CSNbbs

Full Version: MAC should stay at 12 - but still add new schools
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
The MAC should really consider contracting both Buffalo and Akron and add Southern Illinois and Middle Tennessee State.

Akron and Buffalo are football doormats, have bad facilities, and do not add much to the MAC across the board. If either program ceased to exist today there would be no real complaint from anyone except their alumni and judging from their fan support that would not be that big a deal either. More fans at Akron games wear Ohio State gear and the Buffalo fan base is more preoccupied with Syracuse, the Yankees, and the Bills. College Sports in Upstate NY is an afterthought.

The Cleveland media market would not miss Akron, as Kent State would still be here. KSU has a great overall program and would be improved with Akron being shown the door. Akron joined the MAC in 1992 and has not raised the bar, save for a occasional medicore football season. Boot em out. Replace Akron with MTSU and open up the region to a new media market in Nashville and gain southern exposure in recruiting.

Buffalo joined the league in the late 90's and despite having the highest budget in the MAC is by far the worst overall sports performer. They add no real media power to the MAC and travel no fans, just like Akron. Adding SIU would help NIU with a natual rival, would gain more of a hold in Illinois and in the Chicago media market, and would be a better solution long term.

WKU is a 1-A football wannabe and that makes them a no go in my book. We do not have time to wait on someone to ramp up their football program. Adding WKU is not a big improvement over either Akron or Buffalo. Just going to the NCAA Basketball Final Four 30 years ago does not impress me. Winning a 1-AA football title is like being the 120th best team in 1-A.

In order to really move forward the MAC should make real change, cut loose the dead weight and add in schools that make sense for the long run.
Flashy:

Interesting suggestion, though I have to say I absolutely disagree.

I'll let Akron & Buffalo fans handle the heavy lifting on this one. 03-wink
[QUOTE]WKU is a 1-A football wannabe and that makes them a no go in my book. We do not have time to wait on someone to ramp up their football program. Adding WKU is not a big improvement over either Akron or Buffalo. Just going to the NCAA Basketball Final Four 30 years ago does not impress me. Winning a 1-AA football title is like being the 120th best team in 1-A.[QUOTE]

I dare say WKU has better winning percentage against I-AA schools then MTSU does with I-AA schools.

Their is more to WKU hoops than a Final Four appearance in 1971. We rank top 10 I believe in 20 win seasons, one of 16 programs to record 1500 wins, we rank high in winning percentage, conference championships, etc etc. WKU continues to have a STRONG RPI and wins a lot of games.

Guest

Um... :eek:
Normally I don't respond, but your post is so ridiculous I feel compelled.

"Akron and Buffalo are football doormats, have bad facilities, and do not add much to the MAC across the board."

<a href='http://www.uakron.edu/nll/field_house.php' target='_blank'>http://www.uakron.edu/nll/field_house.php</a>

<a href='http://gozips.collegesports.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/lee-jackson-facility.html' target='_blank'>http://gozips.collegesports.com/sports/m-f...n-facility.html</a>

<a href='http://gozips.collegesports.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/020505aac.html' target='_blank'>http://gozips.collegesports.com/sports/m-f.../020505aac.html</a>

Conference Points Overall Points
Team W L T For Opp Pct W L T For Opp Pct
---- - - - --- --- --- - - - --- --- ---
Miami............... 7 1 0 282 158 .875 8 5 0 407 298 .615
Akron............... 6 2 0 237 217 .750 6 5 0 271 347 .545
Marshall............ 6 2 0 238 180 .750 6 6 0 291 266 .500
Kent State.......... 4 4 0 269 186 .500 5 6 0 335 264 .455
Ohio................ 2 6 0 148 217 .250 4 7 0 221 271 .364
Buffalo............. 2 6 0 167 247 .250 2 9 0 197 351 .182
UCF................. 0 8 0 136 246 .000 0 11 0 175 362 .000

If Michigan State doesnt blow a 21 point lead to hometown Hawaii, the Zips are going to a bowl. Not happy with second place finish, but in it til the end. I sure enjoyed watching the two nationally televised games against Marshall and Miami.

New stadium coming * top recruiting class* Football coach of the year * (likely basketball coach of the year) * Quarterback MVP of Senior Bowl* Has the soccer team EVER lost a MAC Championship?


"KSU has a great overall program and would be improved with Akron being shown the door"

This is the best part.......

Akron leads the all-time series with the Golden Flashes, 26-19-2. They have won eight of the last 10 meetings and have won the last four games at Dix Stadium (45-16 in 1998, 34-6 in 2000, 48-10 in 2002). Akron has not lost back-to-back games to Kent State since 1987-88.

They outscored Kent on their own turf 127-32 in the last 4 games!

I could go on, but this should suffice........ 03-confused 03-confused [I]
Flashy Wrote:The MAC should really consider contracting both Buffalo and Akron and add Southern Illinois and Middle Tennessee State.

Akron and Buffalo are football doormats, have bad facilities, and do not add much to the MAC across the board.&nbsp; If either program ceased to exist today there would be no real complaint from anyone except their alumni and judging from their fan support that would not be that big a deal either.&nbsp; More fans at Akron games wear Ohio State gear and the Buffalo fan base is more preoccupied with Syracuse, the Yankees, and the Bills.&nbsp; College Sports in Upstate NY is an afterthought.

The Cleveland media market would not miss Akron, as Kent State would still be here.&nbsp; KSU has a great overall program and would be improved with Akron being shown the door.&nbsp; Akron joined the MAC in 1992 and has not raised the bar, save for a occasional medicore football season.&nbsp; Boot em out.&nbsp; Replace Akron with MTSU and open up the region to a new media market in Nashville and gain southern exposure in recruiting.

Buffalo joined the league in the late 90's and despite having the highest budget in the MAC is by far the worst overall sports performer.&nbsp; They add no real media power to the MAC and travel no fans, just like Akron.&nbsp; Adding SIU would help NIU with a natual rival, would gain more of a hold in Illinois and in the Chicago media market, and would be a better solution long term.

WKU is a 1-A football wannabe and that makes them a no go in my book.&nbsp; We do not have time to wait on someone to ramp up their football program.&nbsp; Adding WKU is not a big improvement over either Akron or Buffalo.&nbsp; Just going to the NCAA Basketball Final Four 30 years ago does not impress me.&nbsp; Winning a 1-AA football title is like being the 120th best team in 1-A.

In order to really move forward the MAC should make real change, cut loose the dead weight and add in schools that make sense for the long run.
You are so wrong it’s not even funny; Kent is much more of a football doormat than Akron is. Akron played on national TV, won 6 games, and has had a number of NFL players lately. Both Akron and Buffalo had more people at their games than Kent did. Akron and Buffalo both have solid basketball programs. And have you ever seen Dix Stadium talk about the worst football facility in the MAC. Akron has the nicest indoor football facility in the MAC, and one of the best in the country. Buffalo has become a solid basketball program over the last two years, and Akron just had a big time recruiting class in football. Kent has 13,000 more students than Akron does and I still see more Akron gear than Kent gear in Northeast Ohio. There is no need to subtract any of the MAC schools right now, unless a bunch of big time D1 programs want to join the MAC.
Flashy -

Why would you think thw SIU would be better than WKU. Do you realize that both
are currently 1AA.

Kent has just been so good in football these last several years.

By the way, I think that both SIU and WKU would strengthen the conference overall.
Expanded markets, football programs that could step up and be competitive, and very good
BBall programs.

Both Akron and Buffalo are getting better in football and already have good basketball programs.
Disclaimer:

Flashy in no way represents the core of KSU fans. He is our KitKat. Ignore this post.

Sincerely,

KSU Flash Fans
a-zip Wrote:Football coach of the year * (likely basketball coach of the year)
=>Wouldn't just be awesome if Akron got coach of the year honors in both basketball and football, but Miami won the East in both sports! I am all for a repeat!

******

BTW, being I-AA champs is not the same as being 120 in DI-A. If I remember my history, the evil Herdiban won the MAC their first year after the jump from I-AA to I-A. After that, I learned to respect the top DI-A's.

SIU lost at NIU by 1 this year in DeKalb. I think NIU had a decent football team.

In 2003, Colgate pummeled Buffalo by 30.

The top 10 teams in I-AA would compete most season for the MAC title.

Sagarin's computer rankings had 3 DI-AA conferences ranked ahead of the MAC last year and there were 7 DI-AA schools ranked ahead of our Champion Toledo...

Conference Rankings:

<a href='http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc04.htm' target='_blank'>http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc04.htm</a>

Team Rankings:

<a href='http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt04.htm' target='_blank'>http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt04.htm</a>

[quote]CONFERENCE&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; CENTRAL MEAN&nbsp; &nbsp; SIMPLE AVERAGE&nbsp; TEAMS

&nbsp; 1&nbsp; ATLANTIC COAST&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (A) =&nbsp; 77.91&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 78.09&nbsp; (&nbsp; 2)&nbsp; &nbsp; 11
&nbsp; 2&nbsp; PAC-10&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (A) =&nbsp; 77.84&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 78.89&nbsp; (&nbsp; 1)&nbsp; &nbsp; 10
&nbsp; 3&nbsp; I-A INDEPENDENTS&nbsp; &nbsp; (A) =&nbsp; 76.98&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 76.98&nbsp; (&nbsp; 4)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2
&nbsp; 4&nbsp; BIG 12&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (A) =&nbsp; 76.42&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 77.08&nbsp; (&nbsp; 3)&nbsp; &nbsp; 12
&nbsp; 5&nbsp; BIG TEN&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (A) =&nbsp; 75.63&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 75.29&nbsp; (&nbsp; 5)&nbsp; &nbsp; 11
&nbsp; 6&nbsp; SOUTHEASTERN&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (A) =&nbsp; 74.13&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 74.31&nbsp; (&nbsp; 6)&nbsp; &nbsp; 12
&nbsp; 7&nbsp; MOUNTAIN WEST&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (A) =&nbsp; 72.08&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 72.91&nbsp; (&nbsp; 7)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 8
&nbsp; 8&nbsp; BIG EAST&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (A) =&nbsp; 71.98&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 71.56&nbsp; (&nbsp; 8)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 7
&nbsp; 9&nbsp; WESTERN ATHLETIC&nbsp; &nbsp; (A) =&nbsp; 67.40&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 68.40&nbsp; (&nbsp; 9)&nbsp; &nbsp; 10
&nbsp; 10&nbsp; ATLANTIC 10&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 65.74&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 65.14&nbsp; ( 11)&nbsp; &nbsp; 12
&nbsp; 11&nbsp; CONFERENCE USA&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (A) =&nbsp; 65.66&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 66.75&nbsp; ( 10)&nbsp; &nbsp; 11
&nbsp; 12&nbsp; SUN BELT&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (A) =&nbsp; 60.24&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 60.46&nbsp; ( 12)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 9
&nbsp; 13&nbsp; GREAT WEST&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 56.73&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 56.72&nbsp; ( 13)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 6
&nbsp; 14&nbsp; BIG SKY&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 55.90&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 56.49&nbsp; ( 14)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 8
&nbsp; 15&nbsp; MID-AMERICAN&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (A) =&nbsp; 55.69&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 56.35&nbsp; ( 15)&nbsp; &nbsp; 14
&nbsp; 16&nbsp; SOUTHLAND&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 55.53&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 55.73&nbsp; ( 17)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 6
&nbsp; 17&nbsp; IVY LEAGUE&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 54.93&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 55.78&nbsp; ( 16)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 8
&nbsp; 18&nbsp; SOUTHERN&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 52.40&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 52.82&nbsp; ( 18)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 8
&nbsp; 19&nbsp; PATRIOT LEAGUE&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 52.00&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 50.73&nbsp; ( 20)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 7
&nbsp; 20&nbsp; GATEWAY&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 51.30&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 52.16&nbsp; ( 19)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 8
&nbsp; 21&nbsp; I-AA INDEPENDENTS&nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 46.44&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 46.34&nbsp; ( 21)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 5
&nbsp; 22&nbsp; OHIO VALLEY&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 43.77&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 43.66&nbsp; ( 22)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 9
&nbsp; 23&nbsp; MID-EASTERN&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 41.90&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 41.90&nbsp; ( 23)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 8
&nbsp; 24&nbsp; BIG SOUTH&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 41.73&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 41.34&nbsp; ( 24)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 5
&nbsp; 25&nbsp; SOUTHWESTERN&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 38.70&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 37.75&nbsp; ( 25)&nbsp; &nbsp; 10
&nbsp; 26&nbsp; NORTHEAST&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 35.26&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 35.10&nbsp; ( 26)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 8
&nbsp; 27&nbsp; PIONEER&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 27.25&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 28.60&nbsp; ( 27)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 9
&nbsp; 28&nbsp; METRO ATLANTIC&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (AA)=&nbsp; 22.77&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 24.00&nbsp; ( 28)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 5
&nbsp; 29&nbsp; ***UNRATED***&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (**)= -99.00&nbsp; &nbsp; -99.00&nbsp; ( 29)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1

******

FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
&nbsp; 1&nbsp; Southern California&nbsp; A&nbsp; = 103.37&nbsp; 13&nbsp; 0&nbsp; 77.67(&nbsp; 7)&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 105.32&nbsp; &nbsp; 1 |&nbsp; 101.23&nbsp; &nbsp; 1
&nbsp; 2&nbsp; Auburn&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 93.33&nbsp; 13&nbsp; 0&nbsp; 71.09(&nbsp; 60)&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 100.97&nbsp; &nbsp; 2 |&nbsp; 88.73&nbsp; &nbsp; 8
&nbsp; 3&nbsp; Oklahoma&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 92.60&nbsp; 12&nbsp; 1&nbsp; 76.44(&nbsp; 13)&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 96.75&nbsp; &nbsp; 3 |&nbsp; 89.16&nbsp; &nbsp; 7
&nbsp; 4&nbsp; Utah&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 92.49&nbsp; 12&nbsp; 0&nbsp; 70.26(&nbsp; 67)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 92.08&nbsp; &nbsp; 5 |&nbsp; 92.18&nbsp; &nbsp; 4
&nbsp; 5&nbsp; Louisville&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 91.57&nbsp; 11&nbsp; 1&nbsp; 68.32(&nbsp; 82)&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 89.68&nbsp; &nbsp; 6 |&nbsp; 93.07&nbsp; &nbsp; 3
&nbsp; 6&nbsp; California&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 89.02&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 2&nbsp; 76.46(&nbsp; 12)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 85.00&nbsp; 12 |&nbsp; 94.46&nbsp; &nbsp; 2
&nbsp; 7&nbsp; Virginia Tech&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 88.55&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 73.68(&nbsp; 42)&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 87.99&nbsp; &nbsp; 9 |&nbsp; 88.40&nbsp; &nbsp; 9
&nbsp; 8&nbsp; Texas&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 88.48&nbsp; 11&nbsp; 1&nbsp; 74.74(&nbsp; 28)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 93.95&nbsp; &nbsp; 4 |&nbsp; 84.33&nbsp; 15
&nbsp; 9&nbsp; Miami-Florida&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 88.08&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 77.23(&nbsp; 9)&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 84.83&nbsp; 13 |&nbsp; 91.75&nbsp; &nbsp; 5
&nbsp; 10&nbsp; Boise State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 87.28&nbsp; 11&nbsp; 1&nbsp; 68.86(&nbsp; 78)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 84.79&nbsp; 14 |&nbsp; 89.61&nbsp; &nbsp; 6
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
&nbsp; 11&nbsp; Georgia&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 85.60&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 2&nbsp; 73.90(&nbsp; 41)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 88.04&nbsp; &nbsp; 8 |&nbsp; 82.94&nbsp; 20
&nbsp; 12&nbsp; Iowa&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 85.45&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 2&nbsp; 75.02(&nbsp; 22)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 86.78&nbsp; 10 |&nbsp; 83.60&nbsp; 17
&nbsp; 13&nbsp; Arizona State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 85.18&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 79.23(&nbsp; 3)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 85.07&nbsp; 11 |&nbsp; 84.58&nbsp; 14
&nbsp; 14&nbsp; Texas Tech&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 84.35&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 75.97(&nbsp; 14)&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 84.42&nbsp; 15 |&nbsp; 83.57&nbsp; 18
&nbsp; 15&nbsp; Tennessee&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 83.89&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 74.05(&nbsp; 37)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 88.41&nbsp; &nbsp; 7 |&nbsp; 79.98&nbsp; 25
&nbsp; 16&nbsp; Florida State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 83.70&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 74.61(&nbsp; 29)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 81.94&nbsp; 18 |&nbsp; 84.95&nbsp; 12
&nbsp; 17&nbsp; Oregon State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 83.29&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 79.57(&nbsp; 2)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 5&nbsp; |&nbsp; 80.87&nbsp; 21 |&nbsp; 85.42&nbsp; 11
&nbsp; 18&nbsp; LSU&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 82.69&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 73.00(&nbsp; 46)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 82.23&nbsp; 17 |&nbsp; 82.44&nbsp; 23
&nbsp; 19&nbsp; Michigan&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 82.60&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 74.22(&nbsp; 36)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 81.65&nbsp; 19 |&nbsp; 82.87&nbsp; 21
&nbsp; 20&nbsp; Fresno State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 82.22&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 68.32(&nbsp; 81)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 78.65&nbsp; 29 |&nbsp; 86.15&nbsp; 10
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
&nbsp; 21&nbsp; Ohio State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 81.71&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 74.25(&nbsp; 35)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 80.18&nbsp; 24 |&nbsp; 82.65&nbsp; 22
&nbsp; 22&nbsp; Virginia&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 81.65&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 75.01(&nbsp; 24)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 78.84&nbsp; 27 |&nbsp; 84.30&nbsp; 16
&nbsp; 23&nbsp; Texas A&M&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 80.81&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 79.01(&nbsp; 4)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 82.42&nbsp; 16 |&nbsp; 78.70&nbsp; 29
&nbsp; 24&nbsp; Purdue&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 80.21&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 73.12(&nbsp; 44)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 76.25&nbsp; 34 |&nbsp; 84.68&nbsp; 13
&nbsp; 25&nbsp; Georgia Tech&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 80.00&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 74.42(&nbsp; 33)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 79.63&nbsp; 26 |&nbsp; 79.65&nbsp; 26
&nbsp; 26&nbsp; Boston College&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 79.31&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 69.51(&nbsp; 74)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 80.18&nbsp; 23 |&nbsp; 77.81&nbsp; 33
&nbsp; 27&nbsp; Wisconsin&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 79.29&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 71.56(&nbsp; 56)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 80.67&nbsp; 22 |&nbsp; 77.36&nbsp; 34
&nbsp; 28&nbsp; Oklahoma State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 79.07&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 75.65(&nbsp; 17)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 5&nbsp; |&nbsp; 78.72&nbsp; 28 |&nbsp; 78.71&nbsp; 27
&nbsp; 29&nbsp; West Virginia&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 77.45&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 70.39(&nbsp; 65)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 77.74&nbsp; 31 |&nbsp; 76.47&nbsp; 37
&nbsp; 30&nbsp; Florida&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 77.20&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 71.37(&nbsp; 57)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 74.18&nbsp; 44 |&nbsp; 80.03&nbsp; 24
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
&nbsp; 31&nbsp; Notre Dame&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 77.15&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 78.02(&nbsp; 5)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 75.61&nbsp; 38 |&nbsp; 78.08&nbsp; 32
&nbsp; 32&nbsp; Colorado&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 76.92&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 74.94(&nbsp; 26)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 79.71&nbsp; 25 |&nbsp; 73.86&nbsp; 45
&nbsp; 33&nbsp; Navy&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 76.81&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 2&nbsp; 65.37(&nbsp; 99)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 77.46&nbsp; 32 |&nbsp; 75.49&nbsp; 41
&nbsp; 34&nbsp; UCLA&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 76.44&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 75.96(&nbsp; 15)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 71.05&nbsp; 65 |&nbsp; 83.23&nbsp; 19
&nbsp; 35&nbsp; North Carolina&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 76.35&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 80.32(&nbsp; 1)&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 6&nbsp; |&nbsp; 78.28&nbsp; 30 |&nbsp; 73.95&nbsp; 44
&nbsp; 36&nbsp; James Madison&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 76.34&nbsp; 13&nbsp; 2&nbsp; 64.30( 107)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 80.96&nbsp; 20 |&nbsp; 72.06&nbsp; 57
&nbsp; 37&nbsp; Harvard&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 76.11&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 0&nbsp; 53.55( 167)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 75.68&nbsp; 37 |&nbsp; 75.82&nbsp; 40
&nbsp; 38&nbsp; Minnesota&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 76.07&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 70.08(&nbsp; 69)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 73.16&nbsp; 50 |&nbsp; 78.70&nbsp; 28
&nbsp; 39&nbsp; Bowling Green&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 75.74&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 59.07( 127)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 73.02&nbsp; 51 |&nbsp; 78.12&nbsp; 31
&nbsp; 40&nbsp; NC State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 75.43&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 74.78(&nbsp; 27)&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 74.35&nbsp; 43 |&nbsp; 75.83&nbsp; 39
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
&nbsp; 41&nbsp; BYU&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 74.76&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 76.96(&nbsp; 11)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 72.51&nbsp; 53 |&nbsp; 76.51&nbsp; 35
&nbsp; 42&nbsp; UTEP&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 74.71&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 68.01(&nbsp; 83)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 75.33&nbsp; 39 |&nbsp; 73.42&nbsp; 50
&nbsp; 43&nbsp; New Mexico&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 74.63&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 74.43(&nbsp; 32)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 75.13&nbsp; 40 |&nbsp; 73.44&nbsp; 49
&nbsp; 44&nbsp; Arkansas&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 74.55&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 74.01(&nbsp; 38)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 5&nbsp; |&nbsp; 72.13&nbsp; 57 |&nbsp; 76.49&nbsp; 36
&nbsp; 45&nbsp; Clemson&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 74.48&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 75.16(&nbsp; 20)&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 75.97&nbsp; 36 |&nbsp; 72.42&nbsp; 55
&nbsp; 46&nbsp; Stanford&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 74.04&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 77.23(&nbsp; 10)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 69.99&nbsp; 72 |&nbsp; 78.23&nbsp; 30
&nbsp; 47&nbsp; Maryland&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 73.84&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 75.09(&nbsp; 21)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 73.27&nbsp; 49 |&nbsp; 73.69&nbsp; 47
&nbsp; 48&nbsp; Connecticut&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 73.67&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 65.42(&nbsp; 98)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 74.99&nbsp; 42 |&nbsp; 71.75&nbsp; 59
&nbsp; 49&nbsp; Wyoming&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 73.60&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 70.51(&nbsp; 63)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 73.57&nbsp; 47 |&nbsp; 72.92&nbsp; 51
&nbsp; 50&nbsp; New Hampshire&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 73.54&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 64.94( 103)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 72.71&nbsp; 52 |&nbsp; 73.67&nbsp; 48
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
&nbsp; 51&nbsp; Oregon&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 73.33&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 74.50(&nbsp; 30)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 70.46&nbsp; 67 |&nbsp; 75.84&nbsp; 38
&nbsp; 52&nbsp; Iowa State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 73.20&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 71.95(&nbsp; 51)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 75.10&nbsp; 41 |&nbsp; 70.78&nbsp; 63
&nbsp; 53&nbsp; Washington State&nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 73.02&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 75.50(&nbsp; 18)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 72.44&nbsp; 54 |&nbsp; 72.89&nbsp; 52
&nbsp; 54&nbsp; South Carolina&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 72.98&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 71.08(&nbsp; 61)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 71.57&nbsp; 63 |&nbsp; 73.74&nbsp; 46
&nbsp; 55&nbsp; Pittsburgh&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 72.67&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 70.37(&nbsp; 66)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 76.63&nbsp; 33 |&nbsp; 68.66&nbsp; 75
&nbsp; 56&nbsp; Northwestern&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 72.54&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 74.38(&nbsp; 34)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 73.64&nbsp; 46 |&nbsp; 70.81&nbsp; 62
&nbsp; 57&nbsp; Kansas&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 72.52&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 75.28(&nbsp; 19)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 71.69&nbsp; 61 |&nbsp; 72.65&nbsp; 53
&nbsp; 58&nbsp; William & Mary&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 71.86&nbsp; 11&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 61.76( 117)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 76.03&nbsp; 35 |&nbsp; 67.67&nbsp; 79
&nbsp; 59&nbsp; Alabama&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 71.79&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 69.66(&nbsp; 73)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 68.16&nbsp; 78 |&nbsp; 75.24&nbsp; 42
&nbsp; 60&nbsp; Missouri&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 71.60&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 69.49(&nbsp; 75)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 70.18&nbsp; 71 |&nbsp; 72.35&nbsp; 56
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
&nbsp; 61&nbsp; Kansas State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 71.40&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 73.97(&nbsp; 39)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 70.46&nbsp; 68 |&nbsp; 71.65&nbsp; 60
&nbsp; 62&nbsp; Syracuse&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 71.35&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 73.05(&nbsp; 45)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 5&nbsp; |&nbsp; 73.38&nbsp; 48 |&nbsp; 68.80&nbsp; 74
&nbsp; 63&nbsp; Penn State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 71.23&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 71.65(&nbsp; 54)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 5&nbsp; |&nbsp; 67.50&nbsp; 84 |&nbsp; 74.80&nbsp; 43
&nbsp; 64&nbsp; Montana&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 71.14&nbsp; 12&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 58.41( 134)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 71.21&nbsp; 64 |&nbsp; 70.37&nbsp; 64
&nbsp; 65&nbsp; Cincinnati&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 70.90&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 68.91(&nbsp; 77)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 71.59&nbsp; 62 |&nbsp; 69.52&nbsp; 69
&nbsp; 66&nbsp; Michigan State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 70.86&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 72.08(&nbsp; 50)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 69.18&nbsp; 73 |&nbsp; 71.90&nbsp; 58
&nbsp; 67&nbsp; Wake Forest&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 70.69&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 72.25(&nbsp; 48)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 70.40&nbsp; 69 |&nbsp; 70.27&nbsp; 65
&nbsp; 68&nbsp; Nebraska&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 70.62&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 71.63(&nbsp; 55)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 72.02&nbsp; 58 |&nbsp; 68.60&nbsp; 76
&nbsp; 69&nbsp; Northern Illinois&nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 70.52&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 59.87( 124)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 70.71&nbsp; 66 |&nbsp; 69.63&nbsp; 68
&nbsp; 70&nbsp; Delaware&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 70.02&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 66.56(&nbsp; 94)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 72.33&nbsp; 55 |&nbsp; 67.21&nbsp; 83
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
&nbsp; 71&nbsp; Louisiana Tech&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 69.68&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 74.47(&nbsp; 31)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 74.07&nbsp; 45 |&nbsp; 65.22&nbsp; 96
&nbsp; 72&nbsp; Air Force&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 69.67&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 72.13(&nbsp; 49)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 68.74&nbsp; 77 |&nbsp; 69.91&nbsp; 66
&nbsp; 73&nbsp; Southern Miss&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 69.59&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 67.59(&nbsp; 86)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 72.30&nbsp; 56 |&nbsp; 66.44&nbsp; 88
&nbsp; 74&nbsp; Hawaii&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 69.41&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 66.83(&nbsp; 93)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 71.95&nbsp; 59 |&nbsp; 66.40&nbsp; 90
&nbsp; 75&nbsp; Memphis&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 69.21&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 65.42(&nbsp; 97)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 71.92&nbsp; 60 |&nbsp; 66.06&nbsp; 92
&nbsp; 76&nbsp; Arizona&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 69.12&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 77.99(&nbsp; 6)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 5&nbsp; |&nbsp; 67.74&nbsp; 81 |&nbsp; 69.84&nbsp; 67
&nbsp; 77&nbsp; Troy&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 68.95&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 65.25( 100)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 67.91&nbsp; 80 |&nbsp; 69.28&nbsp; 71
&nbsp; 78&nbsp; Colorado State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 68.33&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 75.01(&nbsp; 23)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 67.48&nbsp; 85 |&nbsp; 68.46&nbsp; 78
&nbsp; 79&nbsp; UAB&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 68.32&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 66.93(&nbsp; 92)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 70.23&nbsp; 70 |&nbsp; 65.83&nbsp; 94
&nbsp; 80&nbsp; Villanova&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 68.15&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 63.99( 108)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 66.29&nbsp; 89 |&nbsp; 69.37&nbsp; 70
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
&nbsp; 81&nbsp; San Diego State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 67.81&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 71.72(&nbsp; 52)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 66.42&nbsp; 88 |&nbsp; 68.51&nbsp; 77
&nbsp; 82&nbsp; Mississippi&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 67.53&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 72.55(&nbsp; 47)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 67.66&nbsp; 83 |&nbsp; 66.69&nbsp; 86
&nbsp; 83&nbsp; Toledo&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 67.20&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 61.87( 116)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 68.75&nbsp; 76 |&nbsp; 65.02&nbsp; 98
&nbsp; 84&nbsp; Georgia Southern&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 67.00&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 56.77( 146)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 61.65&nbsp; 113 |&nbsp; 72.44&nbsp; 54
&nbsp; 85&nbsp; Florida Atlantic&nbsp; &nbsp; A* =&nbsp; 66.84&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 58.39( 135)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 69.07&nbsp; 75 |&nbsp; 64.04&nbsp; 100
&nbsp; 86&nbsp; Sam Houston State&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 66.49&nbsp; 11&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 56.90( 144)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 67.45&nbsp; 86 |&nbsp; 64.85&nbsp; 99
&nbsp; 87&nbsp; Northeastern&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 66.48&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 67.33(&nbsp; 87)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 63.50&nbsp; 103 |&nbsp; 68.93&nbsp; 72
&nbsp; 88&nbsp; Eastern Washington&nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 66.48&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 58.75( 131)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 63.55&nbsp; 100 |&nbsp; 68.87&nbsp; 73
&nbsp; 89&nbsp; Southern Illinois&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 66.43&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 2&nbsp; 51.23( 178)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 61.39&nbsp; 115 |&nbsp; 71.39&nbsp; 61
&nbsp; 90&nbsp; Duke&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 66.24&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 75.68(&nbsp; 16)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 65.35&nbsp; 92 |&nbsp; 66.41&nbsp; 89
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
&nbsp; 91&nbsp; TCU&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 66.11&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 68.57(&nbsp; 80)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 67.70&nbsp; 82 |&nbsp; 63.88&nbsp; 103
&nbsp; 92&nbsp; Miami-Ohio&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 65.90&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 59.47( 126)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 63.86&nbsp; 98 |&nbsp; 67.30&nbsp; 81
&nbsp; 93&nbsp; Maine&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 65.40&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 64.62( 104)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 63.41&nbsp; 104 |&nbsp; 66.75&nbsp; 85
&nbsp; 94&nbsp; Rutgers&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 65.31&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 70.15(&nbsp; 68)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 65.89&nbsp; 91 |&nbsp; 64.03&nbsp; 101
&nbsp; 95&nbsp; Cal Poly-SLO&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 65.30&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 2&nbsp; 55.91( 151)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 63.33&nbsp; 105 |&nbsp; 66.62&nbsp; 87
&nbsp; 96&nbsp; Furman&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 65.29&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 54.08( 163)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 62.64&nbsp; 108 |&nbsp; 67.34&nbsp; 80
&nbsp; 97&nbsp; Massachusetts&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 64.78&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 64.31( 106)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 65.09&nbsp; 94 |&nbsp; 63.76&nbsp; 104
&nbsp; 98&nbsp; Indiana&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 64.55&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 71.28(&nbsp; 59)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 61.74&nbsp; 112 |&nbsp; 66.77&nbsp; 84
&nbsp; 99&nbsp; Hofstra&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 64.41&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 61.06( 119)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 61.06&nbsp; 117 |&nbsp; 67.21&nbsp; 82
100&nbsp; Pennsylvania&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 64.12&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 2&nbsp; 55.15( 156)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 63.53&nbsp; 101 |&nbsp; 64.00&nbsp; 102
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
101&nbsp; Illinois&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 63.72&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 69.04(&nbsp; 76)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 60.52&nbsp; 122 |&nbsp; 66.35&nbsp; 91
102&nbsp; North Texas&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 63.63&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 65.22( 101)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 69.18&nbsp; 74 |&nbsp; 57.85&nbsp; 125
103&nbsp; Baylor&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 63.43&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 74.94(&nbsp; 25)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 68.05&nbsp; 79 |&nbsp; 58.42&nbsp; 120
104&nbsp; New Mexico State&nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 63.11&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 67.68(&nbsp; 85)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 67.40&nbsp; 87 |&nbsp; 58.38&nbsp; 121
105&nbsp; Tulsa&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 63.02&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 68.01(&nbsp; 84)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 64.37&nbsp; 96 |&nbsp; 60.98&nbsp; 113
106&nbsp; Marshall&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 62.67&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 62.88( 112)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 60.94&nbsp; 118 |&nbsp; 63.72&nbsp; 105
107&nbsp; Rice&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 62.50&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 69.87(&nbsp; 71)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 63.27&nbsp; 106 |&nbsp; 61.04&nbsp; 112
108&nbsp; Washington&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 62.11&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 77.53(&nbsp; 8)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 57.77&nbsp; 130 |&nbsp; 65.93&nbsp; 93
109&nbsp; Portland State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 62.06&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 57.66( 139)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 58.33&nbsp; 129 |&nbsp; 65.21&nbsp; 97
110&nbsp; UNLV&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 62.01&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 73.27(&nbsp; 43)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 61.14&nbsp; 116 |&nbsp; 62.18&nbsp; 108
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
111&nbsp; Lehigh&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 61.48&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 49.92( 180)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 59.58&nbsp; 126 |&nbsp; 62.70&nbsp; 107
112&nbsp; Vanderbilt&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 61.34&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 70.71(&nbsp; 62)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 56.42&nbsp; 135 |&nbsp; 65.72&nbsp; 95
113&nbsp; Houston&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 61.33&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 71.30(&nbsp; 58)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 63.52&nbsp; 102 |&nbsp; 58.47&nbsp; 119
114&nbsp; Mississippi State&nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 61.30&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 70.07(&nbsp; 70)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 60.70&nbsp; 120 |&nbsp; 61.19&nbsp; 110
115&nbsp; Temple&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 61.15&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 70.46(&nbsp; 64)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 3&nbsp; |&nbsp; 62.28&nbsp; 110 |&nbsp; 59.31&nbsp; 117
116&nbsp; South Florida&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 60.87&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 67.08(&nbsp; 90)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 64.57&nbsp; 95 |&nbsp; 56.56&nbsp; 132
117&nbsp; Tulane&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 60.61&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 65.16( 102)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 66.15&nbsp; 90 |&nbsp; 54.54&nbsp; 144
118&nbsp; Nevada&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 60.49&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 64.33( 105)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 62.35&nbsp; 109 |&nbsp; 57.93&nbsp; 124
119&nbsp; Middle Tennessee&nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 60.46&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 62.69( 114)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 64.07&nbsp; 97 |&nbsp; 56.20&nbsp; 135
120&nbsp; Western Kentucky&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 60.44&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 55.07( 157)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 63.01&nbsp; 107 |&nbsp; 57.21&nbsp; 129
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
121&nbsp; Lafayette&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 60.24&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 53.11( 169)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 59.48&nbsp; 128 |&nbsp; 60.30&nbsp; 115
122&nbsp; Louisiana-Lafayette&nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 59.97&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 61.91( 115)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 60.88&nbsp; 119 |&nbsp; 58.36&nbsp; 122
123&nbsp; Louisiana-Monroe&nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 59.74&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 65.55(&nbsp; 96)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 65.31&nbsp; 93 |&nbsp; 53.56&nbsp; 150
124&nbsp; North Dakota State&nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 59.62&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 51.54( 175)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 57.44&nbsp; 131 |&nbsp; 61.09&nbsp; 111
125&nbsp; Kentucky&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 59.54&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 73.94(&nbsp; 40)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 5&nbsp; |&nbsp; 55.67&nbsp; 140 |&nbsp; 62.73&nbsp; 106
