(01-21-2024 08:48 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 08:20 PM)shere khan Wrote:  All that Trump bashing that has gone on for months here by non prog filth was a waste of time.

You’d better hope not. You instead had better hope that Donald Trump has the political sense to tout this victory as a defining honor in what he knows is going to be a tough campaign to heal a wounded nation; not merely the inevitable coronation of an entitled braggart.

Donald Trump comes to this nomination with a frighteningly small base of support. He will need to convince both establishment Republicans and independents - - both of which, unlike Trumplets, are capable thinking for themselves - - to coalesce behind him. The best first step doing that is via a fair-and-square win during the primaries and caucuses. Notwithstanding his having ducked the debates, Donald Trump now needs to present himself as someone who was tested and prevailed.

This dismissive attitude that comes so naturally to Trumplets will not serve your beloved master well in the general election.

I hope you and the other ‘non Trumplets’ will get behind our nominee and get rid of at least some of the prog filth occupying high office in DC. You may have been right but you have lost the first battle. Time to get in line to win the real battle.

#nevernikki

(01-21-2024 08:48 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 08:20 PM)shere khan Wrote:  All that Trump bashing that has gone on for months here by non prog filth was a waste of time.

You’d better hope not. You instead had better hope that Donald Trump has the political sense to tout this victory as a defining honor in what he knows is going to be a tough campaign to heal a wounded nation; not merely the inevitable coronation of an entitled braggart.

Donald Trump comes to this nomination with a frighteningly small base of support. He will need to convince both establishment Republicans and independents - - both of which, unlike Trumplets, are capable thinking for themselves - - to coalesce behind him. The best first step doing that is via a fair-and-square win during the primaries and caucuses. Notwithstanding his having ducked the debates, Donald Trump now needs to present himself as someone who was tested and prevailed.

This dismissive attitude that comes so naturally to Trumplets will not serve your beloved master well in the general election.

JFC. Get a grip.

Your candidate didn't cut it with voters. Stop crying.
And this is coming from a guy who thinks Trump is perhaps a feel good candidate that probably can't win.

Don't be weird just because you are out numbered. That's life.

(01-21-2024 08:48 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 08:20 PM)shere khan Wrote:  All that Trump bashing that has gone on for months here by non prog filth was a waste of time.

You’d better hope not. You instead had better hope that Donald Trump has the political sense to tout this victory as a defining honor in what he knows is going to be a tough campaign to heal a wounded nation; not merely the inevitable coronation of an entitled braggart.

Donald Trump comes to this nomination with a frighteningly small base of support. He will need to convince both establishment Republicans and independents - - both of which, unlike Trumplets, are capable thinking for themselves - - to coalesce behind him. The best first step doing that is via a fair-and-square win during the primaries and caucuses. Notwithstanding his having ducked the debates, Donald Trump now needs to present himself as someone who was tested and prevailed.

This dismissive attitude that comes so naturally to Trumplets will not serve your beloved master well in the general election.

Reeeeeeeeeeeeee

(01-21-2024 08:48 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 08:20 PM)shere khan Wrote:  All that Trump bashing that has gone on for months here by non prog filth was a waste of time.

You’d better hope not. You instead had better hope that Donald Trump has the political sense to tout this victory as a defining honor in what he knows is going to be a tough campaign to heal a wounded nation; not merely the inevitable coronation of an entitled braggart.

Donald Trump comes to this nomination with a frighteningly small base of support. He will need to convince both establishment Republicans and independents - - both of which, unlike Trumplets, are capable thinking for themselves - - to coalesce behind him. The best first step doing that is via a fair-and-square win during the primaries and caucuses. Notwithstanding his having ducked the debates, Donald Trump now needs to present himself as someone who was tested and prevailed.

This dismissive attitude that comes so naturally to Trumplets will not serve your beloved master well in the general election.

People need to vote for what’s best for the country instead of fixating on personality types, speeches, hats, gaffes, etc.

If Trump has a better platform than Biden then he should win. If Trump doesn’t stay on message and makes this entire campaign about revenge then he will lose.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Come on home Ronbots.



2028

(01-21-2024 03:40 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 03:38 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

He'll be back in 2028 to face off against Gavin Newsom.

