(09-22-2023 07:33 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Personally, i will say they do have Russel for having sex with a 16 year old minor, while he was an adult. (Which if true he should face the music for). But that's the only thing IMO they have him on.

I do not believe he raped anyone as suggested, as I believe they were all consensual... and that these women are part of the attempt "#metoo" culture.

WHOA. Hold up there. Isn't sex with a minor by the very definition non-consensual, since you know, they are a minor?

That's statutory rape, right? Because as minors they can't give consent?

(09-22-2023 08:36 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-22-2023 07:33 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Personally, i will say they do have Russel for having sex with a 16 year old minor, while he was an adult. (Which if true he should face the music for). But that's the only thing IMO they have him on.

I do not believe he raped anyone as suggested, as I believe they were all consensual... and that these women are part of the attempt "#metoo" culture.

WHOA. Hold up there. Isn't sex with a minor by the very definition non-consensual, since you know, they are a minor?

That's statutory rape, right? Because as minors they can't give consent?

The age of emancipation in England is 16. Having lived there, kids tend to grow up quicker than here in the US. You graduate from our equivalent to high school at 16 and either go into university or learn a trade. They move out of their parents home and get a flat (an apartment). They can buy beer and cigarettes.

I believe a 30 year man having sec with a 16 year old is morally wrong, but it is not illegal in England.

(09-22-2023 08:49 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(09-22-2023 08:36 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-22-2023 07:33 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Personally, i will say they do have Russel for having sex with a 16 year old minor, while he was an adult. (Which if true he should face the music for). But that's the only thing IMO they have him on.

I do not believe he raped anyone as suggested, as I believe they were all consensual... and that these women are part of the attempt "#metoo" culture.

WHOA. Hold up there. Isn't sex with a minor by the very definition non-consensual, since you know, they are a minor?

That's statutory rape, right? Because as minors they can't give consent?

The age of emancipation in England is 16. Having lived there, kids tend to grow up quicker than here in the US. You graduate from our equivalent to high school at 16 and either go into university or learn a trade. They move out of their parents home and get a flat (an apartment). They can buy beer and cigarettes.

I believe a 30 year man having sec with a 16 year old is morally wrong, but it is not illegal in England.

Okay, thanks for the clarification.

(09-22-2023 08:49 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(09-22-2023 08:36 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-22-2023 07:33 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Personally, i will say they do have Russel for having sex with a 16 year old minor, while he was an adult. (Which if true he should face the music for). But that's the only thing IMO they have him on.

I do not believe he raped anyone as suggested, as I believe they were all consensual... and that these women are part of the attempt "#metoo" culture.

WHOA. Hold up there. Isn't sex with a minor by the very definition non-consensual, since you know, they are a minor?

That's statutory rape, right? Because as minors they can't give consent?

The age of emancipation in England is 16. Having lived there, kids tend to grow up quicker than here in the US. You graduate from our equivalent to high school at 16 and either go into university or learn a trade. They move out of their parents home and get a flat (an apartment). They can buy beer and cigarettes.

I believe a 30 year man having sec with a 16 year old is morally wrong, but it is not illegal in England.

Times have changed, my great great grandmother was married at 13. It wasn't unusual for the times.

(09-21-2023 08:31 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(09-21-2023 05:32 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(09-21-2023 05:09 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  This is the Salem Witch Trials. There is no evidence of what he's accused of. None. His accuser has not even revealed their identity. They're still cancelling him.

yep ... it's the wild wild wild west if ya wanna play famous on the internutz ... no rules and gun 'em down unless you play along with their narrative...

I simply say, "no, thank you and fockall!"

Accusers. There are 4. And for a guy who has said he was so drugged out for years of his life that his does not remember anything, but he “remembers” not doing these things.

Name them

(09-22-2023 08:36 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-22-2023 07:33 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Personally, i will say they do have Russel for having sex with a 16 year old minor, while he was an adult. (Which if true he should face the music for). But that's the only thing IMO they have him on.

I do not believe he raped anyone as suggested, as I believe they were all consensual... and that these women are part of the attempt "#metoo" culture.

WHOA. Hold up there. Isn't sex with a minor by the very definition non-consensual, since you know, they are a minor?

That's statutory rape, right? Because as minors they can't give consent?

There are more than a few states in this country where 16 IS the age of consent.

(09-22-2023 04:19 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(09-22-2023 03:32 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  Well the local scumbags have chimed in with their takes.

Yeah they really should not be defending the guy.

Not defending him. Defending what USED to be the concept of justice in this country.

(09-22-2023 09:21 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(09-22-2023 08:36 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-22-2023 07:33 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Personally, i will say they do have Russel for having sex with a 16 year old minor, while he was an adult. (Which if true he should face the music for). But that's the only thing IMO they have him on.