126&nbsp; SMU&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 59.10&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 71.72(&nbsp; 53)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 4&nbsp; |&nbsp; 63.71&nbsp; 99 |&nbsp; 53.80&nbsp; 149
127&nbsp; Army&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 58.99&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 68.78(&nbsp; 79)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 60.66&nbsp; 121 |&nbsp; 56.61&nbsp; 131
128&nbsp; Northern Iowa&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 58.98&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 53.89( 164)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 56.62&nbsp; 132 |&nbsp; 60.63&nbsp; 114
129&nbsp; NW Louisiana&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 58.39&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 53.15( 168)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 59.87&nbsp; 124 |&nbsp; 56.20&nbsp; 136
130&nbsp; Akron&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 58.00&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 60.40( 122)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 59.55&nbsp; 127 |&nbsp; 55.73&nbsp; 138
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
131&nbsp; Colgate&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 57.79&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 52.12( 172)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 55.82&nbsp; 139 |&nbsp; 59.03&nbsp; 118
132&nbsp; UC Davis&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 57.64&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 55.18( 155)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 54.82&nbsp; 142 |&nbsp; 59.73&nbsp; 116
133&nbsp; Montana State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 57.63&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 58.31( 137)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 56.27&nbsp; 136 |&nbsp; 58.27&nbsp; 123
134&nbsp; Kent State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 57.34&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 57.34( 141)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 52.18&nbsp; 155 |&nbsp; 61.68&nbsp; 109
135&nbsp; Utah State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 57.18&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 67.21(&nbsp; 88)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 62.11&nbsp; 111 |&nbsp; 51.41&nbsp; 158
136&nbsp; Arkansas State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 57.17&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 66.04(&nbsp; 95)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 61.65&nbsp; 114 |&nbsp; 51.87&nbsp; 155
137&nbsp; East Carolina&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 56.71&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 69.70(&nbsp; 72)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 60.21&nbsp; 123 |&nbsp; 52.41&nbsp; 153
138&nbsp; Jacksonville State&nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 56.33&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 2&nbsp; 45.05( 192)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 54.62&nbsp; 144 |&nbsp; 57.31&nbsp; 128
139&nbsp; Richmond&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 56.20&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 63.73( 109)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 56.08&nbsp; 138 |&nbsp; 55.60&nbsp; 140
140&nbsp; Hampton&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 56.05&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 2&nbsp; 41.14( 205)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 53.56&nbsp; 152 |&nbsp; 57.78&nbsp; 126
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
141&nbsp; Appalachian State&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 55.70&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 54.49( 161)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 54.33&nbsp; 147 |&nbsp; 56.34&nbsp; 133
142&nbsp; San Jose State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 55.64&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 67.13(&nbsp; 89)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 56.50&nbsp; 134 |&nbsp; 54.06&nbsp; 147
143&nbsp; Princeton&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 55.57&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 55.45( 154)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 52.99&nbsp; 153 |&nbsp; 57.39&nbsp; 127
144&nbsp; Texas State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 55.56&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 58.53( 133)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 56.16&nbsp; 137 |&nbsp; 54.23&nbsp; 146
145&nbsp; Bucknell&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 55.42&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 51.42( 176)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 53.77&nbsp; 150 |&nbsp; 56.34&nbsp; 134
146&nbsp; Stephen F. Austin&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 55.41&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 54.57( 160)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 54.56&nbsp; 146 |&nbsp; 55.54&nbsp; 141
147&nbsp; Rhode Island&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 55.37&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 60.50( 121)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 55.42&nbsp; 141 |&nbsp; 54.60&nbsp; 143
148&nbsp; Brown&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 55.35&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 53.09( 170)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 53.95&nbsp; 149 |&nbsp; 56.03&nbsp; 137
149&nbsp; South Dakota State&nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 55.19&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 59.90( 123)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 53.95&nbsp; 148 |&nbsp; 55.71&nbsp; 139
150&nbsp; Southern Utah&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 55.19&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 53.78( 165)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 52.77&nbsp; 154 |&nbsp; 56.85&nbsp; 130
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
151&nbsp; Wofford&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 54.24&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 49.32( 184)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 54.66&nbsp; 143 |&nbsp; 53.08&nbsp; 152
152&nbsp; Idaho&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 53.97&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 66.94(&nbsp; 91)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 59.69&nbsp; 125 |&nbsp; 46.93&nbsp; 178
153&nbsp; Ohio U.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 53.59&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 58.63( 132)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 52.03&nbsp; 156 |&nbsp; 54.41&nbsp; 145
154&nbsp; Yale&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 53.22&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 55.47( 153)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 51.75&nbsp; 157 |&nbsp; 53.95&nbsp; 148
155&nbsp; Cornell&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 52.72&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 55.59( 152)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 49.50&nbsp; 165 |&nbsp; 55.07&nbsp; 142
156&nbsp; Northern Arizona&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 51.92&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 58.35( 136)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 49.57&nbsp; 163 |&nbsp; 53.46&nbsp; 151
157&nbsp; Alabama State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 51.69&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 2&nbsp; 37.05( 217)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 50.83&nbsp; 159 |&nbsp; 51.83&nbsp; 156
158&nbsp; Nicholls State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 51.66&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 52.45( 171)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 53.65&nbsp; 151 |&nbsp; 48.84&nbsp; 168
159&nbsp; Coastal Carolina&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 51.12&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 1&nbsp; 30.16( 236)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 56.50&nbsp; 133 |&nbsp; 44.11&nbsp; 189
160&nbsp; SMS(SW Missouri St.) AA =&nbsp; 50.82&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 53.62( 166)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 54.61&nbsp; 145 |&nbsp; 45.86&nbsp; 182
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
161&nbsp; Fla. International&nbsp; A* =&nbsp; 50.68&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 56.25( 150)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 51.19&nbsp; 158 |&nbsp; 49.45&nbsp; 166
162&nbsp; Idaho State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 50.10&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 58.30( 138)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 48.25&nbsp; 171 |&nbsp; 51.17&nbsp; 160
163&nbsp; Eastern Michigan&nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 50.01&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 57.27( 142)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 49.03&nbsp; 169 |&nbsp; 50.27&nbsp; 161
164&nbsp; Towson&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 49.17&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 63.24( 110)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 50.47&nbsp; 160 |&nbsp; 47.08&nbsp; 177
165&nbsp; Bethune-Cookman&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 49.02&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 42.11( 203)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 44.57&nbsp; 188 |&nbsp; 52.29&nbsp; 154
166&nbsp; Citadel&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 48.91&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 60.53( 120)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 45.59&nbsp; 181 |&nbsp; 51.25&nbsp; 159
167&nbsp; So. Carolina State&nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 48.87&nbsp; &nbsp; 9&nbsp; 2&nbsp; 40.17( 209)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 49.49&nbsp; 166 |&nbsp; 47.51&nbsp; 176
