I've noticed that scout has us ranked #11 in team recruiting. They avg. their ratings based on commitment's stars not LOI, at least for now. My thinking is that once they realize that Bogan is not apart of this class. Our rating should be listed at 4.25 rather than 4.00. This would tie us with, guess who? Indiana for 8th place. Talk about Ironic.
Quote:"The last day when we were about to leave, I just looked at (Markieff) and said, This is where it's at.'"
Rivals updated their class rankings, with Mayo and Jefferson signing with USC.
Last Wednesday, we were #12 with Rose, Robinson and Bogan. This time, we moved a whole spot up to #11 taking Bogan out and adding the Morris twins. One spot? Look at our players below and you'll see that we have one 5-star and three 4-star players and then wonder why the hell we're not in the top 6, much less the top 10. We certainly should have jumped Michigan St. and probably Indiana. I bet they're hedging their bets because the twins may go to prep school (I bet they don't). But if that's the case, they should have also included Taggart. It should be 'newcomers' to a program, not just HS or prep players.
http://rivalshoops.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=608798
Quote:then wonder why the hell we're not in the top 6, much less the top 10.
We may not be getting full credit for MM and MM because of the prep school possiblity/likelyhood which is well known by the services.