CSNbbs

Full Version: Article: Big East needs to add more teams
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Sports
Friday October 29, 2010
Big East needs to add more teams to conference
by Jack Bogaczyk
Daily Mail Sports Editor
Charleston Daily Mail

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- Big East football coaches have been very vocal - almost to the point of ad nauseum - about the conference's need for a ninth football member to balance scheduling.

Most of the football schools' athletic directors also have joined in the chorus, which in recent months has gotten a new voice in West Virginia's AD of four months, Oliver Luck.

Well, balancing a league schedule at four home, four road games is a good idea, but the Big East hasn't wanted to simply add a ninth football team for the sake of adding a school with no juice - to a league that really needs some.

The Villanova situation may alleviate the schedule imbalance, with the Wildcats in the process of studying and then eventually deciding - the target is a December announcement - on whether to step up from one of the top programs in FBS to major college status and play pigskin with its Big East brethren.

In anticipation of that, Luck said the Big East office has asked its football schools "in particular because of the Villanova decision, to hold open opportunities to play Villanova, much like what happened when Connecticut came into the league, four one year, four the next year."

Well, whether the Wildcats jump into Big East football or not, finding a way to somehow add to the seven conference games the Big East teams play is going to become a more urgent matter. Why? It's because of what's happening elsewhere in Bowl Championship Series leagues.

Yes, it's a scheduling matter, but not exactly at the 4-4 situation the Big East coaches have mostly discussed publicly.

In most of those other BCS conferences, there is at least a consideration to moving from eight to nine league games. If that happens - and most predict it will in most leagues - then an eight-team Big East is pinched even further in its need for five non-conference games per school annually.

The Pac-10 (moving to the Pac-12) already plays nine games. The Big 12, down to 10 teams, will get to a football round-robin by playing nine.

ACC athletic directors seriously are discussing it. When the Big Ten grew to 12 teams with Nebraska this summer, Commissioner Jim Delany's accompanying remarks brought up the possibility of the Big Ten going to nine games as early as 2015.

Some of this is driven by what ADs call more "competitive balance" within a conference. Some of it is - big surprise here - rooted in dollars and sense.

With the price of bringing in sub-BCS level foes for no-return games going through the roof - for example, Florida State is paying Louisiana-Monroe $1.3 million next season - more BCS programs like the idea of playing another conference game instead
West Virginia, in need of a no-return game earlier this month, brought in UNLV for a Mountaineer Field-guarantee record of $740,000. When Bowling Green visits WVU next season, the dollar figure will be about the same, if not higher. South Florida got a veritable "steal" recently when it did a no-return deal with UTEP next season for $650,000.

Southeastern Conference schools, most of which can afford huge guarantees because of 90,000-seat (or larger) stadiums, have been paying $1 million to Sun Belt visitors already for the last couple of years.

Big East teams can't afford that - another reason to expand in football - because most of the stadiums are in the 60,000-seat range or smaller.

Luck said, "schedules are becoming more fluid," and that's only one reason he favors taking Big East football membership to 10 "sooner than later."

"It's no secret most of Big East athletic directors, if not all, feel like I do," he said. "We feel like eight is not enough, we've got to get to 10, but they got to be good schools."

Luck said the move by more conferences to nine league games is inevitable - and it may not stop there.

"Conferences are going to move to more conference games," Luck said recently in an interview in his WVU coliseum office, "and one driving force is just like we had here recently. UNLV. I'm sorry, it wasn't just a very attractive game, and it cost us $750,000 to fill that slot. That's not just happening here; it's happening everywhere.

"I don't think it's long before you start seeing 10 conference games (per school per season). They'll leave a spot for a (FBS game), and schools whose traditional rivals are separated by conference affiliation can still play (like Clemson-South Carolina, Georgia-Georgia Tech, Florida-Florida State).

"I think it's going toward the NFL model. The NFL has been tremendously successful in creating parity, where anybody can beat anybody else. College football still has some dynasties, and there are still clearly some one-sided matchups, whether we like it or not, but not so much in conferences anymore."

Luck said the cost of what he called "one-off" games will drive more conferences to adopt league schedules of nine dates ... or beyond.

"The fact is people are looking at more conference games, in different conferences," the West Virginia AD said. "I think doing nine is just a start ... I don't think they'll do nine for a long time. I think it's going to 10 or maybe even 11.

"Then you don't have a situation like you have now, where Ohio State and Michigan State don't play this year. You'd never have something like that in the NFL."
So, there's an urgency for Big East football to grow in more ways than one.

http://www.dailymail.com/Sports/201010281129
Nova will solve the scheduling issue shortterm. Who'll be around to address the issue longterm?
(10-29-2010 11:23 AM)Den Wrote: [ -> ]Nova will solve the scheduling issue shortterm. Who'll be around to address the issue longterm?

