<a href='http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=11010' target='_blank'>Front Page Magazine article</a>
Campus Rally for Terror
By Lee Kaplan
FrontPageMagazine.com | November 26, 2003
THE "Skill Share Discussion Workshop" was entitled "Deconstructing Zionist Responses On Your Campus." The topic? How to dismiss concern over suicide bombings while debating the Israel/Palestine issue. "Refuse to discuss it", said one student.
You know, if BG had only beaten Ohio State, you wouldn't have to dig through leftist online periodicals for board fodder.
How bad would it have been for OSU if BG had actually beat them? WVU is so scared of the ramifications statewide of a loss to Marshall that they recently refused a 2-0 offer with both games at their place. It would seem like a school like OSU would never live down a loss to one of the other Ohio schools. I just wonder what would have happened if they had lost that one.
And I'm supposed to take seriously the rantings of a magazine headed by someone who thinks Rush Limbaugh is just a little too liberal?
In all seriousness, if OSU had lost to BG, it wouldn't have been the end of the world in Columbus. I know nobody on this board wants to believe it, let alone hear it, but knowledgeable OSU fans (I know that's not all of them) have a huge amount of respect for the MAC, particularly Ohio MAC schools. BG proved they were capable of beating OSU. Miami gave them a scare a few year's back. Akron hung around all game 3 years ago, as did OU shorrtly before that.
I believe the shock value of a loss to a MAC team (and it will happen sooner than later) is gone.
Many Buckeye fans acutally know a thing or two about college football.
I link. You decide.
<a href='http://www.daytondailynews.com/localnews/content/localnews/daily/1106arab.html' target='_blank'>http://www.daytondailynews.com/localnews/c...y/1106arab.html</a>
<a href='http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20031108/NEWS09/111080159' target='_blank'>http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a...EWS09/111080159</a>
<a href='http://www.daytondailynews.com/localnews/content/localnews/daily/1109arab.html' target='_blank'>http://www.daytondailynews.com/localnews/c...y/1109arab.html</a>
<a href='http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/1068287750304190.xml' target='_blank'>http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/...87750304190.xml</a>
Bill of Rights. Amendment I
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. "
I double checked, but unfortunately, there isn't anything in this amendment stating, "except for insane morons."
Rightupinthere Wrote:Bill of Rights. Amendment I
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. "
I double checked, but unfortunately, there isn't anything in this amendment stating, "except for insane morons."
Who brought congress into this?
DrTorch Wrote:Rightupinthere Wrote:Bill of Rights. Amendment I
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. "
I double checked, but unfortunately, there isn't anything in this amendment stating, "except for insane morons."
Who brought congress into this?
That dude from Tulane.
Wait...this isn't the BCS argument again?
