CSNbbs

http://www.ubbullrun.com/2011/10/1/24631...errankings

# Team Change Comment
1 Toledo 1 Huge win for Toledo right now they have done more to prove themselves than anyone in the conference.
2 Temple -1 Four turnovers is a very untemple like move. Word is the Owls might be moving on will they beat a MAC team with a winning record before they go?
3 WMU 4 Ok I am finally a believer in WMU. Their win, along with OU, NIU, and Temple all struggling moves them to the top tier
4 Ohio -1 On the plus side they escaped with their lives, on the minus… Kent, Really?
5 BGSU - Hard to bump them for getting crushed against a ranked team, especially when others played so poorly
6 NIU -2 Has any team in the MAC been more disappointing the NIU? They continue to play below where everyone expected them to be
7 Ball State -1 They only fall because I am not quite ready to put NIU below them, yet, but right now they look like a force in the west
8 CMU 1 CMU's win pretty much smashes up the established picture of the west.
9 Miami -1 Whats more impressive. Miami's ascent last year or their descent this season.
10 EMU 2 When was the last time EMU was 3-2? Sure two of those games are against EMU
11 Buffalo -1 Well, lets just be thankful the check cleared. Other than that there are no real positives to take away
12 Kent -1 Kent continues to be Kent. They have yet to core more than 12 points against an FBS defense
13 Akron - Arkon does not have another 'winnable' until November.

Comment 0 comments | Add comment | 0 recs |

10 EMU 2 When was the last time EMU was 3-2? Sure two of those games are against EMU

Comment 0 comments | Add comment | 0 recs |
[/quote]



Two of the wins, two of the losses, or one of each?

(10-03-2011 01:55 PM)CHIPPEWA ENEMA Wrote: [ -> ]10 EMU 2 When was the last time EMU was 3-2? Sure two of those games are against EMU

Comment 0 comments | Add comment | 0 recs |

Two of the wins, two of the losses, or one of each?
[/quote]

Think about it- none of your answers make sense. The record of EMU vs EMU in those two games would be 2-2 for each EMU involved. That means whichever EMU he is listing here is 1-0 against teams that aren't them. Got that? So EMU is undefeated in OOC games. Well, at least one of the EMUs is.

(10-03-2011 01:55 PM)CHIPPEWA ENEMA Wrote: [ -> ]10 EMU 2 When was the last time EMU was 3-2? Sure two of those games are against EMU

Comment 0 comments | Add comment | 0 recs |

Two of the wins, two of the losses, or one of each?
[/quote]

Dang I copied off the site before I fixed it....

(10-03-2011 02:17 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-03-2011 01:55 PM)CHIPPEWA ENEMA Wrote: [ -> ]10 EMU 2 When was the last time EMU was 3-2? Sure two of those games are against EMU

Comment 0 comments | Add comment | 0 recs |

Two of the wins, two of the losses, or one of each?

Think about it- none of your answers make sense. The record of EMU vs EMU in those two games would be 2-2 for each EMU involved. That means whichever EMU he is listing here is 1-0 against teams that aren't them. Got that? So EMU is undefeated in OOC games. Well, at least one of the EMUs is.
[/quote]

Shame on me!

My problem is not with the rank, but the comment. Kent has been giving Ohio fits ever since Solich came to town.

(10-03-2011 02:58 PM)OZoner Wrote: [ -> ]My problem is not with the rank, but the comment. Kent has been giving Ohio fits ever since Solich came to town.

that's true...just like we've been giving Miami fits ever since he came into town!

(10-03-2011 01:49 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: [ -> ]http://www.ubbullrun.com/2011/10/1/24631...errankings

# Team Change Comment
1 Toledo 1 Huge win for Toledo right now they have done more to prove themselves than anyone in the conference.
2 Temple -1 Four turnovers is a very untemple like move. Word is the Owls might be moving on will they beat a MAC team with a winning record before they go?
3 WMU 4 Ok I am finally a believer in WMU. Their win, along with OU, NIU, and Temple all struggling moves them to the top tier
4 Ohio -1 On the plus side they escaped with their lives, on the minus… Kent, Really?
5 BGSU - Hard to bump them for getting crushed against a ranked team, especially when others played so poorly
6 NIU -2 Has any team in the MAC been more disappointing the NIU? They continue to play below where everyone expected them to be7 Ball State -1 They only fall because I am not quite ready to put NIU below them, yet, but right now they look like a force in the west
8 CMU 1 CMU's win pretty much smashes up the established picture of the west.
9 Miami -1 Whats more impressive. Miami's ascent last year or their descent this season.
10 EMU 2 When was the last time EMU was 3-2? Sure two of those games are against EMU
11 Buffalo -1 Well, lets just be thankful the check cleared. Other than that there are no real positives to take away
12 Kent -1 Kent continues to be Kent. They have yet to core more than 12 points against an FBS defense
13 Akron - Arkon does not have another 'winnable' until November.

