And away we go

https://www.sportico.com/leagues/college...234749110/

"violating federal law by depriving them of equal athletic financial aid and other resources. Those other disproportionate resources, the plaintiffs allege, are the benefits UO athletes receive through Oregon’s NIL collective, Division Street, and Opendorse, which hosts the Ducks’ official NIL marketplace."


I hope they burn it all down.

I thought NILs had no connection to the schools...

(12-01-2023 03:34 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  I thought NILs had no connection to the schools...

They don't. There is no formal connection. That doesn't change the fact that anyone can find an attorney willing to sue anyone over anything these days. Cute how those who profess to be "non-woke conservatives" are quick to jump on this bandwagon if it supports their extreme outlier narratives. More poison from the Tigers old guard.

Quote:Though Division Street is a separate legal entity from Oregon, the plaintiffs are attempting to hold the school responsible for what they say are the disparate opportunities the for-profit entity provides female athletes as compared with the men.

(12-01-2023 03:39 PM)msu35 Wrote:  

(12-01-2023 03:34 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  I thought NILs had no connection to the schools...

They don't. There is no formal connection. That doesn't change the fact that anyone can find an attorney willing to sue anyone over anything these days. Cute how those who profess to be "non-woke conservatives" are quick to jump on this bandwagon if it supports their extreme outlier narratives. More poison from the Tigers old guard.

Quote:Though Division Street is a separate legal entity from Oregon, the plaintiffs are attempting to hold the school responsible for what they say are the disparate opportunities the for-profit entity provides female athletes as compared with the men.

As someone that works in the legal field, I completely agree with your statement.

(12-01-2023 03:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  And away we go

https://www.sportico.com/leagues/college...234749110/

"violating federal law by depriving them of equal athletic financial aid and other resources. Those other disproportionate resources, the plaintiffs allege, are the benefits UO athletes receive through Oregon’s NIL collective, Division Street, and Opendorse, which hosts the Ducks’ official NIL marketplace."


I hope they burn it all down.

Wonderful! I'm assuming it's part of a multi-part effort that will include trans competing against women. This could get interesting.

(12-01-2023 04:16 PM)sfink161 Wrote:  

(12-01-2023 03:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  And away we go

https://www.sportico.com/leagues/college...234749110/

"violating federal law by depriving them of equal athletic financial aid and other resources. Those other disproportionate resources, the plaintiffs allege, are the benefits UO athletes receive through Oregon’s NIL collective, Division Street, and Opendorse, which hosts the Ducks’ official NIL marketplace."


I hope they burn it all down.

Wonderful! I'm assuming it's part of a multi-part effort that will include trans competing against women. This could get interesting.

It’s okay to not have cable news or radio on at all times of the day

(12-01-2023 03:34 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  I thought NILs had no connection to the schools...

No, but the words in the article --> "gender inequality". Females have zero chance at NIL income/money, hence the lawsuit.

(12-01-2023 04:16 PM)sfink161 Wrote:  Wonderful! I'm assuming it's part of a multi-part effort that will include trans competing against women. This could get interesting.

It's absolutely ridiculous that men posing as women are allowed to compete against women in women's sports. Stating that, I'm not specifically against NIL.

(12-01-2023 04:20 PM)sfink161 Wrote:  

(12-01-2023 03:34 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  I thought NILs had no connection to the schools...

No, but the words in the article --> "gender inequality". Females have zero chance at NIL income/money, hence the lawsuit.

Completely disagree.

https://www.on3.com/nil/rankings/player/womens-nil-100/

(12-01-2023 04:34 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(12-01-2023 04:20 PM)sfink161 Wrote:  

(12-01-2023 03:34 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  I thought NILs had no connection to the schools...

No, but the words in the article --> "gender inequality". Females have zero chance at NIL income/money, hence the lawsuit.

Completely disagree.

https://www.on3.com/nil/rankings/player/womens-nil-100/

I think I counted 6 or 7 of the 100 on this list. The rest are males. That isn't a disparity?

https://www.on3.com/nil/rankings/player/nil-100/

(12-01-2023 07:13 PM)sfink161 Wrote:  I think I counted 6 or 7 of the 100 on this list. The rest are males. That isn't a disparity?

https://www.on3.com/nil/rankings/player/nil-100/

Maybe if you use the right link, you'll get better results:

https://www.on3.com/nil/rankings/player/womens-nil-100/

If you're arguing that there is an unfair disparity, are you kidding? What are the ratings and attendance like for women's sports versus men? Have you ever considered that? The people have voted and they overwhelmingly vote to watch the men's products. When paying someone to use their name, image, or likeness; one tends to pay the individuals with the larger followings. That's not discrimination, that's called smart business. Is it any coincidence that the top female NIL recipient is a gymnast?

(12-01-2023 07:15 PM)msu35 Wrote:  

(12-01-2023 07:13 PM)sfink161 Wrote:  I think I counted 6 or 7 of the 100 on this list. The rest are males. That isn't a disparity?

https://www.on3.com/nil/rankings/player/nil-100/

Maybe if you use the right link, you'll get better results:

https://www.on3.com/nil/rankings/player/womens-nil-100/

If you're arguing that there is an unfair disparity, are you kidding? What are the ratings and attendance like for women's sports versus men? Have you ever considered that? The people have voted and they overwhelmingly vote to watch the men's products. When paying someone to use their name, image, or likeness; one tends to pay the individuals with the larger followings. That's not discrimination, that's called smart business. Is it any coincidence that the top female NIL recipient is a gymnast?

