For those interested, my latest MAC column is now posted here at <a href='http://againsttheline.com/artman/publish/article_386.shtml' target='_blank'>Against The Line</a>
As always, my MAC column for CFN will appear on Friday.
IF CMU can successfully rectify the bad attendance numbers from Saturday -- we apparently paid some independent firm to f@#$ us over! :mad: -- I will consider us to have beaten the infamous Bye. :chair:
Dave, I'll be rooting for EMU to get that non-conference win versus Idaho. :saber:
Actually, I think that defense gives this one to the Flashes. The Kent D has shown that they can, on occasion, stop someone from scoring this year. I haven't seen that ability in the Akron D yet.
Go Flashes!
Zips
"Home field advantage gives this one to the Flashes."
Actually, the road team has won three of the last four in this series. Didn't look any further.
2000 was lopsided 34-6 Akron (At Kent)
2001 was a close one, 14-10 Akron (At Akron)
2002 was lopsided, 48-10 Akron (At Kent)
2003 was close, 41-38 Kent State (At Akron)
2004 (At Kent)
Also,
"Vs. Conf USA: 0-1 (45-26)"
Now just who got <span style='color:red'><span style='font-size:7pt;line-height:100%'>BLOWN OUT</span></span> by an inferior C-USA team??
:eek: :eek:
Herd Fan 4-Life Wrote:"Home field advantage gives this one to the Flashes."
Actually, the road team has won three of the last four in this series. Didn't look any further.
2000 was lopsided 34-6 Akron (At Kent)
2001 was a close one, 14-10 Akron (At Akron)
2002 was lopsided, 48-10 Akron (At Kent)
2003 was close, 41-38 Kent State (At Akron)
2004 (At Kent)
Also,
"Vs. Conf USA: 0-1 (45-26)"
Now just who got <span style='color:red'><span style='font-size:7pt;line-height:100%'>BLOWN OUT</span></span> by an inferior C-USA team??
:eek: :eek:
Hey, I refuse to let facts get in the way of my opinion!
Actually, good information there HF4L. We'll see if Kent breaks the trend this year I guess.
Well, another close one HD....but Akron gets the W.