CSNbbs

Full Version: UCONN President statement on realignment
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
http://blogs.courant.com/uconn_football/...t-s-1.html

Quote:"Conference expansion and realignment has been a subject of public speculation for the last several months and will continue to be so in the future, for years most likely. It is not close to being over, so we need to have some patience. There have been new rumors every day regarding schools and conferences, and now Pittsburgh and Syracuse are leaving the BIG EAST, which is a jolt, but not a huge surprise.

"UConn is a proud charter member of the BIG EAST and we have taken a lead role in the league's success over the years. However, it is my responsibility as President that we stay in constant communication and be actively involved in discussions with our counterparts from around the country to ensure the successful long-term future of our university's athletic program. The truth is that our teams will play competitive athletics at the highest level of excellence, wherever things land, and our central goals will be academic success and compliance, always.

"To my mind, the conference realignments and incessant national gossip is distracting many presidents and athletic directors from the real conversations we should be having, about academics, the distorting role of money in sports and what it means to support student-athletes. I hope all settles soon, and we can change the national focus away from profiteering and back to student-athletes, where it belongs."

Translation:

UCONN knew about Pitt/SU to the ACC. It is funny our president knows that while BE commisher has no clue. UCONN cares about academics since she mentioned multiple times. This basically means B1G or the ACC with ACC most likely.

Also, there is a rumor from a VU insider that ACC wanted UCONN but UCONN did not want to leave the BE a year ago. ACC basically invited SU and Pitt to force UCONN's hand. The guy said a year ago this would happen and he even posted exact order of invite which is SU/Pitt first and then UCONN/RU. Take it for whatever it is worth.

http://rutgers.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fi...88&style=2

Quote:IwillFlyAway
VUSports.com
Post #99
MyFanPage
Add Buddy
Ignore


Re: ACC official: ACC wants RU and Pound Puppies Reply

Dude, no offense, save yourself the grief- don't play semantics with me. It will be painful for you.

I have a guess- pure speculation on my part, ever since I started spamming your board last August about su, pitt, uconn and ru to the acc, including the order of invites, either I've been prescient beyond belief or I've got a little birdie hat blew your "insiders" away...in any event speculation was uconn didn't want to jump. Nord convinced su that if they jumped first along with pitt, it softened it for uconn. As i told you guys last werk, the wood has been on for uconn. That was the plum for duke and believe it or not bc. Gdf at bc caved, and flipped completely. Why? Who knows. In any event this is a power play to get uconn. And it is working. When k gave the interview to katz, talking points were spot on. As always it's not over. When this is all said and done you will be amazed about how much of a driver avademics has been. The foia emails concerning tejas will be revealing about how much of a role they ayed.

For the record, I hate what will happen to the BE. It is sad to see a conference where we are a founder failling apart. All of our rivals are now in the ACC. I always said our commisher is an idiot and it is proven to be the case. I also said there is a good possiblity ESPN would destroy the BE before the next TV contract and it is happening now. The logical conclusion is the ACC/BE merging to be the next super conference and that is coming true too.

Our president is a smart aggressive lady. She is a Dukie alum and GTECH president used to report to her when she was overseeing all the public universities in Georgia, so she has some pulls. She can always call our former president who is University of Illinois president and former UCONN/UVA president Casteen III. I am sure she is making all the calls now.

It looks like we have no choice but going. I just hope rest of the BE schools found homes. It has been a sad day but at least the ACC North will be full of former BE teams.
BCinterruption says that BC has the votes to block UConn to ACC
(09-18-2011 06:23 PM)Cubanbull Wrote: [ -> ]BCinterruption says that BC has the votes to block UConn to ACC

Ah, BC, remember them? Another school with executives of high moral character.

South Florida outdraws them now.
(09-18-2011 05:53 PM)KnightChris Wrote: [ -> ]Minor quibble, but calling UConn a "founder" of the Big East really depends on how you want to define the word. The conference was actually created by Syracuse, St. John's, Providence, & Georgetown. After we set up the framework of the conference after much hard work, the four schools got together to decide on who should be in the first batch of invites. UConn was one of those schools.

Correct. UConn and BC said yes, Rutgers and Holy Cross said no. Seton Hall was Rutgers' replacement.
(09-18-2011 06:23 PM)Cubanbull Wrote: [ -> ]BCinterruption says that BC has the votes to block UConn to ACC

If ACC wants to tell BC to jump, BC will say how high. BC got zero pull in the ACC today or in the future. Just pay attention to the news in the next couple of days.
(09-18-2011 06:34 PM)SF Husky Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-18-2011 06:23 PM)Cubanbull Wrote: [ -> ]BCinterruption says that BC has the votes to block UConn to ACC

If ACC wants to tell BC to jump, BC will say how high. BC got zero pull in the ACC today or in the future. Just pay attention to the news in the next couple of days.

We will find out in a few days
(09-18-2011 05:53 PM)KnightChris Wrote: [ -> ]Minor quibble, but calling UConn a "founder" of the Big East really depends on how you want to define the word. The conference was actually created by Syracuse, St. John's, Providence, & Georgetown. After we set up the framework of the conference after much hard work, the four schools got together to decide on who should be in the first batch of invites. UConn was one of those schools.

Founder, charter or whatever, we were there from the beginning.
(09-18-2011 06:23 PM)Cubanbull Wrote: [ -> ]BCinterruption says that BC has the votes to block UConn to ACC

That wouldn't be the same BC that just lost to Duke FB at home and made the NIT last year and never played in a final four or a BCS game planning to block a BE team with three national titles, including last year's and a BCS birth like BC has never had.

Can't be that BC. Yea, they got clout in the ACC.
(09-18-2011 06:23 PM)Cubanbull Wrote: [ -> ]BCinterruption says that BC has the votes to block UConn to ACC

I'll concede BC and Miami, but I wonder who else (if even true)?
If BC tries to flex its muscle after getting b!tchslapped by Duke, I'll laugh my @ss off... 03-lmfao
(09-18-2011 07:33 PM)bitcruncher Wrote: [ -> ]If BC tries to flex its muscle after getting b!tchslapped by Duke, I'll laugh my @ss off... 03-lmfao

Coach K already campaigned for UCONN essentially so BCU got no say whatsoever. ACC still values basketball last I checked and UCONN brings a lot more in that department than BCU. BCU should be happy ACC took them last time because Miami insisted on it.
(09-18-2011 06:23 PM)Cubanbull Wrote: [ -> ]BCinterruption says that BC has the votes to block UConn to ACC

That was

A: a "rumor"

and

B: Likely untrue, considering Syracuse and Pitt were listed in those votes.

I am not concerned.
Reference URL's