LOL, Really? Your comparison is women's only and my link is combined. Who's link is more accurate when doing a comparison. Wow! BTW, Title IX is NOT to take business spreadsheets into account. That's not what Title IX is or does. Title IX has been passed and signed into law.

(12-01-2023 08:01 PM)sfink161 Wrote:  LOL, Really? Your comparison is women's only and my link is combined.

I addressed your concerns and explained why. You can choose to ignore objective reality if you prefer. Which gender-specific programs generate more revenue? Which gender-specific programs have the highest attendance? Which gender-specific programs have the highest viewership?

Quote:Who's link is more accurate when doing a comparison.

Did you really need a link to determine something that anyone would already know? I'll give you a head start on the answer to one the above questions, to further elucidate the factors. I assure you that the answer to the remaining questions will overwhelmingly favor men's sports.

2021-22 Net Attendance for D-I

Men: 23,789,492
Women: 6,927,901

How about professional leagues? Let's look at revenue.

NBA: $10,000,000,000
WNBA: $60,000,000

(12-01-2023 08:01 PM)sfink161 Wrote:  Wow! BTW, Title IX is NOT to take business spreadsheets into account. That's not what Title IX is or does. Title IX has been passed and signed into law.

Wow! Please explain how Title IX is even applicable to a private organization with the purpose of paying individuals to use their name, image, or likeliness? When has an NIL initiative ever been a school, education program, or received federal funds?

Quote:It prohibits sex-based discrimination in any school or any other education program that receives funding from the federal government. This is Public Law No. 92‑318, 86 Stat. 235, codified at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688.

(12-01-2023 03:49 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(12-01-2023 03:39 PM)msu35 Wrote:  

(12-01-2023 03:34 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  I thought NILs had no connection to the schools...

They don't. There is no formal connection. That doesn't change the fact that anyone can find an attorney willing to sue anyone over anything these days. Cute how those who profess to be "non-woke conservatives" are quick to jump on this bandwagon if it supports their extreme outlier narratives. More poison from the Tigers old guard.

Quote:Though Division Street is a separate legal entity from Oregon, the plaintiffs are attempting to hold the school responsible for what they say are the disparate opportunities the for-profit entity provides female athletes as compared with the men.

As someone that works in the legal field, I completely agree with your statement.

Anything that puts this whole scam in the public eye is good.

Women deserve NIL equity.



Good luck chicks. Go get em



Some are more equal than others

(12-01-2023 08:31 PM)msu35 Wrote:  Tangent of unrelated numbers.

I think I remember now, you ignore the main part of post you are responding to and go on unrelated tangents. This is about Title IX, nothing else. READ IT!!!!!

(12-01-2023 08:33 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Anything that puts this whole scam in the public eye is good.

Women deserve NIL equity.



Good luck chicks. Go get em



Some are more equal than others

Couldn't agree more, and love your example you provide.

(12-01-2023 08:50 PM)sfink161 Wrote:  

(12-01-2023 08:31 PM)msu35 Wrote:  Tangent of unrelated numbers.

I think I remember now, you ignore the main part of post you are responding to and go on unrelated tangents. This is about Title IX, nothing else. READ IT!!!!!

Take the "L" and accept that you're wrong. Pretending that you forgot how to read doesn't help your case, and I'm still waiting for your answer.

(12-01-2023 08:31 PM)msu35 Wrote:  Wow! Please explain how Title IX is even applicable to a private organization with the purpose of paying individuals to use their name, image, or likeliness? When has an NIL initiative ever been a school, education program, or received federal funds?

Quote:It prohibits sex-based discrimination in any school or any other education program that receives funding from the federal government. This is Public Law No. 92‑318, 86 Stat. 235, codified at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688.

(12-01-2023 08:55 PM)sfink161 Wrote:  

(12-01-2023 08:33 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Anything that puts this whole scam in the public eye is good.

Women deserve NIL equity.



Good luck chicks. Go get em

Some are more equal than others

Couldn't agree more, and love your example you provide.

The OP is as anti-woke as one can get, and the hilarious part is that you don't even realize that he's trolling you. He's anti-NIL and couldn't care less about "equality."

(12-01-2023 09:05 PM)msu35 Wrote:  

(12-01-2023 08:55 PM)sfink161 Wrote:  

(12-01-2023 08:33 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Anything that puts this whole scam in the public eye is good.

Women deserve NIL equity.



Good luck chicks. Go get em

Some are more equal than others

Couldn't agree more, and love your example you provide.

The OP is as anti-woke as one can get, and the hilarious part is that you don't even realize that he's trolling you. He's anti-NIL and couldn't care less about "equality."

You're an IDIOT on both replies, so I'll just MUTE you for now. I don't need to read stupid posters posts.

(12-01-2023 09:16 PM)sfink161 Wrote:  You're an IDIOT on both replies, so I'll just MUTE you for now. I don't need to read stupid posters posts.

Didn't think you could demonstrate how Title IX was remotely applicable. Typical. When faced with factual information, has a complete meltdown.