CSNbbs

Full Version: UCF Receivers Look For Success
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Central Florida wide receivers look for success in new system

By Eric Kernish, Central Florida Future
August 11, 2004
(U-WIRE) OVIEDO, Fla. -- During the offseason, the Central Florida football team experienced several changes in its coaching staff.

The one change that could possibly make the biggest impact on the Knights' offense was the hiring of new wide receivers coach D.J. McCarthy. Not only does he bring experience and knowledge of the position to the Knights, but he's also known for his reputation of developing stars out of the receivers he coaches.

One of McCarthy's biggest accomplishments as a receivers coach was during his tenure at Nevada, where he worked since 2000. He was credited for the growth and development of wide receiver Nate Burelson, who in 2002 caught a record-setting 138 passes to lead the nation in receptions. Burelson went on to set many Nevada and Western Athletic Conference records, all under the guidance of McCarthy. Currently, he is playing in the NFL for the Minnesota Vikings. Two other Nevada wide receivers coached by McCarthy -- Maurice Mann and Willie Johnson -- also accomplished making it to the NFL ranks.

According to McCarthy, the wide receivers he is working with at UCF possess a sufficient amount of talent, causing an intense competition among them. He believes the competition will ultimately influence them to play at a higher level in 2004.

"If you want to get guys to play to their best ability and play at their peak performance, you've got to create some type of competition," McCarthy said. "I think with the depth that we have at this position, the guys competing against each other will want to be the best."

McCarthy says the group of receivers he has inherited, particularly Tavaris Capers, Luther Huggins and Brandon Marshall, has made his job a lot easier. McCarthy credits former UCF wide receiver coach Sean Beckton for turning them into solid players.

"I came into a great situation," McCarthy said. "I thought all three of those guys were coached well by their former coach. He did a good job, and now it's my job to make sure that I can continue the way he left off and try to take them to another level."

The Knights plan to go with seniors Capers and Huggins as the team's starting tandem for the second straight year. In 2003, both were asked to take on the huge job of replacing former starting receivers Doug Gabriel and Jimmy Fryzel. As both receivers soon learned, replacing them was not going to be simple.

As it turned out, neither receiver had a great 2003 season due to the inconsistency of the Knights' offense, namely the quarterback position. This year, Capers and Huggins are both eager to get out on the field and prove to everyone what they are truly capable of.

After leading the team in both receptions (67), yards (585) and touchdowns (seven) in 2003, Capers is being looked upon to play a large role in the offense once again. In contrast to last season, the Knights hope to see Capers use his deep speed more often and make bigger plays. Last year he averaged a trifling 8.7 yards per catch, the lowest average out of any current wide receiver who caught more than 10 passes in 2003.

Huggins is another player expected to have a stellar season. After catching only 26 passes for 375 yards and two touchdowns last year, he will be looked upon to play a more significant role on offense, and will most likely remain the No. 2 receiver.

With both Huggins and Capers playing together for so long, the two have built chemistry on the field. Huggins says because they played in high school together, they both have a good idea what each other of them will do during games.

"We just know everything about each other since we've been together for so long," Huggins said. "We're always trying to encourage each other. If we make good plays, we congratulate each other. We make each other feel good, and then when we're down, we try to pick each other up. We're out there for each other."

Another receiver who excites the coaches is junior Brandon Marshall. In 2003, he showed signs of potential, finishing the season with 28 receptions for 377 yards, along with a pair of touchdowns. In the game against Florida Atlantic, Marshall showed his capabilities by compiling 104 yards on five receptions, including a 29-yard touchdown catch in the second quarter.

The Knights believe running a balanced offense will provide the passing game with more opportunities for big plays. However, they know it won't be easy without the arm of former UCF quarterback Ryan Schneider.

"You can't replace a Ryan Schneider," Huggins said. "I mean, he was like one of the greatest quarterbacks, other than Daunte [Culpepper], to come through Central Florida. But I think our offense this year complements our quarterbacks, because it mixes in the run and the pass. It's not just a sling-the-ball-all-day type of offense. We have mobile quarterbacks this year, and that's a big plus we didn't have last year."

Also looking to contribute to the offense in 2004 is sophomore receiver Mike Walker. As a freshman he caught 21 receptions for 337 yards. According to the coaching staff, Walker has the potential to be one of the best receivers on the team when all is said and done.

