CSNbbs

Full Version: Pro-UCF writer calls Toledo and Kent "Patsies"...
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Keep in mind, this is from the "Opinion" section, but still...

UCF Future calls Toledo (MAC Champs) a Patsy-cupcake team Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder when UCF will shut up and quit disrespecting the MAC. I am embarrassed. They also call Kent St a patsy as well.

Central Florida Future - Opinion
Issue: 10/01/02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How to fire up UCF fans

A new castle, a new horse and a scholarship giveaway failed to entice fans in large numbers to enter the Citrus Bowl last Saturday for UCF's first home football game of the season.
Many UCF students did make the trip downtown. But others remained more interested in the tailgating festivities outside the stadium than in the touchdowns that allowed the Golden Knights to score a 48-17 victory over Liberty.

Even 200 freshmen — bribed with free food, T-shirts and prizes to board a bus to the game in the first-ever "Freshmen Frenzy" promotion — failed to significantly bolster attendance that UCF officials claimed was 20,000 (even though only 18,600 fans were counted through the turnstiles).

UCF officials, who still believe promotions are the best way to garner fan support, seriously misunderstand the notion of competitive sports.

No amount of promotions can convince people to become UCF fans, because football games aren't about free food and cash giveaways, pre-game shows and colorful props.

Sports, football especially, are about the heart-stopping throws, the record-setting plays, the last-minute touchdowns that instantly change the outcome of a game. Real sports fans know that the only reason to go into a stadium is to catch a game worth seeing.

When UCF plays patsies such as Liberty, Toledo, and Kent State , when the outcome is as predictable as Florida's fall climate, the thrill of the game disappears. Watching UCF destroy a weak opponent like the Liberty Flames is like watching a fox chase a rabbit around in a cage, knowing the rabbit doesn't stand a chance. Promotions simply can't compensate for that and shouldn't have to.

While last year's "Fill the Bowl" promotion drew 50,220 fans, creating one of the largest crowds ever for a UCF home game, it had little do with the success of the marketing maneuver.

Rather, it had everything to do with the fact that UCF faced a decent opponent in Virginia Tech,. Suddenly the stadium was filled with fans who held their breath, crossed their fingers, donned their Knights shirts and did everything in their power to support UCF, never knowing who would take the game, but aware that if UCF did, the win would mean something, and a loss still would be a noteworthy effort.

Point is, if UCF wants people to show up at football games, it will have to schedule more teams like Virginia Tech to get people to watch.

UCF will re-launch "Fill the Bowl" for the Nov. 2 home game, but it's hardly necessary, given that the Knight's opponent for that contest will be Syracuse. Forty thousand fans — the crowd UCF hopes to draw for "Fill the Bowl" — is a realistic attendance goal for such a distinguished opponent. Against Liberty, even 20,000 was something of a miracle.

It would be easy to pack the house for every home game if UCF played teams worth watching. As much fun as it is to extinguish a weaker opponent like the Flames, fans want a game and a win for the Knights that they can get fired up about.

This is the opinion of the Central Florida Future. UCF's School Newspaper

Kristy Shonka, Sports Editor
Email: sports@ucffuture.com
Phone: 407-447-4555 x161

The Central Florida Future
3361 Rouse. Rd, Suite 160
Orlando, FL 32817

WOW! Keep on talking it up, boys...Sheesh.

Guest

UCF fans are all over the Toledo board apologizing for that article. The writer is a dumb***, no doubt. But, unlike some places <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="tongue.gif" /> the fans aren't all yelling "AMEN" along with the dumb***.
God, what an idiot, please don't think that this article represents what informed UCF fans know/think about the MAC.
Odd,

Where is the Toledo Board??? Is it a different one than the College Sports Forum???
Hard to understand how anyone connected with a 1-3 team could call any opponent a patsie. Please thank the writer. It will make great bulletine board material when UT visits Orlando. All apologies by true UCF fans are accepted.
I was starting to get upset until I saw this...

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Kristy Shonka, Sports Editor </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"><img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="rolleyes.gif" />
"Kristy"? The Sports Editor??? You might want to think about switching majors. Maybe Home Ec. or an MRS. degree.....

