08-19-2005, 12:05 PM
08-19-2005, 12:24 PM
96 out of 117 - OUCH!
Guest
08-19-2005, 02:15 PM
I'm willing to bet our D will be better than that.
Gambler: want to take my action on that one?
I just don't see this group being burned as much as the other groups of the past. I just think this years team will have more pressure on the qb, thus forcing earlier/shorter throws.
That is how you protect a young D, make them blitz like hell, pin the ears back and go for the young guys at SAm and WILL
Gambler: want to take my action on that one?
I just don't see this group being burned as much as the other groups of the past. I just think this years team will have more pressure on the qb, thus forcing earlier/shorter throws.
That is how you protect a young D, make them blitz like hell, pin the ears back and go for the young guys at SAm and WILL
08-19-2005, 02:31 PM
You can't really complain about the ranking, I mean Lee is out and half the other guys have never played much. I don't think we should have expected much more until the new guys prove they can play.
08-19-2005, 03:20 PM
96? Our defense can't be THAT bad. If that's the case, how did those guys ever make it to a bowl game last year?
I hope the defense uses this ranking as motivation to prove the critics wrong. :eek:
I hope the defense uses this ranking as motivation to prove the critics wrong. :eek:
08-19-2005, 03:30 PM
Huskie_Jon Wrote:96? Our defense can't be THAT bad. If that's the case, how did those guys ever make it to a bowl game last year?They gave up 26 points a game last year and Ball State and UCF were dominating them.
I hope the defense uses this ranking as motivation to prove the critics wrong. :eek:
96 is about as good as it should be.