168&nbsp; Eastern Kentucky&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 48.83&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 47.77( 187)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 48.98&nbsp; 170 |&nbsp; 47.95&nbsp; 171
169&nbsp; Western Carolina&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 48.80&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 54.96( 158)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 46.96&nbsp; 176 |&nbsp; 49.85&nbsp; 163
170&nbsp; Central Michigan&nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 48.42&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 57.50( 140)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 48.02&nbsp; 173 |&nbsp; 48.11&nbsp; 170
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
171&nbsp; Murray State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 48.34&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 46.96( 189)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 49.66&nbsp; 162 |&nbsp; 46.22&nbsp; 181
172&nbsp; Fordham&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 48.09&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 48.66( 185)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 45.40&nbsp; 183 |&nbsp; 49.89&nbsp; 162
173&nbsp; Drake&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 47.86&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 2&nbsp; 32.79( 225)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 49.35&nbsp; 167 |&nbsp; 45.55&nbsp; 183
174&nbsp; SE Louisiana&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 47.44&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 44.26( 194)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 45.79&nbsp; 180 |&nbsp; 48.31&nbsp; 169
175&nbsp; Northern Colorado&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 47.40&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 59.68( 125)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 46.45&nbsp; 179 |&nbsp; 47.63&nbsp; 173
176&nbsp; Illinois State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 47.27&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 56.47( 149)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 49.10&nbsp; 168 |&nbsp; 44.55&nbsp; 188
177&nbsp; McNeese State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 46.89&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 54.48( 162)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 49.69&nbsp; 161 |&nbsp; 42.98&nbsp; 192
178&nbsp; Liberty&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 46.87&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 47.94( 186)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 48.07&nbsp; 172 |&nbsp; 44.88&nbsp; 186
179&nbsp; Buffalo&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 46.67&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 59.03( 128)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 44.82&nbsp; 186 |&nbsp; 47.72&nbsp; 172
180&nbsp; Sacramento State&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 46.62&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 58.89( 130)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 49.53&nbsp; 164 |&nbsp; 42.55&nbsp; 194
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
181&nbsp; Ball State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 46.50&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 62.84( 113)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 42.55&nbsp; 194 |&nbsp; 49.29&nbsp; 167
182&nbsp; Southern U.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 46.34&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 39.42( 211)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 45.50&nbsp; 182 |&nbsp; 46.45&nbsp; 180
183&nbsp; Youngstown State&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 46.25&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 51.55( 174)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 47.10&nbsp; 175 |&nbsp; 44.63&nbsp; 187
184&nbsp; Weber State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 45.96&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 59.02( 129)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 43.40&nbsp; 191 |&nbsp; 47.62&nbsp; 174
185&nbsp; Dartmouth&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 45.85&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 57.04( 143)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 36.92&nbsp; 211 |&nbsp; 51.75&nbsp; 157
186&nbsp; San Diego&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 45.81&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 36.80( 218)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 43.88&nbsp; 190 |&nbsp; 46.92&nbsp; 179
187&nbsp; Ark.-Pine Bluff&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 45.57&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 37.09( 216)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 39.47&nbsp; 202 |&nbsp; 49.82&nbsp; 164
188&nbsp; Tennessee Tech&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 44.66&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 43.94( 195)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 45.32&nbsp; 184 |&nbsp; 43.25&nbsp; 191
189&nbsp; Gardner-Webb&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 44.65&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 47.47( 188)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 46.45&nbsp; 178 |&nbsp; 41.92&nbsp; 195
190&nbsp; Eastern Illinois&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 44.07&nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; 6&nbsp; 44.87( 193)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 44.58&nbsp; 187 |&nbsp; 42.81&nbsp; 193
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
191&nbsp; UCF(Central Florida) A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 44.01&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 11&nbsp; 63.00( 111)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 2&nbsp; |&nbsp; 35.03&nbsp; 215 |&nbsp; 49.71&nbsp; 165
192&nbsp; Indiana State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 43.58&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 51.39( 177)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 47.71&nbsp; 174 |&nbsp; 37.56&nbsp; 211
193&nbsp; Western Illinois&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 43.54&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 56.89( 145)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 46.81&nbsp; 177 |&nbsp; 38.82&nbsp; 207
194&nbsp; Columbia&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 43.29&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 56.67( 147)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 36.95&nbsp; 210 |&nbsp; 47.52&nbsp; 175
195&nbsp; Monmouth-NJ&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 42.62&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 1&nbsp; 29.12( 237)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 44.42&nbsp; 189 |&nbsp; 39.86&nbsp; 203
196&nbsp; Dayton&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 42.44&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 30.88( 234)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 38.66&nbsp; 205 |&nbsp; 44.96&nbsp; 185
197&nbsp; Western Michigan&nbsp; &nbsp; A&nbsp; =&nbsp; 42.31&nbsp; &nbsp; 1&nbsp; 10&nbsp; 61.14( 118)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 37.92&nbsp; 207 |&nbsp; 45.27&nbsp; 184
198&nbsp; Central Conn. State&nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 42.09&nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; 2&nbsp; 33.78( 222)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 45.04&nbsp; 185 |&nbsp; 37.79&nbsp; 210
199&nbsp; Elon&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 41.74&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 49.78( 182)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 41.65&nbsp; 197 |&nbsp; 41.12&nbsp; 198
200&nbsp; Alcorn State&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 41.74&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 38.58( 214)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 42.66&nbsp; 193 |&nbsp; 40.04&nbsp; 201
FINAL College Football 2004 thru Tuesday, January 4, 2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE=&nbsp; 3.85&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RATING&nbsp; &nbsp; W&nbsp; L&nbsp; SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp; ELO-CHESS&nbsp; |&nbsp; PREDICTOR&nbsp;
201&nbsp; Samford&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 41.64&nbsp; &nbsp; 4&nbsp; 7&nbsp; 49.66( 183)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 1&nbsp; |&nbsp; 41.04&nbsp; 199 |&nbsp; 41.51&nbsp; 196
202&nbsp; Duquesne&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 41.55&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 3&nbsp; 31.56( 231)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 37.90&nbsp; 208 |&nbsp; 43.97&nbsp; 190
203&nbsp; Howard&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 41.20&nbsp; &nbsp; 6&nbsp; 5&nbsp; 40.04( 210)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 41.93&nbsp; 196 |&nbsp; 39.70&nbsp; 204
204&nbsp; Alabama A&M&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 40.96&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; 4&nbsp; 35.80( 219)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 39.84&nbsp; 201 |&nbsp; 41.33&nbsp; 197
205&nbsp; Chattanooga&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 40.90&nbsp; &nbsp; 2&nbsp; 9&nbsp; 54.78( 159)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 42.40&nbsp; 195 |&nbsp; 38.48&nbsp; 208
206&nbsp; SE Missouri State&nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 40.81&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 50.39( 179)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; 0&nbsp; |&nbsp; 40.69&nbsp; 200 |&nbsp; 40.22&nbsp; 200
207&nbsp; Florida A&M&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AA =&nbsp; 40.67&nbsp; &nbsp; 3&nbsp; 8&nbsp; 56.48( 148)&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp;
WKU Topper Jeff Wrote:I dare say WKU has better winning percentage against I-AA schools then MTSU does with I-AA schools.
Didn't check per team but MTSU won 59% of games while in I-AA WKU has won 56%.
ArkStfan, it was a slight jab at MTSU's inability to defeat I-AA schools now that they are I-A. What is their record against I-AA since being I-A?
Since moving they've won 75% against schools that are classified I-AA and at or below the I-AA scholarship limit.