Andre Sumpter, who is coming off a season-ending knee injury, will also plan to earn playing time. He is considered to be very talented, but how well he recovers from his injury is the big question. The answer will determine just how much he plays.

Sophomore Brooks Turner and junior Al Peterson are also on the depth chart, and will compete for playing time. Freshman Sergiori Joachim and Chris Narsesian also plan to be in the mix.

The possibility of how good this receiver corps can be in 2004 has become a pleasant distraction for McCarthy. He says just thinking about it causes him to get all wound up.

"I'm so excited about this group that I'm working with that it's hard for me to sleep at night," McCarthy said. "I like them because they want to be the best, they want to be together, they compete against each other and they push each other. They listen to what you tell them because they believe in what you're saying. It's just a pleasure to work with these kids."


<a href='http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/news?slug=uwire-centralfloridawidereceiver&prov=uwire&type=lgns' target='_blank'>http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/news?slug=uw...uwire&type=lgns</a>
Our receiving core is loaded this year. Hopefully we can get them the ball.

Thanks for the article.

Guest

Joe Gilbert is one of the best offensive line coaches in the business, but he'll have to be a miracle worker if he's going to get the "superior Florida talent" that he inherited to protect your QB enough to allow those WRs to shine. Best of luck, but I still believe you're a couple years away from being a good team.
We will be a much better team this year, I don't know if we will be good simply due to depth issues. Our first team is as good as anyone's in the MAC and our receiving corp will go 7 or 8 deep. However, we won't be throwing anywhere near the number of time we did under Kruz. A lot more of Alex Haynes at RB, Option and quick strikes. You are right about timing, except we will be hyper competitive in 2005. We will have the only indoor practice facility in the state (late 2004), recruiting has already picked up big time and money is coming faster than anyone predicted including our season tickets sales getting ready to double this year! Look for a MAC attendance record for a game against WV (40,000-50,000).

Guest

bignow Wrote:Our first team is as good as anyone's in the MAC
Not really. Break it down realistically. Toledo, BG and Miami all have a better WR corp. Toledo, Akron, NIU and Kent have far superior, experienced QBs. Compare your offensive line to Toledo, BG, Marshall, NIU, or Miami and you'll fall far short. Your defense can't hold a candle to Miami, Marshall or BG. Haynes may be the equal of many MAC RBs, but he's certainly not on the same level as guys like Pope and Dawson, and if even if he were, your O line won't allow him to show it.
Haynes is within the top 2 backs in this conference. He hasn't had chances to prove that under a pass happy offense. And with our line facing depth issues, he may not get the chance to prove it again. But I think Gilbert is gonna have this line doing pretty well. Our team is in much better shape than they have been in years past due to increased spending from the athletic department. We sent 73 players to summer school so we could keep them in the conditioning program. It's paying off. And hopefully Gilbert will get those lineman in top form. Can't ask for more than that. Our center Gagne Marcoux is still solid and that guy is gonna be a beast by his senior year. There are questions at the two deep though. But don't think that your baby backs are so superior. They have had a great line to run behind. Didn't you guys have an OT go 1st round last year?
Looking at the media guides and recalling the games I have watched last year on my satellite dish, I would rank UCF's receivers in the middle of the MAC this year. Teams like WMU, Ball State and NIU have rock sold receiving units that few people speak of when looking at UT, BG, Miami and Marshall's WR units. Ohio has the league's fastest player in Mayle (reportedly ran a 4.22/40). Overall the MAC is stacked at receiver and I am expecting a lot of high scoring games this year, both in conference and when MAC teams play OOC games.

Not picking on UCF but I certainly think they are at least two years away from having a winning season. Their schedule is stacked this year and there have been far too many player/personel changes to be successful this year. In the long haul though, O'Leary will get it done, but they will be in C-USA by then.
I wouldn't be suprised if we stun some people this year.

I also wouldn't be suprised if we win 5 games this year.

I don't know what to expect.

