10-25-2003, 06:18 PM
10-25-2003, 06:22 PM
Then you better get a oxygen tank for the rest of the season :)
10-25-2003, 07:54 PM
What team will show up next week? Where was this team today the entire season? 200 yards rushing? 31 points??? WOA. AND....only 13 points allowed on defense. Makes you wonder what the hell happened at Ohio, Kent St, and Akron. But anyways, it was a very solid day for UCF football. It's about time.
10-26-2003, 02:50 PM
31-13 and if Schneider had ANY clue that he has more receivers than just Capers it would have been a bigger rout.
Cape needs to get hurt so Ryan figures out who else to throw to.
Pi***ng me off, he has alot of guys out there that have great hands and are over 5 foot tall and he has to throw too the only guy that is shorter than the kicker.
Capers is good but he is double covered alllllllll the time 'cause all defenses know that he is the first option for Ryan.
Cape needs to get hurt so Ryan figures out who else to throw to.
Pi***ng me off, he has alot of guys out there that have great hands and are over 5 foot tall and he has to throw too the only guy that is shorter than the kicker.
Capers is good but he is double covered alllllllll the time 'cause all defenses know that he is the first option for Ryan.
10-26-2003, 05:17 PM
The Knight Time Wrote:What team will show up next week? Where was this team today the entire season? 200 yards rushing? 31 points??? WOA. AND....only 13 points allowed on defense. Makes you wonder what the hell happened at Ohio, Kent St, and Akron. But anyways, it was a very solid day for UCF football. It's about time.No disrespect to UCF or their win, but the three Michigan MAC teams are basically Div 1-AA quality this season. If a slumping team is to "break out" against anyone, it would be against W/C/E Mi.
10-26-2003, 07:46 PM
Bronco you're missing the overall picture. For a couple weeks in a row, our offense was non existent. Our defense was being put in holes deep in their own territory over and over, due to turnovers. CMU isn't great but UCF played a complete excellent game. We ran, passed, and played good D. No direspect at all to Ohio or Kent St, but they aren't that much better than CMU. Ohio lost to Buffalo! Its way too late now, but I'd like to see those games replayed with Schneider 100% and our tailbacks healthy once again, oh yea...and our defense wasn't banged up coming into the game (too bad).
10-26-2003, 09:15 PM
The Knight Time Wrote:Bronco you're missing the overall picture. For a couple weeks in a row, our offense was non existent. Our defense was being put in holes deep in their own territory over and over, due to turnovers. CMU isn't great but UCF played a complete excellent game. We ran, passed, and played good D. No direspect at all to Ohio or Kent St, but they aren't that much better than CMU. Ohio lost to Buffalo! Its way too late now, but I'd like to see those games replayed with Schneider 100% and our tailbacks healthy once again, oh yea...and our defense wasn't banged up coming into the game (too bad).I know it sounds easy to say this considering we played them too close, but Buffalo actually looks pretty good. I know you guys saw it. We didn't believe you. They actually have the desire to win it seems, just not all the tools. IF those guys get the talent to match the heart (I think they have good coaching) they will finally be that force to reckon with that we all have been waiting for. Hopefully they break out next year and whoop some butt. Who would be cruel enough not to be happy to see them rise up and win a bunch? Except against our respective teams of course.:)
They supposedly had good recruiting classes last year and year before. Maybe these are the guys we are seeing playing as freshmen and sophomores. If so, as juniors and seniors...lookout.
10-26-2003, 09:39 PM
MUther Wrote:Buffalo was okay but we were able to shut them down in the second half. But we did the same thing to CMU. We'll see what UCF team shows up for the rest of the season.The Knight Time Wrote:Bronco you're missing the overall picture. For a couple weeks in a row, our offense was non existent. Our defense was being put in holes deep in their own territory over and over, due to turnovers. CMU isn't great but UCF played a complete excellent game. We ran, passed, and played good D. No direspect at all to Ohio or Kent St, but they aren't that much better than CMU. Ohio lost to Buffalo! Its way too late now, but I'd like to see those games replayed with Schneider 100% and our tailbacks healthy once again, oh yea...and our defense wasn't banged up coming into the game (too bad).I know it sounds easy to say this considering we played them too close, but Buffalo actually looks pretty good. I know you guys saw it. We didn't believe you. They actually have the desire to win it seems, just not all the tools. IF those guys get the talent to match the heart (I think they have good coaching) they will finally be that force to reckon with that we all have been waiting for. Hopefully they break out next year and whoop some butt. Who would be cruel enough not to be happy to see them rise up and win a bunch? Except against our respective teams of course.:)
They supposedly had good recruiting classes last year and year before. Maybe these are the guys we are seeing playing as freshmen and sophomores. If so, as juniors and seniors...lookout.
10-26-2003, 10:31 PM
The Buffalo game wasn't as close as 9 points indicated. If we had any offense whatsoever we would have put up alot more. Rivera just sucks that bad. Schneider would have put atleast 35 on them. But, I do agree Buffalo is getting better. They just need to keep the trend going, and not fall off next year. This week's win is a start...
10-26-2003, 10:34 PM
[quote="MUther"] [quote="The Knight Time"] Bronco you're missing the overall picture.