Yup.

Maybe a few others. He’ll be fine after his stint at Defense or somewhere.

Lawddy knows we’s gots to get waaaaay too many people out of that incestuous cess pool that is DeeCee. Maybe OMB, or even the take down of the corrupt DEA.

Someone, anyone, tell me which of these alphabet soup agencies are performing well?!?

Kids graduate that can’t spell at 8th grade levels.

Who’s good with that?
Send yo money on in, then.




Y’all figured it out yet?







Suckers

(01-21-2024 03:54 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 03:42 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  He was wasting his time. They ALL were.

Now all we have to remember of the 2024 republican primary season was a bunch of absurdly embarrassing debates.

Smartest thing Trump did was not going to the debates. He took a hit by the candidates, strategists and media over it but he knew there was nothing to gain from them

Well, love him or hate em, he ain dumb

We all know that

Shown yet again

(01-21-2024 07:57 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 04:05 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  DeSantis is a good governor but he simply isn’t a great campaigner. Some politicians are great at both governing and campaigning but most tends to be better at one than the other. There were times it looked like he didn’t want to be there and hobnobbing with voters as though he was in pain and told to do something he didn’t want to do

That was one of DeSantis' better speeches I've heard lately. He has 4 years to work on campaigning.

Finish strong in governing Florida and he'll be OK.

Yup
And he has many more years at the throttle than a lot of us here. Including me

Would love to see him inaugurated in my lifetime.

That and a Vikings SB win.

I fully expect the former before the latter…

Stupid Vikings

Well a lot here will say he is dumb, stupid, moronic, a grifter, imbecile and a felon. And that’s just the ones who call themselves conservatives. SMH.

(01-21-2024 08:54 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  I hope you and the other ‘non Trumplets’ will get behind our nominee and get rid of at least some of the prog filth occupying high office in DC. You may have been right but you have lost the first battle. Time to get in line to win the real battle.

It would take an extraordinarily unexpected move by the Democrats - - Joe Manchin perhaps? - - for me to vote for anyone other than Trump in November.

But that’s not the same as full support. I am not a “big-money donor”, but I do give to my preferred candidate(s) each election cycle. Donald Trump is not my preferred candidate and is not going to be getting my donation.

Who cares, right? The Trumplets will all step up and make up for that. Or will they? I hope I am wrong, but my suspicion is that the only investment that will be made by Trumplets between now and November is a bunch more “Reeeeee” posts. Yup, that’ll help the cause.

And it’s not just money. JR, in another thread, gave a very well-considered post about the importance of being “proactive”. And I have been much more vocal in my daily interactions this year than in the past. But don’t be expecting me to make excuses and daily cover for what you know, WSME, are going to be countless Trump missteps over the coming months. That responsibility falls to the Trumplets. I’m not sure that “Reeeee” is going to be a winning argument when the need for that arises.

Last is your very valid concern about the need to “get rid of at least some of the prog filth occupying high office in DC”. I couldn’t agree more. But do Donald and the Trumplets agree? Because last I checked, his campaigns have always been about him alone. There are no such thing as Trump political coattails.

(01-22-2024 06:00 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 08:54 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  I hope you and the other ‘non Trumplets’ will get behind our nominee and get rid of at least some of the prog filth occupying high office in DC. You may have been right but you have lost the first battle. Time to get in line to win the real battle.

It would take an extraordinarily unexpected move by the Democrats - - Joe Manchin perhaps? - - for me to vote for anyone other than Trump in November.

But that’s not the same as full support. I am not a “big-money donor”, but I do give to my preferred candidate(s) each election cycle. Donald Trump is not my preferred candidate and is not going to be getting my donation.

Who cares, right? The Trumplets will all step up and make up for that. Or will they? I hope I am wrong, but my suspicion is that the only investment that will be made by Trumplets between now and November is a bunch more “Reeeeee” posts. Yup, that’ll help the cause.

And it’s not just money. JR, in another thread, gave a very well-considered post about the importance of being “proactive”. And I have been much more vocal in my daily interactions this year than in the past. But don’t be expecting me to make excuses and daily cover for what you know, WSME, are going to be countless Trump missteps over the coming months. That responsibility falls to the Trumplets. I’m not sure that “Reeeee” is going to be a winning argument when the need for that arises.