I do not believe he raped anyone as suggested, as I believe they were all consensual... and that these women are part of the attempt "#metoo" culture.

WHOA. Hold up there. Isn't sex with a minor by the very definition non-consensual, since you know, they are a minor?

That's statutory rape, right? Because as minors they can't give consent?

There are more than a few states in this country where 16 IS the age of consent.

I'm sure there are. Just as there are more than a few where it isn't.

Bottom line, would you want your 16 year old daughter having sex with a grown ass man nearly twice her age?

(09-22-2023 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I'm sure there are. Just as there are more than a few where it isn't.

Bottom line, would you want your 16 year old daughter having sex with a grown ass man nearly twice her age?

Of course not, but of course that isn't the point. He isn't being cancelled for that. Nice deflection there commie tommie.

(09-21-2023 08:41 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

(09-21-2023 08:31 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(09-21-2023 05:32 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(09-21-2023 05:09 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  This is the Salem Witch Trials. There is no evidence of what he's accused of. None. His accuser has not even revealed their identity. They're still cancelling him.

yep ... it's the wild wild wild west if ya wanna play famous on the internutz ... no rules and gun 'em down unless you play along with their narrative...

I simply say, "no, thank you and fockall!"

Accusers. There are 4. And for a guy who has said he was so drugged out for years of his life that his does not remember anything, but he “remembers” not doing these things.

There are no such things as coincidences — all of these cancel culture attacks and past revelations happens to vocal people as soon as one questions Big Pharma or censorship or big tech

He canceled himself out a long time ago before the cancel culture hit him this time. He have always been in trouble since 2010. He was married to Katy Perry at one time. His movies kept bombing as well. I am not surprise that he can't keep his manhood in his pants. I do wonder why women see anything in him? He looks like someone took an ugly stick and hit him in the head so many times.

(09-22-2023 09:34 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-21-2023 08:41 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

(09-21-2023 08:31 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(09-21-2023 05:32 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(09-21-2023 05:09 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  This is the Salem Witch Trials. There is no evidence of what he's accused of. None. His accuser has not even revealed their identity. They're still cancelling him.

yep ... it's the wild wild wild west if ya wanna play famous on the internutz ... no rules and gun 'em down unless you play along with their narrative...

I simply say, "no, thank you and fockall!"

Accusers. There are 4. And for a guy who has said he was so drugged out for years of his life that his does not remember anything, but he “remembers” not doing these things.

There are no such things as coincidences — all of these cancel culture attacks and past revelations happens to vocal people as soon as one questions Big Pharma or censorship or big tech

He canceled himself out a long time ago before the cancel culture hit him this time. He have always been in trouble since 2010. He was married to Katy Perry at one time. His movies kept bombing as well. I am not surprise that he can't keep his manhood in his pants. I do wonder why women see anything in him? He looks like someone took an ugly stick and hit him in the head so many times.

Seems like you simply don't like the person. Is that reason to "cancel" someone? I see nothing in what you wrote that warrants anything, especially "being cancelled". Plenty of people make terrible movies, plenty of people get divorced. Face it, this is political. Nothing else explains it, especially if the man has not been charged with anything illegal.

I am not defending Brand. I don't give two chits about him. Like I said above, I'm defending justice. What they're doing to him is not justice. When this is all over, IF he is found innocent of all this, do you really think he will ever have a normal life again? Of course he won't, nothing will ever be said about his innocence, all the prog filth will have already moved on to the next poor schmuck.

This is what you people do.

(09-22-2023 09:40 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I am not defending Brand. I don't give two chits about him. Like I said above, I'm defending justice. What they're doing to him is not justice. When this is all over, IF he is found innocent of all this, do you really think he will ever have a normal life again? Of course he won't, nothing will ever be said about his innocence, all the prog filth will have already moved on to the next poor schmuck.

I agree, I've never liked the dude. But what I think makes no difference. If he's proven innocent, all the yahoos trying to cancel him will be no where to be seen. They'll all be on to find their next victim.

(09-22-2023 09:38 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(09-22-2023 09:34 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-21-2023 08:41 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

(09-21-2023 08:31 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(09-21-2023 05:32 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  yep ... it's the wild wild wild west if ya wanna play famous on the internutz ... no rules and gun 'em down unless you play along with their narrative...

I simply say, "no, thank you and fockall!"

Accusers. There are 4. And for a guy who has said he was so drugged out for years of his life that his does not remember anything, but he “remembers” not doing these things.

