CSNbbs

Full Version: Scenarios with 2 unfinished games
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Courtesy of slf on MHT.
Quote:If Buffalo and Kent win:

1) Miami (12-6)
2) Toledo (11-7) (1-0 vs WMU)
3) WMU (11-7) (3-2 in TB)
4) Ohio (11-7) (4-3 in TB) (1-0 vs Toledo)
5) Kent (11-7) (4-3 in TB) (0-1 vs Toledo)
6) Akron (11-7) (3-4 in TB)
7) Buffalo (11-7) (3-5 in TB)
8) BG (10-8) (1-0 vs Miami)
9) Ball State (10-8) (1-1 vs Miami)
10) NIU (7-11)
11) EMU (5-13)
12) CMU (4-14)
13) [screw 'em] (3-15)

If Akron and Ohio win:

1) Akron (12-6) (3-1 TB)
2) Toledo (11-7) (1-0 vs WMU)
3) Miami (12-6) (2-2 TB)
4) Ohio (12-6) (1-3 TB)
5) WMU (11-7)
6) BG (10-8) (3-1 TB)
7) Buffalo (10-8) (2-2 TB) (1-0 vs BSU)
8) Ball State (10-8) (2-2 TB) (0-1 vs Buf)
9) Kent (10-8) (1-3 TB)
10) NIU (7-11)
11) EMU (5-13)
12) CMU (4-14)
13) [screw 'em] (3-15)

If Buffalo and Ohio win

1) Ohio (12-6) (2-0 vs Buffalo)
2) Toledo (11-7) (1-0 vs WMU)
3) Miami (12-6) (1-1 vs Buffalo)
4) WMU (11-7) (2-1 TB)
5) Buffalo (11-7) (2-2 TB)
6) Akron (11-7) (1-2 TB)
7) Ball State (10-8) (2-1 TB) (1-0 vs Ohio)
8) BG (10-8) (2-1 TB) (1-1 vs Ohio)
9) Kent (10-8) (0-2 TB)
10) NIU (7-11)
11) EMU (5-13)
12) CMU (4-14)
13) [screw 'em] (3-15)

If Akron and Kent win:

1) Miami (12-6) (1-0 vs Toledo)
2) Toledo (11-7) (1-0 vs WMU)
3) Akron (12-6) (1-1 vs Toledo)
4) Ohio (11-7) (2-1 TB)
5) WMU (11-7) (1-1 TB)
6) Kent (11-7) (1-2 TB)
7) BG (10-8) (2-1 TB)
8) Buffalo (10-8) (1-1 TB)
9) Ball State (10-8) (1-2 TB)
10) NIU (7-11)
11) EMU (5-13)
12) CMU (4-14)
13) [screw 'em] (3-15)
Then there were two:
Quote:If Kent wins:

1) Miami (12-6)
2) Toledo (11-7) (1-0 vs WMU)
3) WMU (11-7) (3-2 in TB)
4) Ohio (11-7) (4-3 in TB) (1-0 vs Toledo)
5) Kent (11-7) (4-3 in TB) (0-1 vs Toledo)
6) Akron (11-7) (3-4 in TB)
7) Buffalo (11-7) (3-5 in TB)
8) BG (10-8) (1-0 vs Miami)
9) Ball State (10-8) (1-1 vs Miami)
10) NIU (7-11)
11) EMU (5-13)
12) CMU (4-14)
13) [screw 'em] (3-15)

If  Ohio wins:

1) Ohio (12-6) (2-0 vs Buffalo)
2) Toledo (11-7) (1-0 vs WMU)
3) Miami (12-6) (1-1 vs Buffalo)
4) WMU (11-7) (2-1 TB)
5) Buffalo (11-7) (2-2 TB)
6) Akron (11-7) (1-2 TB)
7) Ball State (10-8) (2-1 TB) (1-0 vs Ohio)
8) BG (10-8) (2-1 TB) (1-1 vs Ohio)
9) Kent (10-8) (0-2 TB)
10) NIU (7-11)
11) EMU (5-13)
12) CMU (4-14)
13) [screw 'em] (3-15)
How would that Ohio/Kent 4/5 work? I think it wouldn't compare their records against Toledo but whatever team wins the 7 loss tiebreaker (UT included) since it would be based on the MAC best regardless of division.
When Akron lost to UB, that sealed a 4th seed for Ohio unless, the beat Kent. 4 seed still a very good finish. Marshall in 1st round CMU at Kent 1st round.
So Toledo is getting a first round bye regardless?
oops...nevermind....forgot that we won the division
I think you guys are right about the #4 Ohio #5 Kent, but not because UT is the #2 seed overall, but because UT is the #3 seed regardless of division, with OU being #2 regardless of division.

MAC Regardless of division
#1 Miami
#2 Ohio (TB 5-3)
#3 Toledo (TB 3-3 (TB 2-0))
#4 WMU (TB 3-3 (TB 1-1))
#5 Kent (TB 4-4 (TB 0-2))
#6 Akron (TB 4-5 (1-1 vs Miami, 2-0 vs Ohio))
#7 Buffalo (TB 4-5 (1-1 vs Miami, 0-2 vs Ohio))

...and so on...
Reference URL's