I find her reliance on the wind and ghosts to be more believable than James Comey's assertion that it was inappropriate to try Hillary Clinton for treason based on her use of a non-secure server to handle classified information. That is not to say that I do not find the former unbelievable, but rather because I find the latter absolutely unfathomable.

MSNBC? Really?

I thought we were supposed to be inclusive and tolerant of other people's views.

You know, like how we're supposed to accept that people with d!cks are women, right?

(03-11-2023 08:32 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I find her reliance on the wind and ghosts to be more believable than James Comey's assertion that it was inappropriate to try Hillary Clinton for treason based on her use of a non-secure server to handle classified information. That is not to say that I do not find the former unbelievable, but rather because I find the latter absolutely unfathomable.

I’m sure you do…

(03-11-2023 08:57 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  MSNBC? Really?

The filth stood her up to knock her down


Muh most votes ever. Idiots.

(03-11-2023 08:32 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I find her reliance on the wind and ghosts to be more believable than James Comey's assertion that it was inappropriate to try Hillary Clinton for treason based on her use of a non-secure server to handle classified information. That is not to say that I do not find the former unbelievable, but rather because I find the latter absolutely unfathomable.

Yeah, I was thinking Cactus and wind is a whole lot more reliable than the stuff the MSM and Democrats have been relying on the last 6 years!

(03-11-2023 08:57 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  MSNBC? Really?

For real, a cactus artist is probably more reliable than MSNBC.

Why do you set yourself up for ridicule by giving us valid reasons to ridicule you?

(03-11-2023 11:56 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Why do you set yourself up for ridicule by giving us valid reasons to ridicule you?

Anything not coming from Redstate or Breitbart is going to be ridiculed with this crew, but it doesn’t change the fact that Fox’s source for the false attacks on election integrity & dominion were unconfirmed emails from a wind talking lady selling cactus art: Sadly, she is representative of the current base of the banana republican wing of the GOP.

(03-11-2023 12:14 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(03-11-2023 11:56 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Why do you set yourself up for ridicule by giving us valid reasons to ridicule you?

Anything not coming from Redstate or Breitbart is going to be ridiculed with this crew, but it doesn’t change the fact that Fox’s source for the false attacks on election integrity & dominion were unconfirmed emails from a wind talking lady selling cactus art: Sadly, she is representative of the current base of the banana republican wing of the GOP.

Yet you look at sources that lied to you over and over and over regarding so many topics.

Did you believe the Hunter laptop was Russian misinformation?
Did you believe Trump was working with Putin?

Which MSM sources ran with those narratives?

The idea that the US army raided Dominion servers in Germany was always ridiculous.

But no more ridiculous than Kavanaugh rape parties and DJT colluding with Putin in the 2016 election. And a lot lower % of Republicans believed the Dominion nonsense than Democrats believed the rape party or collusion nonsense.