CSNbbs

through week 5 results

2004 line-ups:
C-USA (6-11 vs BCS, 3-1 vs Non-BCS, 3-0 vs I-AA)
MWC (5-12 vs BCS, 3-2 vs Non-BCS, 4-0 vs I-AA)
MAC (1-25 vs BCS, 0-4 vs Non-BCS, 7-1 vs I-AA)
WAC (3-9 vs BCS, 5-3 vs Non-BCS, 5-1 vs I-AA)
SunBelt (1-14 vs BCS, 3-5 vs Non-BCS, 3-0 vs I-AA)

2005 Line-ups:
C-USA
-- lose 3 teams to BigEast (L'ville, Cinci, USF) that are (2-3, 1-0) combined
-- lose TCU to MWC who is (1-1, 1-0)
-- lose Army to independents who is (0-1, 0-0)
= net records of teams leaving (3-5, 2-0)
= remaining teams are a combined (3-6, 1-1)
-- add 2 teams from MAC that are a combined (0-5, 0-1)
-- add 4 teams from WAC that are a combined (0-6, 1-2)
= NET 2005 Line-up = (3-17 vs BCS, 2-4 vs Non-BCS)

MWC
-- add TCU who is (1-1, 1-0)
= NET 2005 Line-up = (6-13 vs BCS, 4-2 vs Non-BCS)

MAC
- lose 2 teams that are (0-5, 0-1) combined
= NET 2005 Line-up = (1-20 vs BCS, 0-3 vs Non-BCS)

WAC
-- lose 4 teams to C-USA that are a combined (0-6, 1-2)
= Remaining teams are a combined (3-3, 4-1)
-- adding 3 teams that are (0-5, 1-3) combined
= NET 2005 Line-Up = (3-8 vs BCS, 5-4 vs Non-BCS)

SunBelt
-- lose 3 teams that are a combined (0-5, 1-3)
= Net 2005 Line-up of current I-A teams (1-9 vs BCS, 2-2 vs Non-BCS)

****There is some fudging necessary since two schools that are presently I-AA will become I-A members of the SunBelt (which I didn't add - just because I didn't look them up) and 3 members of this year's C-USA will be considered BCS teams next year.

One thing I didn't notice before is how successful we are to getting games scheduled. Granted we have more teams, but we're nearly double the next highest. Respect will come again when we have another 9-20-03, but would be nice if the bottom rung of the MAC show's up.