Guest

knight_01 Wrote:But don't think that your baby backs are so superior.
Oh, but I do think that. Haynes hasn't shown anything special yet. He's been a good, solid runner so far, and nothing more.
Oddball Wrote:
knight_01 Wrote:But don't think that your baby backs are so superior.
Oh, but I do think that. Haynes hasn't shown anything special yet. He's been a good, solid runner so far, and nothing more.
All we can hope for is the chance to show that on the field.
Van, thanks for the feedback. I freely admit I am a homer, but when Mike Walker- WR (recruited by UF, FSU etc.) gets moved to DB (2 way player) because the WR position is loaded, that tells me a lot. Our WR corp. won't put the numbers up our receivers did in the past simply becaused of the new emphasis on the run and multiple options (Option QB,RB, TE and 6 good receivers) rather than a pure go-to guy. Because of those changes, I also believe there is a distinct possibility Haynes puts up some great number running and receiving.
We will see if Gilbert's and George Godsey's coaching can make an immeadiate impact on our O-line and QB play. 5-6 is about what's expected, anything over that is gravy!! I do expect a winning record in 2005.<a href='http://ucfathletics.com/article.asp?articleid=59021' target='_blank'>UCF practice report/ WR</a>
Oddball Wrote:Best of luck, but I still believe you're a couple years away from being a good team.
A couple of points from beating Toledo 2 years ago...what does that say about your team?

No one know what to expect from UCF this year. It is kind of nerve racking for Golden Knight Fans. You can see it in all the media previews. Everyone ranks them in the middle of the pack, but note that UCF could be the big surprise of the season.

In the mean time I will 04-drinky to get rid of my nerves.
BlackNGold Wrote:
Oddball Wrote:Best of luck, but I still believe you're a couple years away from being a good team.
A couple of points from beating Toledo 2 years ago...what does that say about your team?

No one know what to expect from UCF this year. It is kind of nerve racking for Golden Knight Fans. You can see it in all the media previews. Everyone ranks them in the middle of the pack, but note that UCF could be the big surprise of the season.

In the mean time I will 04-drinky to get rid of my nerves.
Actually, Toledo beat UCF in 2002. The game was played in Orlando and Toledo won 27-24. Try to get your facts straight next time!
Vandelay Wrote:Not picking on UCF but I certainly think they are at least two years away from having a winning season. Their schedule is stacked this year and there have been far too many player/personel changes to be successful this year. In the long haul though, O'Leary will get it done, but they will be in C-USA by then.
Correct.

One can't change a passing offense (now even without an experience QB for the first time in 6 years) into a running game overnight..with only 1 experience RB. What if Haynes gets hurt?? Wilcox is next...but didn't get that much work last year.

UCF has already lost an OL due to injuries this week...so that didn't help.

As O'Leary has mentioned many times...UCF is weak in experience on both OL and DL/LB.

That's why O'Leary recruited 13 Linemen from his 1st class (signed 14..but one decided not to play football a week before practice).

Give O'Leary 2 more recruiting classes...wait till his players are Redshirt Juniors that HE recruited...and UCF will be a very solid team.

UCF hired O'Leary for the LONG HAUL...and not for the quick fix.

That is money wisely spent.

KL

Guest

BlackNGold Wrote:
Oddball Wrote:Best of luck, but I still believe you're a couple years away from being a good team.
A couple of points from beating Toledo 2 years ago...what does that say about your team?
I'm sorry, but I am unable to comment upon some alternative universe that I have never visited. Good luck calming those nerves, though. 04-cheers

Guest

KnightLight Wrote:
Vandelay Wrote:Not picking on UCF but I certainly think they are at least two years away from having a winning season.&nbsp; Their schedule is stacked this year and there have been far too many player/personel changes to be successful this year.&nbsp; In the long haul though, O'Leary will get it done, but they will be in C-USA by then.
Correct.

One can't change a passing offense (now even without an experience QB for the first time in 6 years) into a running game overnight..with only 1 experience RB. What if Haynes gets hurt?? Wilcox is next...but didn't get that much work last year.

UCF has already lost an OL due to injuries this week...so that didn't help.

As O'Leary has mentioned many times...UCF is weak in experience on both OL and DL/LB.

That's why O'Leary recruited 13 Linemen from his 1st class (signed 14..but one decided not to play football a week before practice).

Give O'Leary 2 more recruiting classes...wait till his players are Redshirt Juniors that HE recruited...and UCF will be a very solid team.

UCF hired O'Leary for the LONG HAUL...and not for the quick fix.

That is money wisely spent.

KL
Excellent points, KL. UCF will dominate C-USA in a few years if O'Leary sticks around. Hiring Gilbert and recruiting linemen shows what sort of plan he has, and it looks like a good one.
Reference URL's