Here's my slant on it all
I'm suprised Cinncy hawk hasn't replied to this one. Time to open a can of vasaline, lube up, and slide into a nappy bowl slot.
KC
Kit-Cat Wrote:I'm suprised Cinncy hawk hasn't replied to this one. Time to open a can of vasaline, lube up, and slide into a nappy bowl slot.
KC
Way too much visual there, KC. But pretty damned funny
Ford Field is sexy, eh? Cinncy Hawk can grind that upper deck. Its indoors, so very wet.
KC
not sure if people have seen this yet..
<a href='http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/college/2002/bowl_projections/' target='_blank'>CNN SI Bowl Projections</a>
No wonder their tv network went belly up.
Would somebody tell them that BG and USF already play and the bowl sponsors, the schools, the fans, the tv network, anyone with any sense will NOT be wanting a rematch.
Hey KC.....am I the "Cincy Hawk" you refer to......just wondering. BTW, I've been kind of busy (work related) the last few days so I haven't had any time to post. :D
exCincy Kid Wrote:Hey KC.....am I the "Cincy Hawk" you refer to......just wondering. BTW, I've been kind of busy (work related) the last few days so I haven't had any time to post. :D
You do bowls like no other brother
KC
In that case I'll give you a prediction.........I now see 3 MAC teams bowling in one of two ways:
1) the B10 comes up short for the MCB and USF goes to Detroit (ugh) and a 3rd MAC team does go bowling somewhere else; or
2) the B10 does cover its MCB slot (with Purdue most likely), but BG beats USF and thus a 3rd MAC team gets the "nod" over USF if an at large slot comes up.
Yeah, I'm beginning to think the most likely scenario is 3 MAC teams bowling, but it still could easily be only 2 (and I just don't see it being 4 I guess).....too many dominoes "have to fall" just right for that to happen. :rolleyes: