Ohio laid an egg today at home vs Kent State. Offense never showed putting up negative yardage rushing and throwing 3 picks. Kent State defense won this game. Kent State wanted this game more and Ohio packed it in in the fourth after a couple questionable coaching decisions by Solich backfired. Excuses of the flu and injury, but Kent has also had plenty of injuries. Ohio didn't show up today and made poor decisions in the red zone. Kent State now moves into second half game behind Temple.
I wouldn't exactly call 20-11 a blowout...
OU had a late punt return for a TD, but was totally dominated on both sides of the ball. Their offensive stats will be shocking. They simply had no offense.
(10-24-2009 04:15 PM)TempleU22 Wrote: [ -> ]I wouldn't exactly call 20-11 a blowout...
Then you obviously didn't watch the game. It was 20-3 and the last TD (a long punt return) should've been called back on a couple illegal blocks and there was another KSU interception lost to a video replay.
Okay, and your point is? 20-3 isn't even really that big of a blowout. Somebody control this guy from tooting his own horn.
Uh, the thread title was created by an OU fan.
Maybe not a blowout but they certainly controlled it. The post started by an OPU fan, not a KSU fan, so shut up and worry about your own game.
(10-24-2009 04:44 PM)axeme Wrote: [ -> ]Uh, the thread title was created by an OU fan.
Yeah, hats off to him. Then you guys came in tooting your own horns... I won't even address Polish Hammer any more from here on out. He's shown just how immature he really is.
Shame we'll miss out on such mature (or is it manure?) banter from you.
TempleU22 Wrote:JHG, don't even deal with this guy. He's a grade A douche-bag.
(10-24-2009 04:46 PM)TempleU22 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2009 04:44 PM)axeme Wrote: [ -> ]Uh, the thread title was created by an OU fan.
Yeah, hats off to him. Then you guys came in tooting your own horns... I won't even address Polish Hammer any more from here on out. He's shown just how immature he really is.
No, you came in trying to piss on someone else's win.
(10-24-2009 05:08 PM)axeme Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2009 04:46 PM)TempleU22 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2009 04:44 PM)axeme Wrote: [ -> ]Uh, the thread title was created by an OU fan.
Yeah, hats off to him. Then you guys came in tooting your own horns... I won't even address Polish Hammer any more from here on out. He's shown just how immature he really is.
No, you came in trying to piss on someone else's win.
By saying it's wasn't a blowout? Geez, get over yourself. It was a great win.
Not one KSU fan called it a blowout. An OU fan called it a blowout. Try reading. Even PH said "not a blowout."
With Ohio's offense a 17 point lead in the 4th was a blowout. That's like a 30 point lead with the futility of Ohio's offense today. We got our butts kicked bad no ifs ands or butts. negative yards rushing says it all. You can't put enough lipstick on this pig to make it look like a close game because that stats are so one sided. Ohio should have be shut out in this one. Kent State gave us the 3 and then a garbage time score late after the game was over.
Wow, so you didn't use the term blowout? That's cool.
You and Polish hammer both replied to my post claiming it wasn't a blowout.
'Then you obviously didn't watch the game. It was 20-3 and the last TD (a long punt return) should've been called back on a couple illegal blocks and there was another KSU interception lost to a video replay.'
'OU had a late punt return for a TD, but was totally dominated on both sides of the ball. Their offensive stats will be shocking. They simply had no offense.'
But forgive me for interpreting that as you guys arguing with me about whether it was a blowout or not. That clearly wasn't your intent.
Just shut up already jag off, you;d think you'd at least get the W over Toledo before popping off but then again we know better.
(10-24-2009 05:20 PM)Polish Hammer Wrote: [ -> ]Just shut up already jag off, you;d think you'd at least get the W over Toledo before popping off but then again we know better.
Because the game with Toledo has so much to do about whether or not this game was a blowout, correct?
I'll just take it as you not having a response.
No, because Toledo's W tonight will neuter Temple and we won't need to hear your nonsense for a while. You and your posse just added a few more Toledo fans for the night.
Yeah, I'll be so ashamed if we lose to Toledo. I won't even be able to garner enough courage to write on a message board.
(10-24-2009 05:28 PM)TempleU22 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2009 05:20 PM)Polish Hammer Wrote: [ -> ]Just shut up already jag off, you;d think you'd at least get the W over Toledo before popping off but then again we know better.
Because the game with Toledo has so much to do about whether or not this game was a blowout, correct?
I'll just take it as you not having a response.
Once you have seen more than 6 or 7 football games in your life, you will know that games can be a case of domination, regardless of the score. In this case, everyone who saw the game agrees that it was pretty one-sided. You, on the other hand, who did not see the game want to argue that it wasn't one-sided because it burns you that KSU played a terrific game and you don't like our fans. Wah. Wah. Wah.
Funny how every thread becomes a bunch of Temple nonsense when the thread has nothing to do with Temple. You do realize how pathetic you look here, don't you?
I guess you probably don't.