CSNbbs

Full Version: Insults and Lousy Analysis
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
(Insert evil madman laugh here).

Well boys and girls, the newest version of the MAC is underway and it's going the way of Apple's MAC - relegated to a fringe audience who screams about how it's so much better than everything else even if it does only have a 0.0000001% market share. Anywho, MAC teams are making it way, way too easy to insult them this year so let's stick to just lousy analysis. Nah. We'll toss in a few insults just the same.

In the East:

1. Maimi (OH) - This is a school that has just discovered that, shock of shocks, a QB who was a first round NFL draft pick actually does contribute just a smidgen to the offense. Oh yeah. So do those 3 senior offensive linemen. After the expected romp over Indiana State, the Redskin fans actually expected their team to make a game of it at Michigan rather than taking their pounding and the paycheck. Oopsie. Of course, we know they'll be fired up for Cincy. Right? Won't they? NO THEY WON'T!!! A 45-26 drubbing served up by the Bearcats exposed a Swiss Cheese defense (something that is apparently endemic in the MAC this year). I was laughed at by Miami (OH) fans when I said that 2003 was a dream season and it wouldn't be repeated anytime soon. BWAHAHAHAHAHA.

2. Akron was the third team, along with Miami (OH) and the Herd who was supposed to contend for the MAC East this year. Well, we now know that Middle Tennessee State will be chasing the Redskins and Marshall for the title.

3. Mentioning the Herd. Marshall put up one of the worst offensive line performances in the history of college football only to follow it up with an impressive showing against THE Ohio State University. And, much to everyone's surprise except the Herd faithful, Marshall's run defense looks stout this year although the secondary is having some problems. Will Marshall have any serious competition for the East title. It depends. Does the Troy team show up or does the OSU team show up?

4. Ohio (U) may be the surprise of the East and may be the only team to actually contend with the Herd. Despite what Bobkittie fans and Dr. Torch may think, the option is NOT the offense of the future. Ohio (U) has finally joined the 20th century and decided to take advantage of a rule that - gasp - actually allows one person to throw the ball in the air to another person. Many of their fans are still scratching their armpits (well, the Athens girls who haven't shaved their armpits anyway) wondering what to make of this new development but they may like the results on the field even if they remain puzzled by said forward pass.

5. Buffalo. New year. Same team. Not much defense and a weak offense. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

6. CFU fans are discovering another truth of college football. Forking out close to $1 mil per year to a coach is not a guarantee of a winning season. After last year's core meltdown, O'Leary has a monster rebuilding project on his hands. He might make it happen but don't look for the Kaniggits to make any serious waves this year (Floridians like to rely on all the damned Hurricanes for that) (See what you get for putting Dubya in office?) 03-razz

7. Well, Kent's gotten tromped by Iowa and they sort of tromped Liberty. Bear in mind that if Kent had something more than a one man offense, they should have put up 50 on Liberty without even breaking a sweat. Instead, they only put up 38. Flush fans have one more season to enjoy watching the best athlete in the MAC. Next year, they will contend with Buffalo for the cellar in the East and they may make a run at ESPN's bottom 10.

In the West:

1. Toledump. Well, I could insult the Rockettes but their defense has been insulting enough. Although they certainly haven't experienced the off-field problems that CFU did last season, their meltdown is very reminiscent of that year. Amstutz the Hut has proven that he is a good coach but can he rally the team to actually start performing on the field? They get two patsies in EMU and Temple so they should end up 2-2 but, if either of those games is the least bit close, the Rockettes may have a season of discontent.

2. BUGS. This is the only team in the MAC that's been consistent so far. They gave the Sooners a decent game and gave the expected pounding to SEMO. But, what the hell is up with the MAC this year putting the big matchups at the beginning of the season? If someone can explain to me the logic of that decision, I'll kiss your ****** and do it in public. BUGS gets the Huskies on Sep 23 and that game could decide the West just like the Marshall/Miami (OH) game could decide the East. Hint to MAC officials. You need to draw the crowds in November. To draw those crowds, you need to give people a reason to show up. Deciding the title in September is the opposite.

3. EMU fans are talking smack. It's the 6th sign of the apocolypse. Why they are talking smack I have no idea. They eked out a close win over one of the worst teams in all of college football. Apparently, they take hope from the fact that they kept an overrated Florida team close for about a 1 1/2 quarters. Won't matter. Toledump Tom will soon put the lie to EMU delusions that they actually have a decent team this year.

4. WMU fans are just crying. What the hell has happened to that program? Ever since Darnell said he was leaving, then said he was staying, then said he was leaving, then stayed, they've gone downhill. OK. "Should I Stay or Should I Go" is a good song but it's a lousy philosophy for a head coach to communicate.

5. CMU was picked by many, including yours truly to be the surprise team in the West. Well, they've been a surprise all right. To be frank, they have been a surprise but the surprise has been how badly they've played. They got blown out by Indiana (hey, it ain't basketball season) and then got beat by Michigan State. Well now you say. That's Michigan State. Sure, but the Spartans lost to Rutgers. Say it again. Rutgers. Assuming a communicative property to college football, that means CMU is worse than Rutgers. That's bad folks.

6. NIU has been on their stereotypical roller coaster. After giving Maryland all they wanted, they gave Southern Illinois all they wanted. Still, we can probably assume that NIU was down after the close loss to the turtles so I don't put a whole lot of stock in the SIU game. The question for NIU is - how will they figure out a way to lose the West again this year?

7. Ball State is playing going for the schizophrenia award. Played Boston College to within 6 and then got obliterated and humiliated and domesticated by Purdue. In all fairness, Purdue may be the most underranked team in the country right now. They are looking very, very good. So, the verdict is still out on Testicle Tech. The won't win the West but they might just play the spoiler.

_____________________________

That's all for now boys and girls. Tune in next week when Bullwinkle asks, "hey Rocky, will the Rockettes set an NCAA record for points allowed?"
MAKO, not sure you ever responded to the comments that came back to you from Miami fans in your other recent thread giving RedHawk followers grief. Don't know where you came up with the concept that Miami fans felt we'd be just as good without Big Ben and OL like Jacob Bell (to the NFL). Running the ball was a real question mark coming into this season, and obviously has been a weak spot for us.

As for QB, although Betts played lousy against Michigan, he had a very good performance against Cincy............but our defense, expected by many (including moi) to be the mainstay of our team this year, didn't show up. We had 8 starters from our D back, and as the ABC announcers mentioned frequently during the Michigan game, we have great speed in our defense. Are we that bad all of a sudden with the same personnel? Is it due to coaching changes ??(e.g. D coordinator Narduzzi leaving for UC?). Perhaps....I think we'll know more after the OU game.

Miami was picked for 2nd in most preseason publications (not written by Miami alums to my knowledge) and had 17 starters returning. So, I don't think Miamians were "off the deep end" thinking that we'd still compete strongly for the MAC East title this year..........and I see no reason to "throw in the towel" until we see what happens this week and in H-ton on the 29th.
MAKO Wrote:6. CFU fans are discovering another truth of college football. Forking out close to $1 mil per year to a coach is not a guarantee of a winning season. After last year's core meltdown, O'Leary has a monster rebuilding project on his hands. He might make it happen but don't look for the Kaniggits to make any serious waves this year (Floridians like to rely on all the damned Hurricanes for that) (See what you get for putting Dubya in office?) 03-razz
We didn't pay for this season. This is a rebuilding year.

I'm pretty sure nobody expected to take Wiscy and WVU to the house after last season' debacle.
The Knight Time Wrote:
MAKO Wrote:6.  CFU fans are discovering another truth of college football.  Forking out close to $1 mil per year to a coach is not a guarantee of a winning season.  After last year's core meltdown, O'Leary has a monster rebuilding project on his hands.  He might make it happen but don't look for the Kaniggits to make any serious waves this year (Floridians like to rely on all the damned Hurricanes for that) (See what you get for putting Dubya in office?)  03-razz
We didn't pay for this season. This is a rebuilding year.

I'm pretty sure nobody expected to take Wiscy and WVU to the house after last season' debacle.
ex Cincy Kid,

I really thought that the RedHawks defense was slow. The one linebacker (I don't recall his name) did catch Hall on a long run in the second half, but that's about the only speed I saw on defense. The UC receivers were open most of the night, and Hannibal Thomas consistently got behind the Miami secondary. This game may not be representative of Miami's defense, but I thought it was undersized and slow. It looks like Miami(Oh) is going to have to outscore the other team to win this year.
The defense is far from slow. We have two linebackers that run in the 4.4 range, and our two corners run 4.2-4.3. Our ends are undersized, and D'Antonio et. al were smart enough to take advantage of that. Plus, UC has a big, veteran, O-line.