There are no such things as coincidences — all of these cancel culture attacks and past revelations happens to vocal people as soon as one questions Big Pharma or censorship or big tech

He canceled himself out a long time ago before the cancel culture hit him this time. He have always been in trouble since 2010. He was married to Katy Perry at one time. His movies kept bombing as well. I am not surprise that he can't keep his manhood in his pants. I do wonder why women see anything in him? He looks like someone took an ugly stick and hit him in the head so many times.

Seems like you simply don't like the person. Is that reason to "cancel" someone? I see nothing in what you wrote that warrants anything, especially "being cancelled". Plenty of people make terrible movies, plenty of people get divorced. Face it, this is political. Nothing else explains it, especially if the man has not been charged with anything illegal.

This is what Brand's problems are.

Quote:Over the course of his career, Brand has been the subject of frequent media coverage and controversy for issues such as his promiscuity, drug use, political views, provocative behaviour at various award ceremonies, his dismissal from MTV, and his resignation from the BBC. He has incorporated many of his controversial public acts into his comedic material.

He had issues in the past with yes, sex with women through the years, drug use, left leaning political views, his behavioral in public, and many more. He also destroyed the legacy of his role in the beloved Dudley Moore's role as Arthur. He is not even funny.

Brand Deported From Japan For His Criminal Record


That article came out in 2011.

Quote:The reason for the deportation? Allegedly, a 10-year-old criminal case, reports the Examiner.

Brand is no stranger to scrapes with the law. He has been arrested multiple times in the past, the last one for allegedly attacking a paparazzi at the Los Angeles airport, reports Reuters.

However, despite the awkwardness that must have accompanied getting snatched up by Japanese police, Brand seems to be handling the situation with some humor.

Brand tweeted several times during his stint in the big house, reports CBS News:

"Planning escape from Japanese custody. It's bloody hard to dig a tunnel with a chopstick."

Now, the chopsticks comment part made him look to be very stupid.

(09-22-2023 09:47 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  He had issues in the past with yes, sex with women through the years, drug use, left leaning political views, his behavioral in public, and many more. He also destroyed the legacy of his role in the beloved Dudley Moore's role as Arthur. He is not even funny.

Again, this has NOTHING to do with what's going on right now.

(09-22-2023 09:47 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-22-2023 09:38 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(09-22-2023 09:34 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-21-2023 08:41 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

(09-21-2023 08:31 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Accusers. There are 4. And for a guy who has said he was so drugged out for years of his life that his does not remember anything, but he “remembers” not doing these things.

There are no such things as coincidences — all of these cancel culture attacks and past revelations happens to vocal people as soon as one questions Big Pharma or censorship or big tech

He canceled himself out a long time ago before the cancel culture hit him this time. He have always been in trouble since 2010. He was married to Katy Perry at one time. His movies kept bombing as well. I am not surprise that he can't keep his manhood in his pants. I do wonder why women see anything in him? He looks like someone took an ugly stick and hit him in the head so many times.

Seems like you simply don't like the person. Is that reason to "cancel" someone? I see nothing in what you wrote that warrants anything, especially "being cancelled". Plenty of people make terrible movies, plenty of people get divorced. Face it, this is political. Nothing else explains it, especially if the man has not been charged with anything illegal.

This is what Brand's problems are.

Quote:Over the course of his career, Brand has been the subject of frequent media coverage and controversy for issues such as his promiscuity, drug use, political views, provocative behaviour at various award ceremonies, his dismissal from MTV, and his resignation from the BBC. He has incorporated many of his controversial public acts into his comedic material.

He had issues in the past with yes, sex with women through the years, drug use, left leaning political views, his behavioral in public, and many more. He also destroyed the legacy of his role in the beloved Dudley Moore's role as Arthur. He is not even funny.

You just described every Rock Star and Andrew Dice Clay.

(09-22-2023 09:43 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(09-22-2023 09:40 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I am not defending Brand. I don't give two chits about him. Like I said above, I'm defending justice. What they're doing to him is not justice. When this is all over, IF he is found innocent of all this, do you really think he will ever have a normal life again? Of course he won't, nothing will ever be said about his innocence, all the prog filth will have already moved on to the next poor schmuck.

I agree, I've never liked the dude. But what I think makes no difference. If he's proven innocent, all the yahoos trying to cancel him will be no where to be seen. They'll all be on to find their next victim.

Same here, in fact I have always disliked him.

But the way this is going down is just wrong and the way his government is getting involved in silencing him is wrong.

As has already been stated, they are going after him because he has devolved a big following in recent years on social media for his positions on Big Pharma, covid, lockdowns, woke ideologies and censorship. He has gone after the totalitarian left really hard since 2020.

And to his credit, its does appear that he has changed his behavior quite a bit the last few years and been real open about his past mistakes and foolish lifestyle.