<a href='http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041102/SPORTS04/411020363/-1/SPORTS' target='_blank'>Temple</a>
Forget Temple, unless you could use their location to lure Navy.
niu79 Wrote:Forget Temple, unless you could use their location to lure Navy.
Would temple be so bad playing a MAC schedule?
Probably not.
Temple is a bad, bad, bad idea for the MAC.
This is a terrible idea. The MAC does not need another team with a 100-something ranking in the conference.
Huskie39 Wrote:This is a terrible idea. The MAC does not need another team with a 100-something ranking in the conference.
We are losing one why not pick one up
NIUGAMBLER Wrote:Huskie39 Wrote:This is a terrible idea. The MAC does not need another team with a 100-something ranking in the conference.
We are losing one why not pick one up
Why do we want to make the conference worse????
Temple is dumb dumb dumb, all it would do is add a long trip for no money and another Bottom 10 program to the bottom feeders. the only team that would think this is a good idea is Buffalo.
Pretty good TV market! That's what it is all about!
GO HUSKIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They should only be allowed to join if they are an all sport member. If not then who needs them. At least the MAC would get a little more respect for bball. Temple wont do that though.
pantone1935 Wrote:Pretty good TV market! That's what it is all about!
GO HUSKIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nobody pays attention to their FB team in that market.
I'd only consider Temple if we were to indeed lose someone and we were to get at least their BB in some form. Otherwise, screw them. BG beat 'em like a bad Ohio team this year.
NIUGAMBLER Wrote:niu79 Wrote:Forget Temple, unless you could use their location to lure Navy.
Would temple be so bad playing a MAC schedule?
Probably not.
BGSU™ 70
Temple 16
Toledo 45
Temple 17
rocketfootball Wrote:NIUGAMBLER Wrote:niu79 Wrote:Forget Temple, unless you could use their location to lure Navy.
Would temple be so bad playing a MAC schedule?
Probably not.
BGSU™ 70
Temple 16
Toledo 45
Temple 17
I don't think the MAC is full of Toledos and BGSU's....
We have much of the bottom 17.
NIUGAMBLER Wrote:rocketfootball Wrote:NIUGAMBLER Wrote:niu79 Wrote:Forget Temple, unless you could use their location to lure Navy.
Would temple be so bad playing a MAC schedule?
Probably not.
BGSU™ 70
Temple 16
Toledo 45
Temple 17
I don't think the MAC is full of Toledos and BGSU's....
We have much of the bottom 17.
There are two sides to the MAC. The top 6 that would blow out Temple and the bottom 6 that would compete with Temple.
Temple would be a bottom 6 team in the MAC. We already have that with BSU, Ohio, Buffalo, Kent, EMU,and WMU. We don't need another bottom 6 school in the MAC.