CSNbbs

Amazing.

He's partially wrong on Iran, though. They house the leader of modern Persia, they can mobilize tribes very easily.

As for controlling the money supply and abolishing the Federal Reserve, oh my goodness, how is this man not in the executive NOW...

Partially? He's dead ass wrong. If they want to put him in charge of the Sec'y of the Treasury, fine. However, he doesn't need to be anywhere near the Resolute desk, ESPECIALLY in the back.

(08-12-2011 12:18 PM)Rebel Wrote: [ -> ]Partially? He's dead ass wrong. If they want to put him in charge of the Sec'y of the Treasury, fine. However, he doesn't need to be anywhere near the Resolute desk, ESPECIALLY in the back.

I don't agree with him on this issue..but..I don't see sanctions having worked either other than punishing the Iranian people who are generally pro western. He sees our policies being counterproductive to peace with Iran. I tend to agree. It is pretty clear that the US policies decades ago were directly instrumental in causing the problems there now. I am not in favor of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. I am also not in favor of refusing to sit down with them and working diplomatically to come to an understanding with my enemy. The last thing we need is another damn war and I doubt the Iranians really want that either. Someone needs to take the lead and head this nonsense off before the Israeli's do something we may all regret.

How much jihad and suicide bombings were taking place before we stuck our nose in their business?