This board hasn't got anything right yet. Memphis, UCF, and now TCU are getting voted in tomorrow. That tells me ECU has as much chance as anyone.
(11-20-2010 12:14 AM)whitey Wrote: [ -> ]This board hasn't got anything right yet. Memphis, UCF, and now TCU are getting voted in tomorrow. That tells me ECU has as much chance as anyone.
WAC are picking them up?
whitey chill with the ECU threads buddy
I really don't get the purpose of this thread. Those rumors didn't originate here. So why generalize a whole board for posters picking up on rumors elsewhere. A couple of those rumors made it to to the press n junk.
The rumors were rumors and not fact, who would have ever guessed it.
Yawn! 
(11-20-2010 12:14 AM)whitey Wrote: [ -> ]This board hasn't got anything right yet. Memphis, UCF, and now TCU are getting voted in tomorrow. That tells me ECU has as much chance as anyone.
The board hasn't picked anything, a few people on the board have made predictions but the board hasn't picked anything.
(11-20-2010 07:08 AM)goodknightfl Wrote: [ -> ]The rumors were rumors and not fact, who would have ever guessed it.
Really? Because some of the rumors said that the Big East was expanding and TCU and UCF were some of the targets and you guys swore up and down that the Big East would never even look into expansion much less expand.
(11-20-2010 09:01 AM)CatsClaw Wrote: [ -> ] (11-20-2010 07:08 AM)goodknightfl Wrote: [ -> ]The rumors were rumors and not fact, who would have ever guessed it.
Really? Because some of the rumors said that the Big East was expanding and TCU and UCF were some of the targets and you guys swore up and down that the Big East would never even look into expansion much less expand.
My hunch is football only memberships for UCF and ECU.
I gave opinions here, not started rumors. I have never to the best of my memory said I heard that x = y-z.
(11-20-2010 03:18 AM)animus Wrote: [ -> ]I really don't get the purpose of this thread. Those rumors didn't originate here. So why generalize a whole board for posters picking up on rumors elsewhere. A couple of those rumors made it to to the press n junk.
Didn't mean for it to come out that way, I know no one here started the rumors. They just passed it on. Forgive me, you are more than welcome to delete this. Had a few too many last night. Thanks
(11-20-2010 10:44 AM)goodknightfl Wrote: [ -> ]I gave opinions here, not started rumors. I have never to the best of my memory said I heard that x = y-z.
Never said you did
best bet the league splits. then it will be made clear that football comes first. Thats when you will see more football recruits wanting to play at our universities. If I'm that good a football player, why would i want to go to a basketball first school.
i think most schools can be catergorized as more bb or more fb focused. meaning they are better known for one or the other and (for most) could be easaily put in one group or the other. even in the football centric b12 and sec there are members that are more bb schools.(kentucky and kansas for ex) im not sure how a non hybrid conf would change the image/rep/focus of those BE schools that tend to lean towards bb
(11-20-2010 10:44 AM)goodknightfl Wrote: [ -> ]I gave opinions here, not started rumors. I have never to the best of my memory said I heard that x = y-z.
actually it would be x=y-b or more appropriately y=x+b
that's standard equation form
I'm taking an algebra class right now
(11-20-2010 12:39 PM)whitey Wrote: [ -> ] (11-20-2010 10:44 AM)goodknightfl Wrote: [ -> ]I gave opinions here, not started rumors. I have never to the best of my memory said I heard that x = y-z.
Never said you did
I was answering CC.
(11-20-2010 02:30 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote: [ -> ] (11-20-2010 10:44 AM)goodknightfl Wrote: [ -> ]I gave opinions here, not started rumors. I have never to the best of my memory said I heard that x = y-z.
actually it would be x=y-b or more appropriately y=x+b
that's standard equation form
I'm taking an algebra class right now
Had you been paying attention in class, you would have known that accuracy in your formula is of key importance in the accuracy of your derivation of the function. The variables in question were X, Y, and Z - NOT X, Y and B...
If Z or B is a mathematical constant, you're f#cked...
Normal state of my life bit. :0)