CSNbbs

Full Version: MAC O-sive/D-sive Scoring Leaders & Records (10/29/07)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
=>10/29/07 MAC Team Offensive/Defensive Scoring Leaders & Records

OVERALL TEAM SCORING OFFENSE
1. Toledo 36.333
2. BSU 32.333
3. CMU 32.222
4. Ohio U. 29.778
5. RedwingTom State University (RUTS) 29.25
6. WMU 27.556
7. Buffalo 24
8. Kent 22.444
9. Temple 20.375
10. EMU 20.222
11. Akron 19.25
12. Miami 19.222
13. NIU 15.778

OVERALL TEAM SCORING DEFENSE
1. Miami 25.778ppg
2. BSU 26.333
3. EMU 26.444
4. Buffalo 27.333
5. Akron 28.375
6. Temple 28.875
7. Kent 29.889
8. Ohio U. 30.556
9. NIU 32
10. WMU 32.333
11. RUTS 34.375
12. CMU 38.33
13. Toledo 40.444

OVERALL TEAM VICTORY MARGIN
1. BSU 6.0ppg
2. Ohio U. –0.778
3. Buffalo –3.333
4. Toledo -4
5. WMU –4.778
6. RUTS –5.125
7. CMU –6.111
8. EMU –6..222
9. Miami –6.556
10. Kent –7.444
11. Temple –8.5
12. Akron –9.125
13. NIU –16.222

MAC GAMES ONLY TEAM SCORING OFFENSE
1. CMU 46.5ppg
2. Toledo 44
3. BSU 33
4. Ohio U. 32.2
5. Buffalo 31.2
6. RUTS 30
7. WMU 30
8. Miami 24.5
-- EMU 24.5
10. WMU 24.4
11. Akron 24
12. Kent 23.6
13. NIU 12.6

MAC GAMES ONLY TEAM SCORING DEFENSE
1. Miami 16ppg
2. Buffalo 21.8
3. BSU 25
4. WMU 25.2
5. EMU 26.75
6. Akron 27
7. CMU 27.75
8. Temple 28.4
9. Kent 28.8
10. NIU 31.8
11. RUTS 35
12. Ohio U. 35.2
13. Toledo 39.6

MAC GAMES ONLY TEAM VICTORY MARGIN
1. CMU 18.75ppg
2. Buffalo 9.4
3. Miami 8.5
4. BSU 8
5. Toledo 4.4
6. WMU –0.8
7. EMU –2.25
8. Ohio U. -3
-- Akron-3
10. RUTS -5
11. Kent –5.2
12. Temple –7.2
13. NIU –19.2

TOTAL OVERALL DIVISION & LEAGUE SCORING OFFENSE
East 23.5ppg
West 27.426
MAC Overall 25.36

TOTAL OVERALL DIVISION & LEAGUE SCORING DEFENSE
East 29.25ppg
West 32.648
MAC Overall 30.86

TOTAL OVERALL DIVISION & LEAGUE VICTORY MARGIN
East –5.75ppg
West –5.222
MAC Overall –5.5

TOTAL MAC GAMES ONLY DIVISION & LEAGUE SCORING OFFENSE
East 26.719ppg
West 30.5
MAC Overall 28.483

TOTAL MAC GAMES ONLY DIVISION & LEAGUE SCORING DEFENSE
East 27.594ppg
West 29.5
MAC Overall 28.483

TOTAL MAC GAMES ONLY DIVISION & LEAGUE VICTORY MARGIN
East –0.875ppg
West 1
MAC Overall 0.0

***

MAC CROSS DIVISION RECORD*
East 5-3
West 3-5
MAC Overall 8-8

OOC BCS RECORD#
East 3-17
West 1-16
MAC Overall 4-33

OOC NON-BCS FBS (Formerly DI-A) RECORD@
East 3-3
West 4-0
MAC Overall 7-3

OOC FCS (Formerly DI-AA) RECORD^
East 2-0
West 3-2
MAC Overall 5-2

OOC FBS RECORD#@
East 6-20
West 5-16
MAC Overall 11-36

OOC TOTAL NON-BCS RECORD (FBS & FCS)#^
East 5-3
West 7-2
MAC Overall 12-5

OVERALL OOC RECORD#@^
East 8-20
West 8-18
MAC Overall 16-38

OVERALL RECORD (NOT INCLUDE DIVISION GAMES)*#@^
East 13-23
West 11-23
MAC Overall 24-46

* = Includes games of MAC East Teams vs. MAC West teams (not MAC East v. MAC East or MAC West v. MACWest).
# = Includes games vs. BCS teams (ACC, Big East, Big 10, Big 12, PAC 10, SEC, & Notre Dame).
@ = Includes games vs. Non-BCS FBS (formerly DI-A) teams (Conf USA, MWC, Sun Belt, WAC, & other independents).
^ = Includes games vs. FCS (formerly DI-AA) teams.

***

mollautt’s COMPUTER RANKINGS

1. CMU 10.469
2. BSU 7.333
3. Buffalo 5.156
4. Miami 4
5. Toledo 1.6
6. WMU –2.126
7. Ohio U. –2.259
8. EMU –3.574
9. RUTS –5.042
-- Akron –5.042
11. Kent –5.948
12. Temple –7.633
13. NIU –18.207

NOTE Theoretical victory margin can be obtain be taking subtracting the ranking score of two scores and then dividing by two. Ex. #1 CMU 10.469 + #13 NIU –18.207 = 28.676. 28.676 / 2 = 14.338. As such, rounding down, CMU would be favored over NIU by 14 points.
Reference URL's