Get a clue. Do your homework....
I emailed this bimbo...I asked her if she were willing to eat her words when some of these "patsies" destroyed her idea of the MAC...lmfao!
Nothing like providing a patsy with bulletin board material, eh? UCF has made Marshall and their fans look downright humble and grateful for their MAC membership. I thought no one could make Marshall's entry into the MAC look reasonable. MUg looks downright at home in the MAC compared to these guys. Did they ever really want to be in the MAC. The MAC should have gone after MTSU or Troy State. They would at least been grateful and happy to be in a solid conference. STINKING UCF INGRATES! P.S. There are many reasonable UCF fans here. It's your leadership that I am speaking to.

Guest

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by THUNDERstruck73:
Odd,

Where is the Toledo Board??? Is it a different one than the College Sports Forum???</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="http://www.toledorockets.com/message.htm" target="_blank">http://www.toledorockets.com/message.htm</a>
THUNDERstruck73, I think your beef should be with Kristy, not UCF fans in general. She's not our spokesperson and I sure as heck didn't help write that artice.
I know that Essency. I didn't realize that this rag was not affiliated with UCF until after I posted. I know these fools who post this nonsense are the minority, as are the eccentric Marshall fans...I feel that UCF fans in general are nice, quality people. <img border="0" alt="[Cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/cheers.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[wave]" title="" src="graemlins/wave.gif" />
What's the big deal? They are patsies.

Guest

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Stick4489:
What's the big deal? They are patsies.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">What would that make Marshall?

<a href="http://utrockets.ocsn.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/113001aab.html" target="_blank">http://utrockets.ocsn.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/113001aab.html</a>
<img border="0" alt="[NoNo]" title="" src="graemlins/nono.gif" />
Odd,

You shouldn't post links to such pornography on this site. Geez, the smut!!!!! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" />

Guest

I like this one best:

<a href="http://utrockets.ocsn.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/113001aab.html?pic=2" target="_blank">http://utrockets.ocsn.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/113001aab.html?pic=2</a>

<img border="0" alt="[Bow]" title="" src="graemlins/bow.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[Bow]" title="" src="graemlins/bow.gif" />
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by MACBuck:
I was starting to get upset until I saw this...

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Kristy Shonka, Sports Editor </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"><img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="rolleyes.gif" />
"Kristy"? The Sports Editor??? You might want to think about switching majors. Maybe Home Ec. or an MRS. degree.....

Get a clue. Do your homework....</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yeah, next thing you know we'll have broads doing play-by-play for football. Oh wait...

Gender equality run amuck. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Mad]" src="mad-flaming.gif" />

Guest

Yes, one bad article written by a woman discredits them all! Why can't they just be happy cooking our dinners and sweeping our floors? Barefoot and pregnant... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="rolleyes.gif" />
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Yes, one bad article written by a woman discredits them all! Why can't they just be happy cooking our dinners and sweeping our floors? Barefoot and pregnant </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I agree, one bad article doesn't discredit all women sports writers and broadcasters, but it doesn't help either.

I know there's good (see Robin Roberts) and bad (see Michelle Ta-wish I was a boy-a) females covering sports. There's also plenty of crappy guys covering sports as well.

But.....

Knowledge is power. To call Toledo a patsy is just ignorant. I say it again, do your homework. Listen, I bet every guy on this board could name 200 D-1A and 1AA college football teams off the top of their head. And I bet most could tell you what conference they're in, and maybe a little history.

You think Kristy can? I doubt it. Does that make her a poor journalist? Probably not. Does that make her unqualified to write about college football, namely the MAC? You bet it does...

<small>[ October 01, 2002, 04:37 PM: Message edited by: MACBuck ]</small>
This school paper sucks. First of all it is not affiliated w/UCF. This article has pissed off many UCF supporters and they have taken alot of emails concerning it as well. I sent an email to the editor and to my surprise not a response. The writer of this article obviously doesn't know jack $hit about college football and is one of our worthless students who doesn't even attend UCF games. This article in no way reflects the attitude of UCF fans.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by murox:
Yeah, next thing you know we'll have broads doing play-by-play for football. Oh wait...

Gender equality run amuck. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Mad]" src="mad-flaming.gif" /> </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Now, now... <img border="0" alt="[NoNo]" title="" src="graemlins/nono.gif" /> That's not a good attitude considering the possible commissioner of your future conference... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />

<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/cusa/2002-10-02-women-commish_x.htm" target="_blank">http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/cusa/2002-10-02-women-commish_x.htm</a>
Reference URL's