WKU using the same criteria has won 74% against I-AA.
That is the dumbest post I have ever read on this site and that says a lot.
arkstfan Wrote:Since moving they've won 75% against schools that are classified I-AA and at or below the I-AA scholarship limit.

WKU using the same criteria has won 74% against I-AA.
Then I made a good point, considering they still lost a 4th of their I-A games depsite having how many more scholarship players??
Actually, I like having Akron in the MAC and would not have said this three years ago. The rivalry has really heated up again in both football and basketball, drawing big crowds and local interest. You'd think this would trickle over into increased interest from casual fans, i.e. NE Ohio residents not associated by family or alumni ties to either school. Plus, nothing makes you better than good local competition.

My botom line is that Hilltop High (oops, I mean the University of Akron 03-wink ) and Kent State can and will both hold their own in the MAC. The rivalry will continue to roar which will be ultimately good for more media coverage and fan interest.

Don't tell me Flashy is really one of ours! :crying:
Its posts like this, that make me happy to be a UB fan. One day we will be good, and i can not wait to throw this back at you. Buffalo football sucks now, no arguements there. But if we get good, you better believe that we will be close to the top in attendance. Just look at basketball, if we win, Buffalo students,alum and locals will go. Last time i checked you had one of the most entertaining QB's in the conference and couldnt draw flies.

BTW no offense to any of the good KSU fans, just flashy here. Kent is the one school i can see (hope) UB developing a solid rivalry with.
Flashy Wrote:The MAC should really consider contracting both Buffalo and Akron and add Southern Illinois and Middle Tennessee State.

Akron and Buffalo are football doormats, have bad facilities, and do not add much to the MAC across the board.&nbsp; If either program ceased to exist today there would be no real complaint from anyone except their alumni and judging from their fan support that would not be that big a deal either.&nbsp; More fans at Akron games wear Ohio State gear and the Buffalo fan base is more preoccupied with Syracuse, the Yankees, and the Bills.&nbsp; College Sports in Upstate NY is an afterthought.

The Cleveland media market would not miss Akron, as Kent State would still be here.&nbsp; KSU has a great overall program and would be improved with Akron being shown the door.&nbsp; Akron joined the MAC in 1992 and has not raised the bar, save for a occasional medicore football season.&nbsp; Boot em out.&nbsp; Replace Akron with MTSU and open up the region to a new media market in Nashville and gain southern exposure in recruiting.

Buffalo joined the league in the late 90's and despite having the highest budget in the MAC is by far the worst overall sports performer.&nbsp; They add no real media power to the MAC and travel no fans, just like Akron.&nbsp; Adding SIU would help NIU with a natual rival, would gain more of a hold in Illinois and in the Chicago media market, and would be a better solution long term.

WKU is a 1-A football wannabe and that makes them a no go in my book.&nbsp; We do not have time to wait on someone to ramp up their football program.&nbsp; Adding WKU is not a big improvement over either Akron or Buffalo.&nbsp; Just going to the NCAA Basketball Final Four 30 years ago does not impress me.&nbsp; Winning a 1-AA football title is like being the 120th best team in 1-A.

In order to really move forward the MAC should make real change, cut loose the dead weight and add in schools that make sense for the long run.


First Flashy, you are the perfect example of just why you should never date your cousin....even if she does have all her teeth... :D

Second.. what A-Zip said x2!! 04-rock



Third, Yes, we have been down for awhile but did you look around lately? 25,000 for Marshall game on ESPN2, 18,000 the following home game vs Miami for MAC EAST CHAMPIONSHIP!

Dick's Stadium was E-M-P-T-Y this year. 64,000 fans all season. Take out the 25,000 you got for Akron game and a paltry 7,000 per game average. We may only average 10 to 15k but they are die hards and always there.... And this year 17k for MTSU, 25k for Marshall and 18k for Miami.

<a href='http://www.web1.ncass.org/d1mfb/Internet/attendance/ia_attendance.html' target='_blank'>Official NCAA Attendance Figures</a>

Basketball is 15-7 and your beloved Flashers are looking up at us in the standings.. and believe me, we are looking forward to the rematch... 03-nutkick

And finally... "Here's your sign!"

[Image: Picture-9.jpg]
FWIW- The argument to boot out either Kent or Akron from the MAC because of their proximity would have the ACC drop eith North Carolina or Duke because of their proximity.

Both Kent and Akron have a tough time getting much press in Cleveland media because they compete with pro teams, not because they have to cover 2 MAC teams.
Flashy Wrote:The MAC should really consider contracting both Buffalo and Akron and add Southern Illinois and Middle Tennessee State.
If I were forced to eliminate two schools from the MAC, I'd zap Eastern Michigan instead of Buffalo.

Moot point, though. The MAC won't be eliminating schools any time soon, I don't think.

I don't agree with your expansion choices, either.

Anonymous

klingon288 Wrote:FWIW- The argument to boot out either Kent or Akron from the MAC because of their proximity would have the ACC drop eith North Carolina or Duke because of their proximity.

Both Kent and Akron have a tough time getting much press in Cleveland media because they compete with pro teams, not because they have to cover 2 MAC teams.
When did Cleveland get pro teams?
Pages: 1 2 3
Reference URL's