Comment 0 comments | Add comment | 0 recs |

I can answer that one.....no.

We should be behind Western.

(10-03-2011 06:48 PM)JHG722 Wrote: [ -> ]We should be behind Western.

I almost did that but really how often will Pierce be a fumble machine..

Miami should be #12.

(10-03-2011 08:26 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-03-2011 06:48 PM)JHG722 Wrote: [ -> ]We should be behind Western.

I almost did that but really how often will Pierce be a fumble machine..

Pretty sure he only fumbled once so far.

(10-03-2011 08:26 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-03-2011 06:48 PM)JHG722 Wrote: [ -> ]We should be behind Western.

I almost did that but really how often will Pierce be a fumble machine..

fumble machine huh?

Who else has the D Line to stuff him?

(10-04-2011 03:18 AM)owen Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-03-2011 08:26 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-03-2011 06:48 PM)JHG722 Wrote: [ -> ]We should be behind Western.

I almost did that but really how often will Pierce be a fumble machine..

fumble machine huh?

Who else has the D Line to stuff him?

Fair point.... I am just saying that Temple had an off week. Toledo is, I think, easily the best in the MAC to date but Temple will usually be closer in that game.

Something about the water in Philly makes temple coaches idiots when it comes to Quarterbacks. They can't recruit them, they can't bring them up, and they seem unable to pick one guy and go with it.

(10-03-2011 02:17 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote: [ -> ]Think about it- none of your answers make sense. The record of EMU vs EMU in those two games would be 2-2 for each EMU involved. That means whichever EMU he is listing here is 1-0 against teams that aren't them. Got that? So EMU is undefeated in OOC games. Well, at least one of the EMUs is.

But the games would be SELLOUTS, possibly record setting.

(10-03-2011 09:04 PM)JohnnyMac Wrote: [ -> ]Miami should be #12.

Agreed!

(10-04-2011 08:33 AM)BarnardHall211 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-03-2011 02:17 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote: [ -> ]Think about it- none of your answers make sense. The record of EMU vs EMU in those two games would be 2-2 for each EMU involved. That means whichever EMU he is listing here is 1-0 against teams that aren't them. Got that? So EMU is undefeated in OOC games. Well, at least one of the EMUs is.

But the games would be SELLOUTS, possibly record setting.

Nope. Even if EMU has all its fans show up and EMU has all ITS fans show up that's only 3,000- subtract the 100 players, coaches and cheerleaders that another team other than EMU would bring and the 500 fans and attendance will actually drop by about 600.

(10-04-2011 08:27 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: [ -> ]Fair point.... I am just saying that Temple had an off week. Toledo is, I think, easily the best in the MAC to date but Temple will usually be closer in that game.

Something about the water in Philly makes temple coaches idiots when it comes to Quarterbacks. They can't recruit them, they can't bring them up, and they seem unable to pick one guy and go with it.

"Easily the the best in the MAC" is very debatable.

Sagarin has WMU on top.

(10-04-2011 09:38 AM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-04-2011 08:33 AM)BarnardHall211 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-03-2011 02:17 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote: [ -> ]Think about it- none of your answers make sense. The record of EMU vs EMU in those two games would be 2-2 for each EMU involved. That means whichever EMU he is listing here is 1-0 against teams that aren't them. Got that? So EMU is undefeated in OOC games. Well, at least one of the EMUs is.

But the games would be SELLOUTS, possibly record setting.

Nope. Even if EMU has all its fans show up and EMU has all ITS fans show up that's only 3,000- subtract the 100 players, coaches and cheerleaders that another team other than EMU would bring and the 500 fans and attendance will actually drop by about 600.

Yeah, but then you have to add back in the concession stand workers and band... does each EMU get to count those?

Oh... well, you're probably right, the attendance would still drop by 600.

(10-04-2011 09:38 AM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-04-2011 08:33 AM)BarnardHall211 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-03-2011 02:17 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote: [ -> ]Think about it- none of your answers make sense. The record of EMU vs EMU in those two games would be 2-2 for each EMU involved. That means whichever EMU he is listing here is 1-0 against teams that aren't them. Got that? So EMU is undefeated in OOC games. Well, at least one of the EMUs is.

But the games would be SELLOUTS, possibly record setting.

Nope. Even if EMU has all its fans show up and EMU has all ITS fans show up that's only 3,000- subtract the 100 players, coaches and cheerleaders that another team other than EMU would bring and the 500 fans and attendance will actually drop by about 600.

Yeah .... I was referring to the bloated attendance numbers EMU posts and figured since both teams would be EMU, you'd have a sell out.