CSNbbs

Full Version: Chryst says bowl opportunities are
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
<a href='http://www.dailymail.com/news/Sports/2004120214/' target='_blank'>http://www.dailymail.com/news/Sports/2004120214/</a>


MAC's Chryst says bowl opportunities are ‘long overdue'

By The Associated Press
Thursday December 02, 2004

DETROIT -- The MAC is trying to go big time.

For the first time, the Mid-American Conference will have its football championship decided on a neutral field tonight when Miami (Ohio) plays Toledo at Ford Field.

The MAC will have five teams in bowl games this postseason and could have as many as six, three times its previous record.

"These additional opportunities are long overdue,'' MAC Commissioner Rick Chryst said Wednesday. "It speaks to the competitiveness in our league and the respect we're finally earning.''

The defending champion RedHawks (8-3, 7-1 MAC) would've hosted the title game if the MAC didn't sign a three-year contract with Ford Field, home of the NFL's Detroit Lions, but they still think they have an edge over the Rockets (8-3, 7-1).

"We were in a championship game last year and it gives us a little advantage because a lot of guys are coming back,'' Miami quarterback Josh Betts said.

Ben Roethlisberger chose not to return to Miami for his senior season, but the decision was good for him -- and the Pittsburgh Steelers -- and it didn't ruin the RedHawks' season.

"That just shows they have a great team,'' Toledo receiver Lance Moore said. "A lot of people counted them out as soon as he declared for the NFL draft. I knew that Miami was going to be good because they had a lot of great players around Ben.''

Betts completed 62.2 percent of his passes this season for 2,951 yards with 19 touchdowns and 11 interceptions. Running back Luke Clemens averaged 102 yards rushing the last six games while running for nine TDs.

Miami, looking to repeat as MAC champions for the first time in three decades, is ranked 13th in the nation against the run and 28th in total defense.

That unit will attempt to slow down Moore, Toledo's all-time leading receiver, and quarterback Bruce Gradkowski.

Moore is No. 1 in school history with 212 receptions, 2,610 yards receiving and 22 TD receptions, including a Rocket-record 11 this season.

Gradkowski is ranked seventh in the country in passing efficiency and trails only one quarterback with a 70.5 completion percentage. He threw 23 TDs and seven interceptions this season.

The Rockets are playing for the MAC title for the fifth time in eight years and after losing three of those games at Marshall, they're thankful to play Miami in the Motor City.

"It's just neat that there's no home-field advantage for either team,'' Gradkowski.


The winner of the Miami-Toledo game will return to Ford Field to face Connecticut on Dec. 27 in the Motor City Bowl. The loser of the title game and Northern Illinois will head to either the Independence Bowl or the Silicon Valley Classic.
Bowling Green already is set to play Memphis in the GMAC bowl and Marshall has accepted an offer to play Cincinnati in the Fort Worth Bowl. Akron, a sixth bowl-eligible team, could land in a postseason game.

The MAC has sent two teams to bowls four times, including the last three years.

"In past years, there's been some outstanding teams sitting at home after the season,'' Toledo Coach Tom Amstutz said.


* * *


THE MAC has added the Independence Bowl to its postseason lineup for 2004, and an agreement has been reached with the Motor City Bowl and the Silicon Valley Football Classic concerning the team selection process for three bowl-eligible MAC programs.

The MAC is guaranteed five bowl berths for the first time, including Marshall's Fort Worth Bowl date on Dec. 23 against Cincinnati.

Following tonight's MAC title game, the Motor City Bowl will select the MAC champion -- either Toledo or Miami -- to face Connecticut in the Dec. 27 game at Ford Field here.

The Independence Bowl, through an agreement reached with the Silicon Valley Classic, has now acquired priority selection rights for the remaining MAC bowl eligible teams.

Following the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) Selection Show on Sunday, the Independence Bowl will invite either the MAC runner-up -- Toledo (8-3) or Miami (8-3) -- or Northern Illinois (8-3) to face an opponent from the Big 12 Conference on Dec. 28 in Shreveport, La.

Following the Independence Bowl selection, the Silicon Valley Football Classic will choose the MAC championship loser or NIU to play an at-large opponent Dec. 30 in San Jose, Calif.

The last MAC bowl eligible team, Akron (6-5), remains under bowl consideration, pending the results of the weekend's final regular-season games.
Quote:"These additional opportunities are long overdue,'' MAC Commissioner Rick Chryst said Wednesday. "It speaks to the competitiveness in our league and the respect we're finally earning.''

=>Uh, no Rick. Rather, it speaks to the old adage that if all the other eligible girls have dates, you have to take the ugliest girl to the prom or not go at all.
mollautt Wrote:
Quote:"These additional opportunities are long overdue,'' MAC Commissioner Rick Chryst said Wednesday. "It speaks to the competitiveness in our league and the respect we're finally earning.''

=>Uh, no Rick. Rather, it speaks to the old adage that if all the other eligible girls have dates, you have to take the ugliest girl to the prom or not go at all.
Should he have said that?
Never mind moll. He likes to look gift horses in the mouth . . . and then kick 'em in the nuts and pull their tails.

My own theory is that instant karma's gonna get you, and some of these teams are just taking delayed delivery on bowl bids they should have had years ago.
What I like is that this is test area for us. If the MAC performs well on the field and wins three, four or five games, and brings some fans to these venues, then look for the MAC to have three full time bowls going forward and possibly being aligned with more if needed. This is our chance to shine - I hope we do.

