CSNbbs

=>10/15/07 MAC Team Offensive/Defensive Scoring Leaders & Records

OVERALL TEAM SCORING OFFENSE
1. BSU 35.256ppg
2. CMU 33.571
3. WMU 31.857
4. Toledo 30.714
5. BUGS 29.333
6. Ohio U. 27.143
7. Buffalo 25.429
8. Kent 21.429
9. EMU 21.286
10. Akron 20.571
11. Miami 20.429
12. Temple 19.857
13. NIU 16.857

OVERALL TEAM SCORING DEFENSE
1. NIU 24.867ppg
2. Miami 26.286
3. BSU 26.571
4. Kent 28.143
5. Akron 28.742
6. Ohio U. 29.286
7. EMU 30
8. Temple 30.571
9. Buffalo 30.857
10. CMU 34.714
11. WMU 35
12. BUGS 36.167
13. Toledo 43.286

OVERALL TEAM VICTORY MARGIN
1. BSU 8.714ppg
2. CMU –1.143
3. Ohio U. –2.143
4. WMU –3.143
5. Buffalo –5.429
6. Miami –5.857
7. Kent –6.714
8. BUGS –6.833
9. NIU -8
10. Akron –8.143
11. EMU –8.714
12. Temple –10.714
13. Toledo –12.571

MAC GAMES ONLY TEAM SCORING OFFENSE
1. CMU 48.333ppg
2. Toledo 35.667
3. BSU 34.5
4. Buffalo 32.5
5. WMU 32.333
6. BUGS 31
7. Akron 28.667
8. Ohio U. 27.667
9. Miami 27
10. EMU 26.333
11. Kent 22
12. Temple 20.5
13. NIU 10.5

MAC GAMES ONLY TEAM SCORING DEFENSE
1. Miami 13.333ppg
2. NIU 22.25
3. Kent 24
4. Buffalo 24.75
5. BSU 25.5
6. CMU 26.333
7. WMU 26.667
8. Akron 27.333
9. Temple 31.25
10. EMU 35
11. Ohio U. 35.333
12. BUGS 41
13. Toledo 45.667

MAC GAMES ONLY TEAM VICTORY MARGIN
1. CMU 22ppg
2. Miami 13.667
3. BSU 9
4. Buffalo 7.75
5. WMU 5.667
6. Akron 1.333
7. Kent –2
8. Ohio U. –7.667
9. EMU –8.667
10. Toledo –10
-- BUGS -10
12. Temple –10.75
13. NIU –11.75

TOTAL OVERALL DIVISION & LEAGUE SCORING OFFENSE
1. West 28.262ppg
2. League 26.633
3. East 23.333

TOTAL OVERALL DIVISION & LEAGUE SCORING DEFENSE
1. East 29.875ppg
2. League 31.056
3. West 32.405

TOTAL OVERALL DIVISION & LEAGUE VICTORY MARGIN
1. West –4.143ppg
2. League –5.422
3. East –6.542

TOTAL MAC GAMES ONLY DIVISION & LEAGUE SCORING OFFENSE
1. West 30.4ppg
2. League 28.524
3. East 26.818

TOTAL MAC GAMES ONLY DIVISION & LEAGUE SCORING DEFENSE
1. East 27.545ppg
2. League 28.524
3. West 29.6

TOTAL MAC GAMES ONLY DIVISION & LEAGUE VICTORY MARGIN
1. West 0.8ppg
2. League –0.0
3. East –0.727

***

MAC CROSS DIVISION RECORD*
East 5-1
West 1-5
MAC 6-6

OOC BCS RECORD#
East 3-15
West 1-12
MAC 4-27

OOC NON-BCS FBS (Formerly DI-A) RECORD@
East 3-3
West 4-0
MAC 7-3

OOC FCS (Formerly DI-AA) RECORD^
East 2-0
West 3-2
MAC 5-2

OOC FBS RECORD#@
East 6-18
West 5-12
MAC 11-30

OOC TOTAL NON-BCS RECORD (FBS & FCS)#^
East 5-3
West 7-2
MAC 12-5

OVERALL OOC RECORD#@^
East 8-18
West 8-14
MAC 16-32

OVERALL RECORD (NOT INCLUDE DIVISION GAMES)*#@^
East 13-19
West 9-19
MAC 22-38

* = Includes games of MAC East Teams vs. MAC West teams (not MAC East v. MAC East or MAC West v. MACWest).
# = Includes games vs. BCS teams (ACC, Big East, Big 10, Big 12, PAC 10, SEC, & Notre Dame).
@ = Includes games vs. Non-BCS FBS (formerly DI-A) teams (Conf USA, MWC, Sun Belt, WAC, & other independents).
^ = Includes games vs. FCS (formerly DI-AA) teams.

mollautt Wrote:=>10/15/07 MAC Team Offensive/Defensive Scoring Leaders & Records

OVERALL TEAM SCORING OFFENSE
1. BSU 35.256ppg
2. CMU 33.571
3. WMU 31.857
4. Toledo 30.714
5. BUGS 29.333
6. Ohio U. 27.143
7. Buffalo 25.429
8. Kent 21.429
9. EMU 21.286
10. Akron 20.571
11. Miami 20.429
12. Temple 19.857
13. NIU 16.857

That's where we are having our problems. The past few years NIU has had top 25 offenses, now we have one of the worst offenses in the nation.

mollautt Wrote:OVERALL TEAM SCORING DEFENSE
1. NIU 24.867ppg
2. Miami 26.286
3. BSU 26.571
4. Kent 28.143
5. Akron 28.742
6. Ohio U. 29.286
7. EMU 30
8. Temple 30.571
9. Buffalo 30.857
10. CMU 34.714
11. WMU 35
12. BUGS 36.167
13. Toledo 43.286

It's awesome that NIU's defense is still at the top even though the amount of injuries that have occurred on our defense. We have four freshmen and a sophomore playing on our D-Line, then losing our #1 LB Tim McCarthy early in the season, missing our #1 Safety Spencer Williamson for 5 games this season, and now our #1 CB Melvin Rice is serving a three-game suspension that started with WMU last weekend. All the experience these young players are getting are going to give NIU a bunch of experience on the defensive side of the ball.

=>Looking at the Miami gamenotes and going over the 2 deep for the game against Temple, I noticed the following about how young Miami's starters are at this point:

Offense

3 seniors (2 backups in 2 deep)
5 Juniors (1)
1 Sophomore (2)
2 Frosh (6)

Defense

0 Seniors (2 backups in 2 deep)
4 Juniors (2)
5 Sophomores (2)
2 Frosh (5)

Specialists [PK, P, LS, Holder, KO, PR, KR (2)]

0 Seniors (0 backups in 2 deep)
4 Juniors (1)
0 Sophomores (5)
4 Frosh (0)

http://www.cstv.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s_c...tes_102007

Of the starters listed for the Temple game, Miami will graduate only 3 of 30 combined starters [offense (11), defense (11), and specialists (8 )]. Those 3 being LT Charlie Norden, C Steve Meister, and TB Austin Sykes. Unfortunately, those 3 are key cogs in the nice running game Miami has had for the last few weeks.