Our D didn't look that bad. All things considered they held it together. If you give up 17 points you'd think you are going to win.
Pirkle looked good. Pruitt also looked pretty good.
Larson at times had problems shedding blocks, but still made some plays.
This team has a good D. Who would ever think that the D would be the best part of a NIU football team.
TheNEWguy Wrote:Our D didn't look that bad. All things considered they held it together. If you give up 17 points you'd think you are going to win.
Pirkle looked good. Pruitt also looked pretty good.
Larson at times had problems shedding blocks, but still made some plays.
This team has a good D. Who would ever think that the D would be the best part of a NIU football team.
I really liked the fact that Pruitt was up in the receivers face getting bumps at the LOS. Too often, our dbs give 10 yard cushions to the receivers.
Doggone Wrote:TheNEWguy Wrote:Our D didn't look that bad. All things considered they held it together. If you give up 17 points you'd think you are going to win.
Pirkle looked good. Pruitt also looked pretty good.
Larson at times had problems shedding blocks, but still made some plays.
This team has a good D. Who would ever think that the D would be the best part of a NIU football team.
I really liked the fact that Pruitt was up in the receivers face getting bumps at the LOS. Too often, our dbs give 10 yard cushions to the receivers.
I agree with you 100% there. It seems hes the only one who can be pyhsical enough because of his size.
I agree. I am cautiously optimistic because WMU does not look like a very good team to me, especially the offense.