB of the future some reps. (We certainly don't want TO hurt in this game.)

(09-21-2012 10:24 PM)Toledo Football 1st Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-21-2012 09:12 PM)Campbell4President Wrote: [ -> ]I don't want to go back to the two QB system. I would really like to see UT light it up in the first half so that Dantin can play all of the second half. However, if Dantin gets hurt, UT could end up either burning Blackburn's redshirt or getting Gannon or Cole French some playing time. I'm secretly rooting for French to earn a scholarship btw.

I think, really, the scenario is the same if either AD or TO get hurt. If that should happen it rather sounds like Macon will be the backup. Next, I imagine whoever is the best among Blackburn/Gannon/French. TO will be a senior next year, so it s/b about time to be giving the QB of the future some reps. (We certainly don't want TO hurt in this game.)

Haha, good point about either getting hurt. Yeah, I'll just hope neither gets hurt then. ;-)

The poster known as Campbell4President would like to retract his previous post on the grounds that it is moronic.

(09-21-2012 10:45 PM)Campbell4President Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-21-2012 10:24 PM)Toledo Football 1st Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-21-2012 09:12 PM)Campbell4President Wrote: [ -> ]I don't want to go back to the two QB system. I would really like to see UT light it up in the first half so that Dantin can play all of the second half. However, if Dantin gets hurt, UT could end up either burning Blackburn's redshirt or getting Gannon or Cole French some playing time. I'm secretly rooting for French to earn a scholarship btw.

I think, really, the scenario is the same if either AD or TO get hurt. If that should happen it rather sounds like Macon will be the backup. Next, I imagine whoever is the best among Blackburn/Gannon/French. TO will be a senior next year, so it s/b about time to be giving the QB of the future some reps. (We certainly don't want TO hurt in this game.)

Haha, good point about either getting hurt. Yeah, I'll just hope neither gets hurt then. ;-)

The poster known as Campbell4President would like to retract his previous post on the grounds that it is moronic.

Try the EDIT button, Moron

(09-21-2012 10:45 PM)Campbell4President Wrote: [ -> ]Haha, good point about either getting hurt. Yeah, I'll just hope neither gets hurt then. ;-)

The poster known as Campbell4President would like to retract his previous post on the grounds that it is moronic.

Well, he has plenty of company here. But Hey, what's the Internet for if not for morons like us? Go Rockets!

(09-21-2012 08:45 PM)Toledo Football 1st Wrote: [ -> ]Speaking of 2 QB's. I think AD should get a LOT of PT tomorrow night. It wouldn't even bother me if he started. TO needs to get some reps for sure. But, we really do need to keep both QB's sharp.

In my analysis of our game against CCU, I stated that you should look for "both QBs to play."

Currently AD is playing on the punt coverage team. Not excatly a position that will ensure that he avoids injury.

(09-21-2012 10:45 PM)Campbell4President Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-21-2012 10:24 PM)Toledo Football 1st Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-21-2012 09:12 PM)Campbell4President Wrote: [ -> ]I don't want to go back to the two QB system. I would really like to see UT light it up in the first half so that Dantin can play all of the second half. However, if Dantin gets hurt, UT could end up either burning Blackburn's redshirt or getting Gannon or Cole French some playing time. I'm secretly rooting for French to earn a scholarship btw.

I think, really, the scenario is the same if either AD or TO get hurt. If that should happen it rather sounds like Macon will be the backup. Next, I imagine whoever is the best among Blackburn/Gannon/French. TO will be a senior next year, so it s/b about time to be giving the QB of the future some reps. (We certainly don't want TO hurt in this game.)

Haha, good point about either getting hurt. Yeah, I'll just hope neither gets hurt then. ;-)

The poster known as Campbell4President would like to retract his previous post on the grounds that it is moronic.

I drew a flow chart.

(09-21-2012 07:38 PM)NewMex RocketFan Wrote: [ -> ]UL-Monroe is now playing on ESPN using two QBs in the back field. One left handed the other right handed. In the last two plays each threw a pass. Attn: Matt Campbell!

I saw that and love it. One QB handed off to the other, that QB then threw a pass. Then they switched roles for the next play and ran it in the opposite direction.