Last is your very valid concern about the need to “get rid of at least some of the prog filth occupying high office in DC”. I couldn’t agree more. But do Donald and the Trumplets agree? Because last I checked, his campaigns have always been about him alone. There are no such thing as Trump political coattails.

Joe Manchin is a mealy mouthed weasel.

Its filth vs non filth.

Forget names

Good. Now Trump just needs to finish the job and take down Nikki and at least I don't have to worry about any of the truly nightmarish GOP candidates winning. The only thing that would be worse IMO than the hell of a Nikki presidency would be a Mayor Bootyboy presidency. Hopefully I don't have to live though either of those, but at Petey's age I know he'll be running for president for the rest of my life.

(01-22-2024 09:23 AM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Good. Now Trump just needs to finish the job and take down Nikki and at least I don't have to worry about any of the truly nightmarish GOP candidates winning. The only thing that would be worse IMO than the hell of a Nikki presidency would be a Mayor Bootyboy presidency. Hopefully I don't have to live though either of those, but at Petey's age I know he'll be running for president for the rest of my life.

Nikki is remaining for two reasons.

#1. The money

#2. Hoping along with the democrat filth that Trump gets put in jail or assassinated.

(01-22-2024 06:00 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 08:54 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  I hope you and the other ‘non Trumplets’ will get behind our nominee and get rid of at least some of the prog filth occupying high office in DC. You may have been right but you have lost the first battle. Time to get in line to win the real battle.

It would take an extraordinarily unexpected move by the Democrats - - Joe Manchin perhaps? - - for me to vote for anyone other than Trump in November.

But that’s not the same as full support. I am not a “big-money donor”, but I do give to my preferred candidate(s) each election cycle. Donald Trump is not my preferred candidate and is not going to be getting my donation.

Who cares, right? The Trumplets will all step up and make up for that. Or will they? I hope I am wrong, but my suspicion is that the only investment that will be made by Trumplets between now and November is a bunch more “Reeeeee” posts. Yup, that’ll help the cause.

And it’s not just money. JR, in another thread, gave a very well-considered post about the importance of being “proactive”. And I have been much more vocal in my daily interactions this year than in the past. But don’t be expecting me to make excuses and daily cover for what you know, WSME, are going to be countless Trump missteps over the coming months. That responsibility falls to the Trumplets. I’m not sure that “Reeeee” is going to be a winning argument when the need for that arises.

Last is your very valid concern about the need to “get rid of at least some of the prog filth occupying high office in DC”. I couldn’t agree more. But do Donald and the Trumplets agree? Because last I checked, his campaigns have always been about him alone. There are no such thing as Trump political coattails.

Manchin, the same guy who votes with Biden 88% of the time over Trump? Weird.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(01-22-2024 09:23 AM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Good. Now Trump just needs to finish the job and take down Nikki and at least I don't have to worry about any of the truly nightmarish GOP candidates winning. The only thing that would be worse IMO than the hell of a Nikki presidency would be a Mayor Bootyboy presidency. Hopefully I don't have to live though either of those, but at Petey's age I know he'll be running for president for the rest of my life.

You are the only liberal here with consistent views that don’t factor in personality when making voting choices. It’s impressive


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(01-22-2024 01:01 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(01-22-2024 09:23 AM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Good. Now Trump just needs to finish the job and take down Nikki and at least I don't have to worry about any of the truly nightmarish GOP candidates winning. The only thing that would be worse IMO than the hell of a Nikki presidency would be a Mayor Bootyboy presidency. Hopefully I don't have to live though either of those, but at Petey's age I know he'll be running for president for the rest of my life.

You are the only liberal here with consistent views that don’t factor in personality when making voting choices. It’s impressive


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I ain’t “liberal” and to me I find it embarrassing that basically according to most Dems mean tweets and being an arse make Trump the most evil and awful president ever. From my perspective he’s probably the best GOP president of the last 40 years if I ignore his personality and just look at what he accomplished.