Guest

DevilGrad Wrote:Never mind moll. He likes to look gift horses in the mouth . . . and then kick 'em in the nuts and pull their tails.

My own theory is that instant karma's gonna get you, and some of these teams are just taking delayed delivery on bowl bids they should have had years ago.
Beautifully put all around! 04-bow 04-bow 04-bow
I agree with him... but u better enjoy them now... this is a one shot deal... soon as go to 12 games 6-6 teams will be eligible as long as conf has ties to the bowl... that will make 3 to 6 more bcs teams eligible.
goodknightfl Wrote:I agree with him... but u better enjoy them now... this is a one shot deal... soon as go to 12 games 6-6 teams will be eligible as long as conf has ties to the bowl... that will make 3 to 6 more bcs teams eligible.
Yes, but there are still other cities looking to certify bowl games. Some may drop off, but some other will come in their place. Let's face it -- America loves college football, and they'll watch anyone play it.

Plus, I fully expect a 3rd MAC bowl to come on board permanently. This year is for all our 10-2, 10-1, 9-2, and 8-3 teams that sat home while crappy ACC teams with 6-6 or 6-5 records (that MAC teams beat) went bowling!

04-rock
While there are other cities looking to add bowl games, don't you think that the close call this year might actually end up having a reverse effect (specifically with regards to the NCAA allowing any new bowls)? They were awfully close to not filling all of the bowl slots this year. If you were the NCAA, wouldn't you worry about having this kind of situation come up again in the future? And if you have more bowl games to fill...

I just can't imagine that they'll certify any extra bowl games after the close call this year.

That doesn't mean that the MAC won't secure a third tie in somewhere, but I just don't think it'll be a new bowl.

EdM
Don't take this as a gripe or complaint. Having this many MAC bowl games at our disposal this year is a gift that may not happen for a long time. But I can't help but notice this glut occurred in a year when most of us acknowledge that the conference went through a down/rebuilding season. Not the greatest timing. Nice to see all these bowls, but hopefully we avoid an 0-fer.
Motown Bronco Wrote:Don't take this as a gripe or complaint. Having this many MAC bowl games at our disposal this year is a gift that may not happen for a long time. But I can't help but notice this glut occurred in a year when most of us acknowledge that the conference went through a down/rebuilding season. Not the greatest timing. Nice to see all these bowls, but hopefully we avoid an 0-fer.
Yeah, that's been on my mind too.

Delayed bids they may be, but I'd rather see the 10-1, 10-2 teams be the ones to take the field.


On a related note, don't fret too much about the bowls. Fox now has the BCS, right?

Murdoch has never been one to ignore money. Fact is, a playoff would generate tons of money. I see a playoff now significantly closer.
Dodo Wrote:
goodknightfl Wrote:I agree with him... but u better enjoy them now... this is a one shot deal... soon as go to 12 games 6-6 teams will be eligible as long as conf has ties to the bowl... that will make 3 to 6 more bcs teams eligible.
Yes, but there are still other cities looking to certify bowl games. Some may drop off, but some other will come in their place. Let's face it -- America loves college football, and they'll watch anyone play it.

Plus, I fully expect a 3rd MAC bowl to come on board permanently. This year is for all our 10-2, 10-1, 9-2, and 8-3 teams that sat home while crappy ACC teams with 6-6 or 6-5 records (that MAC teams beat) went bowling!

04-rock
won't happen Dodo. the ncaa is putting a cap on the number of bowls at 28. new bowls will not be allowed to form because of the already diluted bowl system
EdM Wrote:While there are other cities looking to add bowl games, don't you think that the close call this year might actually end up having a reverse effect (specifically with regards to the NCAA allowing any new bowls)? They were awfully close to not filling all of the bowl slots this year. If you were the NCAA, wouldn't you worry about having this kind of situation come up again in the future? And if you have more bowl games to fill...

I just can't imagine that they'll certify any extra bowl games after the close call this year.

That doesn't mean that the MAC won't secure a third tie in somewhere, but I just don't think it'll be a new bowl.

EdM
you hit the nail on the head as the ncaa is going to cap the number of bowls at the current number
herd of butt whoopin beef Wrote:won't happen Dodo. the ncaa is putting a cap on the number of bowls at 28. new bowls will not be allowed to form because of the already diluted bowl system
Linky?
Schadenfreude Wrote:
herd of butt whoopin beef Wrote:won't happen Dodo.&nbsp; the ncaa is putting a cap on the number of bowls at 28.&nbsp; new bowls will not be allowed to form because of the already diluted bowl system
Linky?
<a href='http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/bowls/2004-11-30-bowl-cap_x.htm' target='_blank'>http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/foo...-bowl-cap_x.htm</a>


here ya go

Guest

DrTorch Wrote:Murdoch has never been one to ignore money.
God help us if that un-American piece of crap is supposed to be our savior.
herd of butt whoopin beef Wrote:
Schadenfreude Wrote:
herd of butt whoopin beef Wrote:won't happen Dodo.  the ncaa is putting a cap on the number of bowls at 28.  new bowls will not be allowed to form because of the already diluted bowl system
Linky?
<a href='http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/bowls/2004-11-30-bowl-cap_x.htm' target='_blank'>http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/foo...-bowl-cap_x.htm</a>


here ya go
Thanks.

I wasn't sure they'd impose a cap.

The article didn't mention 12 games seasons, which is good.
Reference URL's