Quote:In the fifth Swing States survey taken since last fall, Obama leads Republican front-runner Mitt Romney 51%-42% among registered voters just a month after the president had trailed him by two percentage points.
The biggest change came among women under 50. In mid-February, just under half of those voters supported Obama. Now more than six in 10 do while Romney's support among them has dropped by 14 points, to 30%. The president leads him 2-1 in this group.
And if there's anything that history has taught us, it's that polling seven months ahead of the election always perfectly reflects the actual November results.
(04-03-2012 09:22 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote: [ -> ]And if there's anything that history has taught us, it's that polling seven months ahead of the election always perfectly reflects the actual November results.
(04-03-2012 09:22 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote: [ -> ]And if there's anything that history has taught us, it's that polling seven months ahead of the election always perfectly reflects the actual November results.
(04-03-2012 09:22 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote: [ -> ]And if there's anything that history has taught us, it's that polling seven months ahead of the election always perfectly reflects the actual November results.
And that polls that skew this much away from polls that were taken just a week or two ago are always the gospel truth.
I'd be interested to see the demographics of the poll. I'm betting that they're over sampled with self identified democrats.
(04-03-2012 09:22 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote: [ -> ]And if there's anything that history has taught us, it's that polling seven months ahead of the election always perfectly reflects the actual November results.
Right, especially when the master campaigner incumbent hasn't even begun his attacks meanwhile GOPers have been attacking Obama on the stump nonstop for a year.
How is Romney going to fix this huge deficit that opened up with women? Flip flop again on cutting funding for Planned Parenthood and an amendment exempting employers from offering insurance plans with birth control? Well it is Romney.
(04-03-2012 09:36 AM)Max Power Wrote: [ -> ]How is Romney going to fix this huge deficit that opened up with women? Flip flop again on cutting funding for Planned Parenthood and an amendment exempting employers from offering insurance plans with birth control? Well it is Romney.
Embrace the stupidity.
About two weeks ago a couple of polls, including Washington Post, found Obama losing to Romney and not doing any better among women than the traditional gender gap Dems have among them.
Now the idiot Maxi Pad will have you believe that just this past week, over 3 months since the Komen/PP and well over a month since Obama's attack on religious freedom that democrats call a "war on women" women have just now started to notice and because of those two things, Romney is losing with women.
It's tough to tell when Maxi Pad is lying or just deluding himself.
He absolutely can. See the charts I posted in the "Can the GOP cruise" (LOL) thread. But Romney is prime for attacks as an out of touch flip flopper elitist who makes $10,000 bets, jokes about how his dad closed factories in Michigan and laid off hundreds, thinks corporations are people, wants tax breaks for him and his billionaire NASCAR team owning buddies etc.
(04-03-2012 09:22 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote: [ -> ]And if there's anything that history has taught us, it's that polling seven months ahead of the election always perfectly reflects the actual November results.
If there's anything that normal brain function teaches us (which means this lesson is beyond your grasp), it's that you'd much rather be ahead than behind regardless of whether you are seven months out or seven days out.
(04-03-2012 09:22 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote: [ -> ]And if there's anything that history has taught us, it's that polling seven months ahead of the election always perfectly reflects the actual November results.
If there's anything that normal brain function teaches us (which means this lesson is beyond your grasp), it's that you'd much rather be ahead than behind regardless of whether you are seven months out or seven days out.
Oh look, the blight on humanity is back. If you're here, who is calling everyone a racist in the other forum?
(04-03-2012 09:22 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote: [ -> ]And if there's anything that history has taught us, it's that polling seven months ahead of the election always perfectly reflects the actual November results.
If there's anything that normal brain function teaches us (which means this lesson is beyond your grasp), it's that you'd much rather be ahead than behind regardless of whether you are seven months out or seven days out.
Oh look, the blight on humanity is back. If you're here, who is calling everyone a racist in the other forum?
It's sad that the only way you righties know how to deny your evil is to blame the person that is pointing it out.
(04-03-2012 10:52 AM)Max Power Wrote: [ -> ]He absolutely can. See the charts I posted in the "Can the GOP cruise" (LOL) thread. But Romney is prime for attacks as an out of touch flip flopper elitist who makes $10,000 bets, jokes about how his dad closed factories in Michigan and laid off hundreds, thinks corporations are people, wants tax breaks for him and his billionaire NASCAR team owning buddies etc.
Romney's biggest problems are that people like him less and less the more they get to know him and he just can't connect to everyday Americans. He has two "home states", Michigan and Mass, and I'd wager he won't come within ten points of the President in either state.
(04-03-2012 09:22 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote: [ -> ]And if there's anything that history has taught us, it's that polling seven months ahead of the election always perfectly reflects the actual November results.
If there's anything that normal brain function teaches us (which means this lesson is beyond your grasp), it's that you'd much rather be ahead than behind regardless of whether you are seven months out or seven days out.
Oh look, the blight on humanity is back. If you're here, who is calling everyone a racist in the other forum?
It's sad that the only way you righties know how to deny your evil is to blame the person that is pointing it out.
So it's "evil" to point out that polls seven months ahead of an election are not always accurate?
(04-03-2012 09:22 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote: [ -> ]And if there's anything that history has taught us, it's that polling seven months ahead of the election always perfectly reflects the actual November results.
If there's anything that normal brain function teaches us (which means this lesson is beyond your grasp), it's that you'd much rather be ahead than behind regardless of whether you are seven months out or seven days out.
Oh look, the blight on humanity is back. If you're here, who is calling everyone a racist in the other forum?
It's sad that the only way you righties know how to deny your evil is to blame the person that is pointing it out.
So it's "evil" to point out that polls seven months ahead of an election are not always accurate?
(04-03-2012 02:45 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote: [ -> ]If there's anything that normal brain function teaches us (which means this lesson is beyond your grasp), it's that you'd much rather be ahead than behind regardless of whether you are seven months out or seven days out.
Oh look, the blight on humanity is back. If you're here, who is calling everyone a racist in the other forum?
It's sad that the only way you righties know how to deny your evil is to blame the person that is pointing it out.
So it's "evil" to point out that polls seven months ahead of an election are not always accurate?
Your stupidity is painful.
Vintage scUM. Just start hurling random insults when you get called out for making a post that makes absolutely no ******* sense. Maybe you were going to call me evil in another thread and just got them mixed up?
![[Image: employeeevaluation.jpg]](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-KN9uoLbIX5k/Tgfu87UiJUI/AAAAAAAABo8/4Drfz6sw--k/s1600/employeeevaluation.jpg)