Penn State, ND, BC, Miami, and Maryland = 14 03-wink
Nova does NOT solve the issue because it will NOT enter Big East until a few years from now even if they agree to move up and also because until that time they will not play all Big East schools.
Also he is talking about NINE conference games which means 10 league teams, so unless we add Nova +1 it doesnt solve the question.

I hope if Nova says yes that we ADD TCU.
(10-29-2010 12:03 PM)Cubanbull Wrote: [ -> ]I hope if Nova says yes that we ADD TCU.
I hope we ADD TCU, no matter what 'nova does...
(10-29-2010 12:05 PM)bitcruncher Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-29-2010 12:03 PM)Cubanbull Wrote: [ -> ]I hope if Nova says yes that we ADD TCU.
I hope we ADD TCU, no matter what 'nova does...

Would you want to pair them with Houston?
I'd prefer SMU over Houston. They have a history of success, prior to the death penalty, and a pretty good size alumni base just waiting for a chance to cheer the Ponies on again. I think they'd be able to make a big comeback with BCS affiliation...
Gotta have pairs so when all the Olympic sports teams go west, they can play two...
Well first and for most the FB schools need to split IMO, and then either hit the high rollers hard or settle for up and comers who are on the cusp of the BCS now in Central Florida, East Carolina, TCU, Houston. Now I don't mean these teams are BCS contenders except TCU, but they are in a conference that sits just outside of the BCS conferences. The high roller approach would be going hard and heavy towards Kansas, Missouri, KSU, ISU or some sort of combination. I would prefer just Kansas & Missouri, but most likely Kansas is going to tied to KSU due to politics, but the overall solution would be creating a 14 all sports conference then you will have the making of a true identity amongst your peers.

For one of these models is going to be the future of the Big East Football Schools. Which one who knows, but it is going to happen I assure you for the hybrid can not keep going for it is whats killing the FB schools as we speak.

Here is my line up, but I prefer the 14 team all sport conference.

Model #1 12 teams

NorthEast Division

WVU
Pitt
Syracuse
Rutgers
UConn
Villanova

SouthWest Division

Louisville
Cincinnati
USF
TCU
Missouri
Kansas


Model #2 14 teams

NorthEast Division

WVU
Pitt
East Carolina
Syracuse
Rutgers
UConn
Villanova

SouthWest Division

Louisville
Cincinnati
USF
TCU
Missouri
Kansas
Memphis


Mode #3 16 teams

NorthEast Division

WVU
Pitt
East Carolina
Syracuse
Rutgers
UConn
Villanova
Cincinnati

SouthWest Division

Louisville
Central Florida
USF
TCU
Missouri
Kansas
Memphis
Kansas State



Or some sort of zipper effect with this one I included Houston in a 16 team scenario which can be replaced with KSU.

WVU / Pittsburgh
Louisville / Cincinnati
Syracuse / Rutgers
UConn / Villanova
ECU / Memphis
USF / UCF
Kansas / Missouri
TCU / Houston
This is the smartest article I've seen on the expansion topic in a long time.
(10-29-2010 01:52 PM)JunkYardCard Wrote: [ -> ]This is the smartest article I've seen on the expansion topic in a long time.
Jack Bogaczyk is pretty sharp, and well tapped into WVU too...
(10-29-2010 02:40 PM)bitcruncher Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-29-2010 01:52 PM)JunkYardCard Wrote: [ -> ]This is the smartest article I've seen on the expansion topic in a long time.
Jack Bogaczyk is pretty sharp, and well tapped into WVU too...

Apparently so. What he says plays right into why the football schools might be capitulating on actually paying Villanova to move up. If the other five BCS conferences all go to 9 conference games or more, it will be almost impossible for the Big East to fill out its schedule without each school paying for a "one off" game at least every other year.

So, why not just pay Villanova half of that? Which is what their cut of the BCS money would probably work out to be. That way everyone wins.
in that 16 team league i would swap houston for E caralina then move lousiville into NE league i would like it better that way. Lou a lil outa place but you would be in a super conf. so that would make up for it
(10-29-2010 12:27 PM)BigOwensboroCard Wrote: [ -> ]Well first and for most the FB schools need to split IMO, and then either hit the high rollers hard or settle for up and comers who are on the cusp of the BCS now in Central Florida, East Carolina, TCU, Houston. Now I don't mean these teams are BCS contenders except TCU, but they are in a conference that sits just outside of the BCS conferences. The high roller approach would be going hard and heavy towards Kansas, Missouri, KSU, ISU or some sort of combination. I would prefer just Kansas & Missouri, but most likely Kansas is going to tied to KSU due to politics, but the overall solution would be creating a 14 all sports conference then you will have the making of a true identity amongst your peers.

For one of these models is going to be the future of the Big East Football Schools. Which one who knows, but it is going to happen I assure you for the hybrid can not keep going for it is whats killing the FB schools as we speak.

Here is my line up, but I prefer the 14 team all sport conference.

