IamQ Wrote:Airport KC Wrote:The fact that BG and Miami were in on this guy and the finalists were CMU and Ohio tells me that recruits don't really care about MAC football traditions.
I guess you could make a strong argument for CMU being a traditional MAC power however during the entire Marshall era they were down big.
CMU's recruiting success is correlated with its current success not what the program did in the 90's or 80's.
In the mid 80's Miami and BG were far ahead of Ohio's football program. Ohio's press box was an 8' x 8' wooden. Miami and BG played in 30,000 seat stadiums while Peden was maybe 15,000.
Today Ohio has the better facility, big name coach, and better support. There is not one element of BG or Miami's program that is superior at this point.
Bowling Green has only 2 MAC Championships since 1985.
Miami has only 2 MAC Championships since 1977.
MAC tradition of Miami and BG is seriously overrated.
Ohio has the better facility...for the 80's. Stop by the Sebo Center the next time your in BG. Miami has alot better facilities too then currently at Ohio.
You are absolutely incorrect.
I will give BG credit with Sebo as a serious improvement. The stadium is vastly improved with Sebo and the other changes made.
MAC Stadiums by rank.
1.Temple (nfl)
2.Akron (new and fantastic)
3.Western Michigan (IPF and everything)
4.Ohio (huge tower and beautiful grounds)
5.Toledo (glass bowl tower)
6.Ball State (beautiful press tower and grounds)
7.Bowling Green (Sebo Center)
8.Northern Illinois (Yordon Center)
9.Eastern Michigan (huge)
10.Buffalo (relatively new)
11.Central Michigan (very solid)
12.Kent State (Party Decks!)
13.Miami
I would say Miami is the worst of all current MAC stadiums following the improvements at Kent and Akron.
Here is why I rate Miami's stadium so low:
1.The stadium has no weight center, no luxury suites, no indoor practice facility. There is no way you can rate it ahead of most of the MAC which has these elements as part of the stadium.
2.Exterior is far from fancy mixture of concrete and brick. The cradle of coaches plaza is alright but the exterior of the main grandstand does not match and looks dated.
3.Miami's press tower isn't a 8' by 8' wooden but its small and outdated looking. Compared with Ball State or even what EMU has its a clear notch below. Its light year's below Toledo or Ohio have.
4.Unbalanced home and away sides. The home side of Miami's stadium is 2.5 times larger taller than the away side. Then one of the endzone sections has seats at a much smaller size. There is a lack of symmetry across all seating at the stadium and I think that is a slight negative.
Contrast Miami's configuration with that of Bowling Green where all the seating is concentrated in two even sized decks. Then with the addition of Sebo it creates a nice horseshoe effect.