CSNbbs

Full Version: NTR Time to make a stink
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
OK i know there is another board this should be on but i think it needs to be from page for a while. The Griz are bound by NBA rules and the front office is too big of a wussies to say anything. But if you sat through tonight's Griz/Lakers game you must be frustrated to the point where enough is enough. In a DOUBLE OVERTIME game the Griz shot only 5 FTs compared to 34 for the Lakers. This is with the Griz taking 116 shots and scoring SIXTY points in the paint. What makes it even worse is that two of the five were on T's. So even though the Griz scored 60 points in the paint and took 116 shots they shot only 3 FTs during the flow of the game. The Griz will do NOTHING due to NBA rules, so it is up to the fans to make a statement and raise a fuss about this bull****. Time for suggestions as to what we the fans can do to make sure there is so much attention on such officiating that the NBA cannot cover it up.

This is not taking in account the phantom clear path foul where the Lakers player tripped on his own foot. The official went to the replay and saw that he tripped on his own foot and that another Grizzlies player was ahead of him on the court and they still called it clear path. I know they could not reverse the foul call but to compound it by calling a bogus clear path is adding insult to injury.
(03-14-2012 12:25 AM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ]OK i know there is another board this should be on

[Image: tumblr_lrvhr9yjaU1qjxsre.jpg]
Get this rasslin crap off the TIGER board!!!!!
(03-14-2012 12:25 AM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ]OK i know there is another board this should be on but i think it needs to be from page for a while. The Griz are bound by NBA rules and the front office is too big of a wussies to say anything. But if you sat through tonight's Griz/Lakers game you must be frustrated to the point where enough is enough. In a DOUBLE OVERTIME game the Griz shot only 5 FTs compared to 34 for the Lakers. This is with the Griz taking 116 shots and scoring SIXTY points in the paint. What makes it even worse is that two of the five were on T's. So even though the Griz scored 60 points in the paint and took 116 shots they shot only 3 FTs during the flow of the game. The Griz will do NOTHING due to NBA rules, so it is up to the fans to make a statement and raise a fuss about this bull****. Time for suggestions as to what we the fans can do to make sure there is so much attention on such officiating that the NBA cannot cover it up.

This is not taking in account the phantom clear path foul where the Lakers player tripped on his own foot. The official went to the replay and saw that he tripped on his own foot and that another Grizzlies player was ahead of him on the court and they still called it clear path. I know they could not reverse the foul call but to compound it by calling a bogus clear path is adding insult to injury.

That phantom trip call was just so laughable. I don't even know how the ref kept a straight face when he called it clear path after viewing the replay.
(03-14-2012 12:43 AM)FORealTigerFan Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-14-2012 12:25 AM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ]OK i know there is another board this should be on but i think it needs to be from page for a while. The Griz are bound by NBA rules and the front office is too big of a wussies to say anything. But if you sat through tonight's Griz/Lakers game you must be frustrated to the point where enough is enough. In a DOUBLE OVERTIME game the Griz shot only 5 FTs compared to 34 for the Lakers. This is with the Griz taking 116 shots and scoring SIXTY points in the paint. What makes it even worse is that two of the five were on T's. So even though the Griz scored 60 points in the paint and took 116 shots they shot only 3 FTs during the flow of the game. The Griz will do NOTHING due to NBA rules, so it is up to the fans to make a statement and raise a fuss about this bull****. Time for suggestions as to what we the fans can do to make sure there is so much attention on such officiating that the NBA cannot cover it up.

This is not taking in account the phantom clear path foul where the Lakers player tripped on his own foot. The official went to the replay and saw that he tripped on his own foot and that another Grizzlies player was ahead of him on the court and they still called it clear path. I know they could not reverse the foul call but to compound it by calling a bogus clear path is adding insult to injury.

That phantom trip call was just so laughable. I don't even know how the ref kept a straight face when he called it clear path after viewing the replay.

If it was just that play maybe you could over look it. But when you add the FT differential and the non calls against LAL. It begins to get suspicious. Kobe shouldn't have been in game after swinging on the rim after one of his dunks. Should have had 2 Ts instead of just the one he got. How many time was Marc run over and either no calls or he was called for foul. Wish i knew Sterns home address. I would box up a bag of bull**** and send it to him. I mean 116 shots and only 12 fouls and 3 FTs from those 116 shots. The majority down in the paint.
Despite all of this, the Grizzlies still had their chances. They couldn't make a 3-pointer if their lives depended on it, and the Lakers made some big-time plays at the end. Kobe hit great shots, and Bynum played like a monster.

The Grizzlies were playing without Rudy Gay, so it's hard for me to worry too much about this one.

This may be because, unlike you apparently, I have already come to the realization that NBA refereeing general sucks on a nightly basis.
You just copied some parts of the CA's article and pasted it here.
Are you talking to me or the OP?

I did not do that. I do not read the CA online because it won't let me.
(03-14-2012 01:16 AM)TIGERBANDIT Wrote: [ -> ]Are you talking to me or the OP?

I did not do that. I do not read the CA online because it won't let me.

You can get around that if you want to. When page loads quickly highlight and click select all then copy and paste it to wordpad or notepad. You have to edit out some of the stuff but can see the article.

If there is anything similar to what i post in the communist apologist that means they have copied something i have written.
(03-14-2012 12:43 AM)FORealTigerFan Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-14-2012 12:25 AM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ]OK i know there is another board this should be on but i think it needs to be from page for a while. The Griz are bound by NBA rules and the front office is too big of a wussies to say anything. But if you sat through tonight's Griz/Lakers game you must be frustrated to the point where enough is enough. In a DOUBLE OVERTIME game the Griz shot only 5 FTs compared to 34 for the Lakers. This is with the Griz taking 116 shots and scoring SIXTY points in the paint. What makes it even worse is that two of the five were on T's. So even though the Griz scored 60 points in the paint and took 116 shots they shot only 3 FTs during the flow of the game. The Griz will do NOTHING due to NBA rules, so it is up to the fans to make a statement and raise a fuss about this bull****. Time for suggestions as to what we the fans can do to make sure there is so much attention on such officiating that the NBA cannot cover it up.

This is not taking in account the phantom clear path foul where the Lakers player tripped on his own foot. The official went to the replay and saw that he tripped on his own foot and that another Grizzlies player was ahead of him on the court and they still called it clear path. I know they could not reverse the foul call but to compound it by calling a bogus clear path is adding insult to injury.

That phantom trip call was just so laughable. I don't even know how the ref kept a straight face when he called it clear path after viewing the replay.

Lakers fans are still claiming it was a trip by a Griz player.
Why was WordPeace not ejected for throwing a punch at TA. He was T'ed up, but looked like a punch to me.
(03-14-2012 02:21 AM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-14-2012 01:16 AM)TIGERBANDIT Wrote: [ -> ]Are you talking to me or the OP?

I did not do that. I do not read the CA online because it won't let me.

You can get around that if you want to. When page loads quickly highlight and click select all then copy and paste it to wordpad or notepad. You have to edit out some of the stuff but can see the article.

If there is anything similar to what i post in the communist apologist that means they have copied something i have written.

Just hit stop as the page loads... lets you read
Reference URL's