CSNbbs

Full Version: The Royal Wedding
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
I don't get it. Why would anyone here (in the U.S.) care? What possible logical reason would you have for watching it? Yet, it's all over the television. Why don't we get more Three Stooges, W.C. Fields, or Laurel and Hardy?
People (mainly women) are usually fascinated with fairy tale weddings.
Complete waste of time.
(04-29-2011 07:28 AM)ByrdDogX Wrote: [ -> ]Complete waste of time.

Some people like it, some don't. It's your opinion.
I woke up at 4am this morning and my wife was watching it......

I drive her crazy with Pawn Stars and Swamp People. I guess we're even.
In the historical context of the British monarchy I think it's pretty interesting even though they have no governing authority.

Just like any media sensation the press is getting worked up and over-hyped into a frenzy over the story lines. In a way, this is what Charles and Diana were supposed to be. Charles was to be the first King of England since 1952 but after the grandeur of their globally televised wedding followed by the disappointment of their marriage and then the death of " The People's Princess" the monarchy was embarrassed and in tatters. Now, you have Diana's oldest son in line to be the next King as he marries a woman "of the people" although a non-royal which makes her all the more endearing to British citizens. The similarities are striking.

Media is going to take to that like a moth to the flame. All that said, I slept in this morning
(04-29-2011 06:43 AM)oldmangrizz Wrote: [ -> ]I don't get it. Why would anyone here (in the U.S.) care? What possible logical reason would you have for watching it? Yet, it's all over the television. Why don't we get more Three Stooges, W.C. Fields, or Laurel and Hardy?

Because he is the son of Diana and American love Diana. It's a once in a lifetime event like Charles and Diana was. It's a neat thing and a good escape from the bad news of the world everyday but today we focus on beating the Spurs
My girlfriend recorded it. Sunday morning I have to make her waffles and sit and watch the wedding with her. Now she's just trying to avoid as much about it as possible until she can see it.
(04-29-2011 11:08 AM)MemTigerFan Wrote: [ -> ]My girlfriend recorded it. Sunday morning I have to make her waffles and sit and watch the wedding with her. Now she's just trying to avoid as much about it as possible until she can see it.

either you messed up bad or you plan on doing so. Good man.
I don't even know who got married.
(04-29-2011 11:17 AM)Tigerbert Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-29-2011 11:14 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote: [ -> ]I don't even know who got married.

Hulk Hogan and Miss Elizabeth


Miss Elizabeth
RIP
May 1, 2003
(04-29-2011 08:20 AM)RoyBoy1978 Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-29-2011 07:28 AM)ByrdDogX Wrote: [ -> ]Complete waste of time.

Some people like it, some don't. It's your opinion.

I'm pretty sure its fact, but thanks for the input.
(04-29-2011 09:52 AM)Tigerbert Wrote: [ -> ]In the historical context of the British monarchy I think it's pretty interesting even though they have no governing authority.

Just like any media sensation the press is getting worked up and over-hyped into a frenzy over the story lines. In a way, this is what Charles and Diana were supposed to be. Charles was to be the first King of England since 1952 but after the grandeur of their globally televised wedding followed by the disappointment of their marriage and then the death of " The People's Princess" the monarchy was embarrassed and in tatters. Now, you have Diana's oldest son in line to be the next King as he marries a woman "of the people" although a non-royal which makes her all the more endearing to British citizens. The similarities are striking.

Media is going to take to that like a moth to the flame. All that said, I slept in this morning

Charles is still in line to be the next king...FWIW. William would assume the throne after Charles.
(04-29-2011 06:43 AM)oldmangrizz Wrote: [ -> ]I don't get it. Why would anyone here (in the U.S.) care? What possible logical reason would you have for watching it? Yet, it's all over the television. Why don't we get more Three Stooges, W.C. Fields, or Laurel and Hardy?

I'll watch the DVR of it tonight. I like the pagentry, the tradition, etc. They've only been doing this for 1400 years.
(04-29-2011 06:43 AM)oldmangrizz Wrote: [ -> ]I don't get it. Why would anyone here (in the U.S.) care? What possible logical reason would you have for watching it? Yet, it's all over the television. Why don't we get more Three Stooges, W.C. Fields, or Laurel and Hardy?

You must be a dude. My wife has it taking up 8 hours on the DVR.
And why couldn't I have a full orchestra at my wedding??? And why couldn't Elton John come?
(04-29-2011 12:40 PM)99Tiger Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-29-2011 09:52 AM)Tigerbert Wrote: [ -> ]In the historical context of the British monarchy I think it's pretty interesting even though they have no governing authority.

Just like any media sensation the press is getting worked up and over-hyped into a frenzy over the story lines. In a way, this is what Charles and Diana were supposed to be. Charles was to be the first King of England since 1952 but after the grandeur of their globally televised wedding followed by the disappointment of their marriage and then the death of " The People's Princess" the monarchy was embarrassed and in tatters. Now, you have Diana's oldest son in line to be the next King as he marries a woman "of the people" although a non-royal which makes her all the more endearing to British citizens. The similarities are striking.

Media is going to take to that like a moth to the flame. All that said, I slept in this morning

Charles is still in line to be the next king...FWIW. William would assume the throne after Charles.

You're correct. For some reason I was thinking Charles couldn't assume the throne because of he divorce from Diana although he very well could abdicate the throne and pass it on to his son.
Royal wedding? Queen Latifah got married?
(04-29-2011 01:02 PM)oakland steve Wrote: [ -> ]Royal wedding? Queen Latifah got married?

You hated on Queen Latifah and WeightWatchers or something on the Vernon Show a few years ago. You are a bad man and should be avoided.


The chick getting married today is a mega babe.
And why haven't the women chimed in on this!?
Pages: 1 2 3
Reference URL's