CSNbbs

(11-09-2011 12:10 AM)numbersdontlie Wrote: [ -> ]wow cubit opening up on his own 92

Did not look like a good situation. I feel like Cubit's days have run their course at WMU.

I want some votes ! Any team winning 5 in a row deserves some votes.

Wow, 66-63? Ha! We held Toledo to 60!

(11-09-2011 12:38 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote: [ -> ]I want some votes ! Any team winning 5 in a row deserves some votes.

No we don't. Not against MAC teams.

(11-09-2011 12:54 AM)NIU17 Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-09-2011 12:38 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote: [ -> ]I want some votes ! Any team winning 5 in a row deserves some votes.

No we don't. Not against MAC teams.

3 in a row on the road though

(11-09-2011 12:57 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-09-2011 12:54 AM)NIU17 Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-09-2011 12:38 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote: [ -> ]I want some votes ! Any team winning 5 in a row deserves some votes.

No we don't. Not against MAC teams.

3 in a row on the road though

We beat teams with terrible defenses. And ours didn't look too good either. If we beat Kansas and give Wisconsin a competitive game, I would say yes. Toledo giving up 60 points again doesn't help either.

(11-09-2011 01:02 AM)NIU17 Wrote: [ -> ]We beat teams with terrible defenses. And ours didn't look too good either. If we beat Kansas and give Wisconsin a competitive game, I would say yes. Toledo giving up 60 points again doesn't help either.

Bowling Green's defense had only given up more than 30 points twice prior to playing us.

Everyone's defense looks bad against us.

DOES THIS THREAD REALLY HAVE 6,000+ VIEWS SINCE GAMETIME!??!

(11-09-2011 01:17 AM)NIUfilmmaker Wrote: [ -> ]DOES THIS THREAD REALLY HAVE 6,000+ VIEWS SINCE GAMETIME!??!

I was bored, okay?

(11-09-2011 12:38 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote: [ -> ]I want some votes ! Any team winning 5 in a row deserves some votes.

We will need 3 more wins in a row by big scores before we get some votes. However a fourth win over a AQ program in a bowl would still likely not give us enough to be ranked.

We are 2 positive plays from being 9-1 and 3 negative plays from being 5-5.

While it would be nice, I really don't care that much about being ranked. MACC victory or bust!

(11-09-2011 10:47 AM)niuguy Wrote: [ -> ]While it would be nice, I really don't care that much about being ranked. MACC victory or bust!

+1

(11-09-2011 01:17 AM)NIUfilmmaker Wrote: [ -> ]DOES THIS THREAD REALLY HAVE 6,000+ VIEWS SINCE GAMETIME!??!

My God, a game thread with 74 (as of now) pages. This has to be a record. Let's work on getting this up to 100!

This 10 posts per page is terrible. I like the 50 per page.

(11-09-2011 12:19 PM)huskie1stdown Wrote: [ -> ]This 10 posts per page is terrible. I like the 50 per page.

You can change the setting...in the upser cp section above and revert to the old setting of 50 posts per page. Click user CP, then Edit options (left Hand column) then Thread View Options on the right...I highly recommend it...

Thanks, Huskies-while I swallowed my pride (it came back up right after) and publicly stated "Go Falcons" I'm thrilled that since you won you won HUGE!

(11-09-2011 12:27 PM)Huskie359 Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-09-2011 12:19 PM)huskie1stdown Wrote: [ -> ]This 10 posts per page is terrible. I like the 50 per page.

You can change the setting...in the upser cp section above and revert to the old setting of 50 posts per page. Click user CP, then Edit options (left Hand column) then Thread View Options on the right...I highly recommend it...

Thanks - went from 74 pages to 15 for this thread!

Sign in the stands at the game last night. The guy holding it looks a little "soft" himself!

(11-09-2011 12:27 PM)Huskie359 Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-09-2011 12:19 PM)huskie1stdown Wrote: [ -> ]This 10 posts per page is terrible. I like the 50 per page.

You can change the setting...in the upser cp section above and revert to the old setting of 50 posts per page. Click user CP, then Edit options (left Hand column) then Thread View Options on the right...I highly recommend it...

Much better. Thanks!

Nice sign. That's the best he could come up with?