CSNbbs

Fortunately for us, young does not mean that Pitt will be bad on defense. As long as there are kids on defense that have the ability, we should be OK on D. I'd be much more concerned if we had a bunch of RS seniors that never saw the field and now have to start because there isn't anyone else around - sort of what we had with Walt from time to time. That would suck.

(08-05-2012 01:38 PM)miko33 Wrote: [ -> ]Fortunately for us, young does not mean that Pitt will be bad on defense. As long as there are kids on defense that have the ability, we should be OK on D. I'd be much more concerned if we had a bunch of RS seniors that never saw the field and now have to start because there isn't anyone else around - sort of what we had with Walt from time to time. That would suck.

Hope all the wounded warriors are fully healed by the time we play Cincinnati - maybe should rest them for the YSU game since Cincy is a short week.

(08-05-2012 04:33 PM)BurghGuy68 Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-05-2012 01:38 PM)miko33 Wrote: [ -> ]Fortunately for us, young does not mean that Pitt will be bad on defense. As long as there are kids on defense that have the ability, we should be OK on D. I'd be much more concerned if we had a bunch of RS seniors that never saw the field and now have to start because there isn't anyone else around - sort of what we had with Walt from time to time. That would suck.

Hope all the wounded warriors are fully healed by the time we play Cincinnati - maybe should rest them for the YSU game since Cincy is a short week.

Agree. Pitt should be able to handle YSU with the more inexperienced players. it would give the younger guys some reps in addition to the extra rest for the banged up guys.