03-27-2011, 11:03 PM
03-28-2011, 11:40 AM
I saw where Green Bay got smoked by Baylor :0
03-28-2011, 11:49 AM
(03-28-2011 11:40 AM)Robert C Wrote: [ -> ]I saw where Green Bay got smoked by Baylor :0
I thought they did quite well, losing by only 10. A & M beat Georgia by around 40 in the other game.
03-28-2011, 01:11 PM
(03-27-2011 11:03 PM)mjs Wrote: [ -> ]4 one seeds and 3 two seeds in the Elite 8.
I noticed the same thing. #1's and #2's were completely blowing out the #15's and #16's by 35+ while in the men's those #15's and #16's can stay in the game for at least a half.
I think the difference is size. The highly ranked women's teams all have a major size advantage (and there are just simply not that many tall girls period) and it's not quite that much contrast with the men's teams. I mean even SWAC teams have 6'-9" players with size...but in Women's nobody has any good 6'4" plus post players except the top 10 teams in the country and after that it's a huge dropoff.
You see the same thing in high school girls basketball. Lot's of embarrassing blowouts in the girls games and not a whole lot in the boys games.
03-28-2011, 01:13 PM
(03-28-2011 11:49 AM)mjs Wrote: [ -> ](03-28-2011 11:40 AM)Robert C Wrote: [ -> ]I saw where Green Bay got smoked by Baylor :0
I thought they did quite well, losing by only 10. A & M beat Georgia by around 40 in the other game.
I agree...I was surprised they stayed within 10 points of Baylor!
I did see where size played a huge factor which I knew it would as Griner burned them for 40.
03-28-2011, 02:44 PM
I saw a piece on TV that compared Griner with other women players. According to the piece, the average woman player is 5'7", which makes Griner more than a foot taller than the average woman player. If you interpolated this over to the men, if a man was that much taller than the average, he'd be over 8 feet tall.