CSNbbs

Full Version: Pat Forde puts his 2 cents out about realignment
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
And he obviously thinks Clinton was impeached. SMDH

(By the way, Baylor's president is Kenneth Starr, the guy whose investigation got Bill Clinton impeached for White House hanky-panky. The Aggies might want to ask Clinton how much fun it is to tangle with Starr.)

Really, Pat?

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...s-join-sec
(09-07-2011 09:29 PM)paztiger Wrote: [ -> ]And he obviously thinks Clinton was impeached. SMDH

(By the way, Baylor's president is Kenneth Starr, the guy whose investigation got Bill Clinton impeached for White House hanky-panky. The Aggies might want to ask Clinton how much fun it is to tangle with Starr.)

Really, Pat?

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...s-join-sec

yes, Clinton was impeached...doesn't mean he was removed from office.
you might want to look up the definition of impeachment
Well it obviously didn't change who was president so it wasn't nothing but a slap on the hand. typical American government standards. But that's a whole different topic for a different forum.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sports/college...ht-now.ece

This is a related article in the Dallas Morning News.
(09-07-2011 09:36 PM)paztiger Wrote: [ -> ]Well it obviously didn't change who was president so it wasn't nothing but a slap on the hand. typical American government standards. But that's a whole different topic for a different forum.

moron
(09-07-2011 09:37 PM)fsquid Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-07-2011 09:36 PM)paztiger Wrote: [ -> ]Well it obviously didn't change who was president so it wasn't nothing but a slap on the hand. typical American government standards. But that's a whole different topic for a different forum.

moron

Too much wax sniffing at the museums.
This thread just entered the triple face palm zone.
Being impeached is similar to being indicted by a grand jury.
(09-07-2011 09:37 PM)fsquid Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-07-2011 09:36 PM)paztiger Wrote: [ -> ]Well it obviously didn't change who was president so it wasn't nothing but a slap on the hand. typical American government standards. But that's a whole different topic for a different forum.

moron

Ahhh, resort to name calling. Great move!
(09-07-2011 09:57 PM)herkermer Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-07-2011 09:37 PM)fsquid Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-07-2011 09:36 PM)paztiger Wrote: [ -> ]Well it obviously didn't change who was president so it wasn't nothing but a slap on the hand. typical American government standards. But that's a whole different topic for a different forum.

moron

Ahhh, resort to name calling. Great move!

Well, when someone wont accept the fact you are left with little else.
With all due respect to Baylor...in terms of TX A&M leaving them...

Baylor needs to clean out their collective vag***s.
(09-07-2011 10:21 PM)Mimi Wrote: [ -> ]With all due respect to Baylor...in terms of TX A&M leaving them...

Baylor needs to clean out their collective vag***s.

Why should Baylor--and I would include KU, KState, and ISU---sign away their legal rights in a situation where they are going to be screwed?
(09-07-2011 10:34 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-07-2011 10:21 PM)Mimi Wrote: [ -> ]With all due respect to Baylor...in terms of TX A&M leaving them...

Baylor needs to clean out their collective vag***s.

Why should Baylor--and I would include KU, KState, and ISU---sign away their legal rights in a situation where they are going to be screwed?

they shouldn't. I don't blame them for firing all their bullets before they end up out of the bcs
(09-07-2011 10:34 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-07-2011 10:21 PM)Mimi Wrote: [ -> ]With all due respect to Baylor...in terms of TX A&M leaving them...

Baylor needs to clean out their collective vag***s.

Why should Baylor--and I would include KU, KState, and ISU---sign away their legal rights in a situation where they are going to be screwed?

Tony Barnhart today on Parrish's show said it pretty well. He said "where was Baylor's complaining about "Texas football schools tradition" 20 years ago when they left SMU, Houston, Rice, and UTEP in the dust."


And the whole impeached thing....that is just funny stuff!
(09-07-2011 09:44 PM)Watauga9 Wrote: [ -> ]This thread just entered the triple face palm zone.

[Image: 93868a469409821d2559884c4bf8d11d.jpg]
(09-07-2011 09:29 PM)paztiger Wrote: [ -> ]And he obviously thinks Clinton was impeached. SMDH

03-lmfao 03-lmfao 03-lmfao
1. Baylor didn't care so much about Rice, SMU, TCU and Houston when they had Ann 'Ma' Richards throw her wait around to get them in the BigXII and leave their SWC mates high and dry so screw them.

2. I want to fight Pat "high-fiving Rick Pitino lovin" Forde
I would think 20 years ago it was different people making the decisions and those people probably thought it was ok. Today we are not talking collegiate sports, but mega business enterprises making decisions worth 100s of million dollars.
This sentence is music to my ears: "Texas and Oklahoma would probably rather the Big 12 stay together ". My dream is to be included in a reconfigured Big 12. Go Ken! Screw the greedy BCS elitists and their media allies who clearly are pushing for an exclusive 64-school upper tier, with no regard for anything but money.
Pages: 1 2 3
Reference URL's