11-26-2005, 09:14 PM
Pages: 1 2
Anonymous
11-26-2005, 09:22 PM
Is this what you were going to do?
Nevada 24
Fresno 16
Halftime
This means nothing about Toledo, so you Toledo fans don't try to make it seem like that. There is an upset brewing in Nevada though. If Fresno loses, they don't even win the WAC.
Nevada 24
Fresno 16
Halftime
This means nothing about Toledo, so you Toledo fans don't try to make it seem like that. There is an upset brewing in Nevada though. If Fresno loses, they don't even win the WAC.
11-26-2005, 09:42 PM
Thanks for the heads-up, RobertN. I didn't realize it was on.
Anonymous
11-26-2005, 09:45 PM
24-19 Nevada now.
Fresno gets the ball back.
Fresno gets the ball back.
11-26-2005, 09:45 PM
I don't know how that matters, even as an NIU fan. Fresno is definitely having a letdown after the huge game at USC, which they could have (and IMO should have) won. They are now within 5 and I expect them to come out with the victory now that the hangover period of this game is over.
11-26-2005, 09:51 PM
NIUHuskies86 Wrote:I don't know how that matters, even as an NIU fan. Fresno is definitely having a letdown after the huge game at USC, which they could have (and IMO should have) won. They are now within 5 and I expect them to come out with the victory now that the hangover period of this game is over.They only should have won if Reggie Bush wasn't on USC.
11-26-2005, 09:52 PM
Field Turf Wrote:Pinegar made 2 completely retarted throws or Fresno still wins, even with Bush on USC.NIUHuskies86 Wrote:I don't know how that matters, even as an NIU fan. Fresno is definitely having a letdown after the huge game at USC, which they could have (and IMO should have) won. They are now within 5 and I expect them to come out with the victory now that the hangover period of this game is over.They only should have won if Reggie Bush wasn't on USC.
11-26-2005, 09:59 PM
Why didn't Pat Hill get a 10 year contract extension for not getting killed by USC?
11-26-2005, 10:00 PM
NIUHuskies86 Wrote:Another difference between USC and Fresno - Leinhart doesn't tend to make retarted (sic) throws.Field Turf Wrote:Pinegar made 2 completely retarted throws or Fresno still wins, even with Bush on USC.NIUHuskies86 Wrote:I don't know how that matters, even as an NIU fan. Fresno is definitely having a letdown after the huge game at USC, which they could have (and IMO should have) won. They are now within 5 and I expect them to come out with the victory now that the hangover period of this game is over.They only should have won if Reggie Bush wasn't on USC.
11-26-2005, 10:00 PM
HuskieDan Wrote:Why didn't Pat Hill get a 10 year contract extension for not getting killed by USC?10?? He should have got 15 since he had to play them on the road!!
:D
11-26-2005, 10:07 PM
It looks like they borrowed the officials from the UT-BG game. Fresno was just given a touchdown when it was clear in real time that it was not a score. Unfortunately for the WAC, they don't have review. Though if it is the same officiating crew (MAC/WAC swap), the review apparently doesn't matter anyway.
11-26-2005, 10:16 PM
Roudebush Rocket Wrote:It looks like they borrowed the officials from the UT-BG game. Fresno was just given a touchdown when it was clear in real time that it was not a score. Unfortunately for the WAC, they don't have review. Though if it is the same officiating crew (MAC/WAC swap), the review apparently doesn't matter anyway.It was a make-up call for an earlier one they blew.
P.S. They have had some really good camera work tonight. Nothing like not seeing the play but the back of the fans heads in the camera.
11-26-2005, 10:19 PM
RobertN Wrote:Don't blame a cameraman for having a lousy spot for his stationary camera.Roudebush Rocket Wrote:It looks like they borrowed the officials from the UT-BG game. Fresno was just given a touchdown when it was clear in real time that it was not a score. Unfortunately for the WAC, they don't have review. Though if it is the same officiating crew (MAC/WAC swap), the review apparently doesn't matter anyway.It was a make-up call for an earlier one they blew.
P.S. They have had some really good camera work tonight. Nothing like not seeing the play but the back of the fans heads in the camera.
11-26-2005, 10:24 PM
HuskieDan Wrote:Fine. It wasn't his fault, itwas the stadiums fault.RobertN Wrote:Don't blame a cameraman for having a lousy spot for his stationary camera.Roudebush Rocket Wrote:It looks like they borrowed the officials from the UT-BG game. Fresno was just given a touchdown when it was clear in real time that it was not a score. Unfortunately for the WAC, they don't have review. Though if it is the same officiating crew (MAC/WAC swap), the review apparently doesn't matter anyway.It was a make-up call for an earlier one they blew.
P.S. They have had some really good camera work tonight. Nothing like not seeing the play but the back of the fans heads in the camera.
Dan, we need a press box like Nevada's. It is huge and very nice.
11-26-2005, 10:38 PM
RobertN Wrote:We need a lot of things. The office/lockerroom/meetingroom/trainingroom/academic support facility is only the first step - the team we just beat 42-7 already has that AND a beautiful indoor practice facility and nice press box. The position we're currently in given the facility disadvantage we're in is truly amazing.HuskieDan Wrote:Fine. It wasn't his fault, itwas the stadiums fault.RobertN Wrote:Don't blame a cameraman for having a lousy spot for his stationary camera.Roudebush Rocket Wrote:It looks like they borrowed the officials from the UT-BG game. Fresno was just given a touchdown when it was clear in real time that it was not a score. Unfortunately for the WAC, they don't have review. Though if it is the same officiating crew (MAC/WAC swap), the review apparently doesn't matter anyway.It was a make-up call for an earlier one they blew.
P.S. They have had some really good camera work tonight. Nothing like not seeing the play but the back of the fans heads in the camera.
Dan, we need a press box like Nevada's. It is huge and very nice.
Anonymous
11-26-2005, 10:44 PM
Wow Fresno is going to lose, and not win the WAC.
11-26-2005, 10:48 PM
G-FORCE Wrote:Wow Fresno is going to lose, and not win the WAC.Shhh, you are going to jinx Nevada. Fresno just scored to make it 38-35 w/2 point conversion) and are going for the onside kick.
11-26-2005, 10:55 PM
RobertN Wrote:Or not.G-FORCE Wrote:Wow Fresno is going to lose, and not win the WAC.Shhh, you are going to jinx Nevada. Fresno just scored to make it 38-35 w/2 point conversion) and are going for the onside kick.
11-26-2005, 10:59 PM
HuskieDan Wrote:Hey, it wasn't that far off from being recovered by Fresno. It was a really good kick and a bad attempt at a catch by the Nevada guy.RobertN Wrote:Or not.G-FORCE Wrote:Wow Fresno is going to lose, and not win the WAC.Shhh, you are going to jinx Nevada. Fresno just scored to make it 38-35 w/2 point conversion) and are going for the onside kick.
11-26-2005, 11:02 PM
RobertN Wrote:End result?HuskieDan Wrote:Hey, it wasn't that far off from being recovered by Fresno. It was a really good kick and a bad attempt at a catch by the Nevada guy.RobertN Wrote:Or not.G-FORCE Wrote:Wow Fresno is going to lose, and not win the WAC.Shhh, you are going to jinx Nevada. Fresno just scored to make it 38-35 w/2 point conversion) and are going for the onside kick.
Pages: 1 2