MAKO, you might want to check out who the offensive player of the week in the MAC was.

<a href='http://mac-sports.collegesports.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/091304aah.html' target='_blank'>POTW</a>

Quote:Offense - Josh Betts, Miami, quarterback
(Jr., Vandalia, Ohio)
Betts completed 26-of-43 pass attempts for 416 yards and four touchdowns in a 45-26 loss at Cincinnati. Betts also led the team in rushing with 32 yards on seven carries to boost his total offense to 448 yards. His passing yards were the fourth highest in school history and his total offense third highest in program history.

Not really much of a "step down" now, is it?

The problem is our defensive line and our run blocking.
MAKO Wrote:They get two patsies in EMU and Temple so they should end up 2-2 but, if either of those games is the least bit close, the Rockettes may have a season of discontent.
Even if we win the rest of our games and win the MACC and MCB there will still be disappointment in Rocketland because we couldn't get it done against the big boys while the nation was watching.
MAKO Wrote:The question for NIU is - how will they figure out a way to lose the West again this year?
If we don't win the West, we'll just blame it on getting our starting QB hurt, just like Marshall did in 2003. :wave:
I'm glad your back, Mako. Doug Martin is actually quoting your smack from the chain I sent him in the spring. Apparently, your words are motivational. Just remember, if the Herd gets a little surprise on October 16, that you did your part.
Glad I could be of service FlashFan. :D
HuskieDan Wrote:
MAKO Wrote:The question for NIU is - how will they figure out a way to lose the West again this year?
If we don't win the West, we'll just blame it on getting our starting QB hurt, just like Marshall did in 2003. :wave:
You have to be running out of excuses by now...huh? :wave:
Quote:5. CMU was picked by many, including yours truly to be the surprise team in the West. Well, they've been a surprise all right. To be frank, they have been a surprise but the surprise has been how badly they've played. They got blown out by Indiana (hey, it ain't basketball season) and then got beat by Michigan State. Well now you say. That's Michigan State. Sure, but the Spartans lost to Rutgers. Say it again. Rutgers. Assuming a communicative property to college football, that means CMU is worse than Rutgers. That's bad folks.


While acknowledging that this is "insults and lousy analysis," a few comments:

Look beyond the score of CMU-IU. CMU actually outgained the Hoosiers in total yardage 389-334 and had more first downs. That's right: IU had just over 330 yards and managed 41 points! How? Great field position was a factor (mostly poor punting and kick coverage by CMU), as was a 94 yd interception return for a score that was devastating. 03-banghead If CMU scores there, it's either 17-10 or 17-6 and still a game :( BTW, the Hoosiers used the same formula (defense and great special teams) to win in Eugene on Saturday. Oregon had something like 250 more yards of total offense but was undone by a slew of turnovers and an IU kickoff return for a TD.


CMU/MSU: 24-7 ain't bad, and it should have been closer. CMU missed a 1st-and-goal inside the MSU five by inches when Kent Smith came oh-so-close to connecting with a receiver near the sidelines. We were also homered by Big Ten refs on at least four occasions (bogus PI call, mystery punt interference call, and two blatant non-calls against MSU, one where refs actually picked up the flag and waived off a clip against MSU). A CMU DB also let a "sure" interception -- that was 90% likely to be returned for a TD-- go through his hands to a waiting Spartan receiver. Central forced five straight punts by MSU between the first and fourth quarters, with MSU nursing a 10 point lead. Don't get me wrong, the team with the better passing game won, but CMU was very competitive in that game. We just didn't take advantage of enough breaks that came our way (open receivers, also). 04-drinky


As for UNH beating Rutgers, I'd chalk that up in part to Rutgers being unused to success and looking past the I-AA school. It was an any-given-Saturday moment , but that's all. I think Rutgers would beat UNH nine times out of ten.
I always look forward to Mako's Insults and Lousy Analysis. First, they're funny. Second, they're often insightful. Third, they're occassionally dead on the money. Fourth, lots of people take 'em too damn seriously.
Just so long as he doesn't morph into a "Green Steve" (probably the most obnoxious poster I've ever read - guess which board he's on - hint: not EMU).