Basically we got a tax cut that every GOP president would have given us and conservative judges and deregulation again would have gotten all of that with a Jeb presidency. Other things we got were no new wars, no attempts to cut Medicare and SS, and a much better posture on trade especially with China. Exact opposite I suspect we’d have gotten with Jeb or that we’d get with Nikki. For me the other thing you get with Trump is the Dems actually opposing bad things the GOP wants to do (also oppose the few good things as well). The Dems IMO would be willing to make some kind of “grand bargain” with Nikki on SS and Medicare that they’d never consider with Trump if he even supported such a thing (thankfully he doesn’t). They’d also be willing to work with her on all sorts of other likely awful “bipartisan” measures, meaning things the elite of both parties agree on. At least with Trump all of that stuff is DOA just out of reflex of oppose everything Trump wants.

(01-22-2024 01:00 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(01-22-2024 06:00 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 08:54 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  I hope you and the other ‘non Trumplets’ will get behind our nominee and get rid of at least some of the prog filth occupying high office in DC. You may have been right but you have lost the first battle. Time to get in line to win the real battle.

It would take an extraordinarily unexpected move by the Democrats - - Joe Manchin perhaps? - - for me to vote for anyone other than Trump in November.

But that’s not the same as full support. I am not a “big-money donor”, but I do give to my preferred candidate(s) each election cycle. Donald Trump is not my preferred candidate and is not going to be getting my donation.

Who cares, right? The Trumplets will all step up and make up for that. Or will they? I hope I am wrong, but my suspicion is that the only investment that will be made by Trumplets between now and November is a bunch more “Reeeeee” posts. Yup, that’ll help the cause.

And it’s not just money. JR, in another thread, gave a very well-considered post about the importance of being “proactive”. And I have been much more vocal in my daily interactions this year than in the past. But don’t be expecting me to make excuses and daily cover for what you know, WSME, are going to be countless Trump missteps over the coming months. That responsibility falls to the Trumplets. I’m not sure that “Reeeee” is going to be a winning argument when the need for that arises.

Last is your very valid concern about the need to “get rid of at least some of the prog filth occupying high office in DC”. I couldn’t agree more. But do Donald and the Trumplets agree? Because last I checked, his campaigns have always been about him alone. There are no such thing as Trump political coattails.

Manchin, the same guy who votes with Biden 88% of the time over Trump? Weird.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The only thing that seems clear in AM's mind is that he doesn't like Trump. He can't write a paragraph without sneaking it in somewhere. His disdain for those on the right with which he disagrees comes out with his childish name calling for those who support the candidate with which he disagrees. What he REALLY seems to want is "more of the same" since none of the others will move the needle in the direction we need. Some, like Nikki want to up the ante on "more of the same." Warmed over Corporatism, I've heard it termed.

(01-22-2024 01:33 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  The only thing that seems clear in AM's mind is that he doesn't like Trump. He can't write a paragraph without sneaking it in somewhere. His disdain for those on the right with which he disagrees comes out with his childish name calling for those who support the candidate with which he disagrees. What he REALLY seems to want is "more of the same" since none of the others will move the needle in the direction we need. Some, like Nikki want to up the ante on "more of the same." Warmed over Corporatism, I've heard it termed.

Yeah, it is pretty awful that I keep referring to people who disagree with me as "progfilth". I need to stop doing that.

(01-22-2024 01:55 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(01-22-2024 01:33 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  The only thing that seems clear in AM's mind is that he doesn't like Trump. He can't write a paragraph without sneaking it in somewhere. His disdain for those on the right with which he disagrees comes out with his childish name calling for those who support the candidate with which he disagrees. What he REALLY seems to want is "more of the same" since none of the others will move the needle in the direction we need. Some, like Nikki want to up the ante on "more of the same." Warmed over Corporatism, I've heard it termed.

Yeah, it is pretty awful that I keep referring to people who disagree with me as "progfilth". I need to stop doing that.

just roll with it, broheim ... the silly season hasn't hit 2nd gear, yet ...

seriously, pay attention how DJT has ratcheted down the bs rhetoric ... ol' dogs can (apparently to date) learn new 'tricks' ... fk'n politics ... I do so hate 'em....

@theDumbestSmartFeller ... #:)