(04-04-2023 06:38 PM)schmolik Wrote: (04-04-2023 04:27 PM)quo vadis Wrote: The ACC is where Big East football goes to die, LOL. :)
And Big East men's basketball as well. Look at Boston College, Syracuse, Pittsburgh, Notre Dame, and Louisville in the ACC. Syracuse did make a Final Four as an ACC member but as a #10 seed and they've been pretty much irrelevant recently.
I'm late to the thread, but BC jumped at the ACC offer because they knew if they didn't get into the ACC early or the ACC decided not to expand, the next time the ACC thought about 12, they'd ask UConn instead of them.
The ACC targeted Miami (for FB), BC and Syracuse (for more NE media exposure). The Virginia board of regents told UVA they couldn't vote for expansion that didn't include Va Tech. Syracuse was on the fence and Va Tech was better at football anyway, so the ACC adjusted. But when they held the vote, the NC State chancellor had done due diligence on BC, Miami and Syracuse, but had been on vacation during the VT sub. So she abstained from the voting. Because of the abstention, VT and Miami had 6+ votes, but BC had 5 of 8 instead of 6 of 9. The ACC met again and voted to invite BC, but they missed the Big East withdraw cutoff and BC had a lameduck last Big East season.
As for the basketball competitiveness... conference play is a zero sum game. Of course the team records are worse, they're worse for EVERYONE now that there's 15 teams in the league instead of 9 or 12.
In the 12-team ACC, going 9-7 in league play, 23-9 overall, NCAA tournament, 7 seed.
In the 15-team ACC, going 10-8 in league play, 20-14 overall, NCAA tournament, 10 seed.
That's just the nature of how conferences work.