Most posters on this board are really good to keeping to facts and measured opinions. On that Herd board some "just don't get it."

I assume the moderators here wouldn't let half the bashing (verbal thugery) on that board go here.
Herd Fan 4-Life Wrote:
HuskieDan Wrote:
MAKO Wrote:The question for NIU is - how will they figure out a way to lose the West again this year?
If we don't win the West, we'll just blame it on getting our starting QB hurt, just like Marshall did in 2003. :wave:
You have to be running out of excuses by now...huh? :wave:
We can always use the old Herd favorite - "our backup QB blows goats, despitethefactthatwewerepumpinghimupbeforetheseasonasthesecondcoming." That NEVER goes out of style. :wave:


:D
CMichFan Wrote:While acknowledging that this is "insults and lousy analysis," a few comments:

Look beyond the score of CMU-IU. CMU actually outgained the Hoosiers in total yardage 389-334 and had more first downs. That's right: IU had just over 330 yards and managed 41 points! How? Great field position was a factor (mostly poor punting and kick coverage by CMU), as was a 94 yd interception return for a score that was devastating. 03-banghead If CMU scores there, it's either 17-10 or 17-6 and still a game :( BTW, the Hoosiers used the same formula (defense and great special teams) to win in Eugene on Saturday. Oregon had something like 250 more yards of total offense but was undone by a slew of turnovers and an IU kickoff return for a TD.
For the record, that potential CMU TD at IU would have made it 20-10. Bottom line to me was that your QBs just didn't look very good.

As for IU @ Oregon, they held a 7-3 turnover margin. Two in their favor were punt return fumbles where the ball hit the returner either in the face mask or the shoulder. He didn't just miss 'em, he missed 'em badly. The others were all caused due to hits or pressure.
HuskieDan Wrote:
Herd Fan 4-Life Wrote:
HuskieDan Wrote:
MAKO Wrote:The question for NIU is - how will they figure out a way to lose the West again this year?
If we don't win the West, we'll just blame it on getting our starting QB hurt, just like Marshall did in 2003. :wave:
You have to be running out of excuses by now...huh? :wave:
We can always use the old Herd favorite - "our backup QB blows goats, despitethefactthatwewerepumpinghimupbeforetheseasonasthesecondcoming." That NEVER goes out of style. :wave:


:D
Or the ever popular...."wehadthedamnseasoninthebaguntilthat1-AApowerhousespankedus" :wave:
Herd Fan 4-Life Wrote:
HuskieDan Wrote:
Herd Fan 4-Life Wrote:
HuskieDan Wrote:
MAKO Wrote:The question for NIU is - how will they figure out a way to lose the West again this year?
If we don't win the West, we'll just blame it on getting our starting QB hurt, just like Marshall did in 2003. :wave:
You have to be running out of excuses by now...huh? :wave:
We can always use the old Herd favorite - "our backup QB blows goats, despitethefactthatwewerepumpinghimupbeforetheseasonasthesecondcoming." That NEVER goes out of style. :wave:


:D
Or the ever popular...."wehadthedamnseasoninthebaguntilthat1-AApowerhousespankedus" :wave:
1-2 is in the bag? Losing by 3 is spanked?

Man, Ohio State sure smacked the Herd's ****** this weekend. Oh, the carnage. 03-razz
Karl Wrote:I always look forward to Mako's Insults and Lousy Analysis.  First, they're funny.  Second, they're often insightful.  Third, they're occassionally dead on the money.  Fourth, lots of people take 'em too damn seriously.
I agree....great stuff MAKO! :rofl:

BG plays at NIU on 9/24. I thought the same thing when the sked was announced...Why is this game so freakin early in the year? E S P N....
I agree that MAKO is a smart and witty guy, but I'd get even more of a chuckle outta his commentary if I didn't know (from perusing other boards from time-to-time) that in reality he seems to genuinely despise the MAC, my school and our fans. Am I right on that, MAKO?

P.S. Speaking of witty, where the heck is Overherd these days??
MAKO's got the skillz! He plays a little fast and loose with the facts (Ball State lost by 8 to BC), but that's to be expected from a man of the legal profession. My fear is that after this year his formidable wit will be lost on the mental giants of a certain other conference. :)
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's