Model #1 12 teams

NorthEast Division

WVU
Pitt
Syracuse
Rutgers
UConn
Villanova

SouthWest Division

Louisville
Cincinnati
USF
TCU
Missouri
Kansas


Model #2 14 teams

NorthEast Division

WVU
Pitt
East Carolina
Syracuse
Rutgers
UConn
Villanova

SouthWest Division

Louisville
Cincinnati
USF
TCU
Missouri
Kansas
Memphis


Mode #3 16 teams

NorthEast Division

WVU
Pitt
East Carolina
Syracuse
Rutgers
UConn
Villanova
Cincinnati

SouthWest Division

Louisville
Central Florida
USF
TCU
Missouri
Kansas
Memphis
Kansas State



Or some sort of zipper effect with this one I included Houston in a 16 team scenario which can be replaced with KSU.

WVU / Pittsburgh
Louisville / Cincinnati
Syracuse / Rutgers
UConn / Villanova
ECU / Memphis
USF / UCF
Kansas / Missouri
TCU / Houston


i doubt that a split occurs, this league seems bent on having the basketball hybrid...
(10-29-2010 03:55 PM)papablastter Wrote: [ -> ]in that 16 team league i would swap houston for E caralina then move lousiville into NE league i would like it better that way. Lou a lil outa place but you would be in a super conf. so that would make up for it

The 16 team model I suggested does have East Carolina in it as well as the 14 team model, and if you put together a realistic 12 model they are going to be included as well IMO. Louisville does not belong amongst the northeastern schools, but does need to be with the southern portion more so for recruiting purposes which ties them to many states they are recruiting out of especially Florida.
BigOwensboroCard I like the way your thinking. I have some similar thoughts.

The safest bet is going to 10 since we play 18 BB games with 16 team. Add 2 full round robin. TCU and Houston. Want a new market vs SMU and a local Rival ala SEC/ACC style.

The shoot for the moon without causing the othe BCS conferences to jump into the game would be to get Kansas and Kansas State to come over. They were almost left out, great BB. I like zipper for teams to keep balance of recruiting. Add UCF, TCU, Houston, Temple. Go to 14 teams, two division with 9 games with 1 fixed rival. Keep the same divisions for BB add in BB teams, play all in your division, fixed rival, plus 7 from other divsion

Black Division: Louisville, WVU, Kansas, Temple, UCONN, TCU, UCF.........BB add Villanova, Marquette, Providence, St. John
Blue Division: Cincinatti, Pitt, Kansas State, Rutgers, Syracuse, Houston, USF..........BB add Georgetown, Depaul, Seton Hall, ND


Now possiblity of Kansas/Kansas State leaving may be low.... they say no then stop at 12 or add ECU and Southern Miss.

If we go to 16 with Kansas and Missouri then go ahead and get Iowa State. Play in 4 pod's. Play 9 Games, 3 in Pod, 3 fixed rival in each other pod, 3 others.....

Big East
East North South West
Louisville UCONN UCF Missouri
Cincinatti Syracuse Houston Kansas
Temple Rutgers TCU Kansas State
WVU Pitt USF Iowa State


Hopefully Texas and OU keep the Big 12 intact by taking BYU Colorado State Tulsa Tulane Boise State Wyoming
Very good article.

Thanks for posting it Jackson.

04-cheers
Great find Jackson, thank god there are people writing articles like this. We need to add TCU no matter what. After that, I guess Villanova is the safe pickup but I'd prefer another All-Sports team.
Would somebody please explain to me how, if the other BCS leagues are going to be going to 9 and 10 and 11 game conference schedules, that wouldn't benefit the Big East? Just by using simple logic, wouldn't the fact that the other BCS leagues have less room on their respective schedules actually drive down the costs associated with bringing in cupcakes?

I'm pretty sure that it would.

Also, I am unconvinced that the Penn States and Ohio States of the world are going to pass on their $13 million paydays for home games because Arkansas State wants $1.1 million instead of the $800,000 they used to command.

That does not mean that expansion is necessarily a bad idea, it's just not a good idea for the reasons listed above.
Saw this format on another forum:

Football:

OBE: West Virginia, Pitt, Syracuse, Rutgers, UConn, Villanova
NBE: Louisville, Cincinnati, TCU, Houston, USF, Memphis (would prefer Memphis for basketball reasons)

Basketball:

OBE: West Virginia, Pitt, Syracuse, Rutgers, UConn, Villanova, Georgetown, Seton Hall, Providence, St. Johns

NBE: Louisville, Cincinnati, TCU, Houston, USF, Memphis, Depaul, Marquette, Notre Dame, Butler

Everyone plays everyone in their division once, and all but one of the opposing division once, which would be an improvement over the stupid unbalanced schedules.

That would be a sick hoops league and solid in football, but most importantly, would have an enormous about of DMA reach, resulting in big dollars from the networks.
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's