(11-22-2022 01:20 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 12:45 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 12:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 11:59 AM)b2b Wrote:  Come on guys. Don't question emptywheel.net

Laugh all you want. She knows her ****. Certainly more than that demoted piss tester.

Also, she was one of the first anywhere to cry foul on the Steele Dossier.

Yet you never believed her....

post the link to that post if you come back with, of course I did. Since she was one of the "first" that must have been early on ....2016

Dude, you don't know WTF you're talking about.

Here's one example from March of 2017. Feel free to go combing for anything earlier.

Quote:Nevertheless, the possibility that FBI may have used information from a Democratically paid oppo researcher does raise questions of propriety. Add in the discrepancies in these three reports about whether FBI did pay for Steele’s work, and Grassley is right to raise questions.

THE FEEDBACK LOOP IN CHRISTOPHER STEELE’S DOSSIER

Anybody with half a brain questioned the legitimacy of the Steele Dossier the day it was released. That's not exactly some kind of ground breaking news there, Tom.

Apologies, I should have said from those on the left. And yes, a big chunk of them and the media, as well as elected officials read way too much into it from the start.

(11-22-2022 01:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:21 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 12:45 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 12:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Laugh all you want. She knows her ****. Certainly more than that demoted piss tester.

Also, she was one of the first anywhere to cry foul on the Steele Dossier.

Yet you never believed her....

post the link to that post if you come back with, of course I did. Since she was one of the "first" that must have been early on ....2016

Dude, you don't know WTF you're talking about.

Here's one example from March of 2017. Feel free to go combing for anything earlier.

Quote:Nevertheless, the possibility that FBI may have used information from a Democratically paid oppo researcher does raise questions of propriety. Add in the discrepancies in these three reports about whether FBI did pay for Steele’s work, and Grassley is right to raise questions.

THE FEEDBACK LOOP IN CHRISTOPHER STEELE’S DOSSIER

Maybe I wasn't clear enough when I said

"Yet you never believed her....

post the link to that post if you come back with, of course I did"

I dont play your game where I let you control and change the question I asked. I never said anything about if this person did or didn't......

post the damn link where you agreed with her that Russia Russia Russia was not real in 2017. Back it up with the link.

Dude, I was not even aware of her work back then, much less following her on twitter.

So let me see if I have this correct.....


one day you just happened to see something you liked and then researched her post back to 2017 to see she believed Russia Russia Russia was bull crap? How else would you find out she was....

"she was one of the first anywhere to cry foul on the Steele Dossier"


Not buying that load of crap and you can forget about coming back with your tough boy internet post of "Dude! you so and so...." Dont play those games or your bullshite, like others do.

Lets do this the direct way.....

post the link to the post where you first commented on the Steele Dossier being fake or bull crap?

(11-22-2022 01:56 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:21 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 12:45 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  Yet you never believed her....

post the link to that post if you come back with, of course I did. Since she was one of the "first" that must have been early on ....2016

Dude, you don't know WTF you're talking about.

Here's one example from March of 2017. Feel free to go combing for anything earlier.

Quote:Nevertheless, the possibility that FBI may have used information from a Democratically paid oppo researcher does raise questions of propriety. Add in the discrepancies in these three reports about whether FBI did pay for Steele’s work, and Grassley is right to raise questions.

THE FEEDBACK LOOP IN CHRISTOPHER STEELE’S DOSSIER

Maybe I wasn't clear enough when I said

"Yet you never believed her....

post the link to that post if you come back with, of course I did"

I dont play your game where I let you control and change the question I asked. I never said anything about if this person did or didn't......

post the damn link where you agreed with her that Russia Russia Russia was not real in 2017. Back it up with the link.

Dude, I was not even aware of her work back then, much less following her on twitter.

So let me see if I have this correct.....


one day you just happened to see something you liked and then researched her post back to 2017 to see she believed Russia Russia Russia was bull crap? How else would you find out she was....

"she was one of the first anywhere to cry foul on the Steele Dossier"


Not buying that load of crap and you can forget about coming back with your tough boy internet post of "Dude! you so and so...." Dont play those games or your bullshite, like others do.

Lets do this the direct way.....

post the link to the post where you first commented on the Steele Dossier being fake or bull crap?

I just found a thread (in 2018) where Tom was touting the Steele Dossier as legit. And, now he says this.

The man is a phony and a liar.

(11-22-2022 01:56 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:21 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 12:45 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  Yet you never believed her....

post the link to that post if you come back with, of course I did. Since she was one of the "first" that must have been early on ....2016

Dude, you don't know WTF you're talking about.

Here's one example from March of 2017. Feel free to go combing for anything earlier.

Quote:Nevertheless, the possibility that FBI may have used information from a Democratically paid oppo researcher does raise questions of propriety. Add in the discrepancies in these three reports about whether FBI did pay for Steele’s work, and Grassley is right to raise questions.

THE FEEDBACK LOOP IN CHRISTOPHER STEELE’S DOSSIER

Maybe I wasn't clear enough when I said

"Yet you never believed her....

post the link to that post if you come back with, of course I did"

I dont play your game where I let you control and change the question I asked. I never said anything about if this person did or didn't......

post the damn link where you agreed with her that Russia Russia Russia was not real in 2017. Back it up with the link.

Dude, I was not even aware of her work back then, much less following her on twitter.

So let me see if I have this correct.....


one day you just happened to see something you liked and then researched her post back to 2017 to see she believed Russia Russia Russia was bull crap? How else would you find out she was....

"she was one of the first anywhere to cry foul on the Steele Dossier"


Not buying that load of crap and you can forget about coming back with your tough boy internet post of "Dude! you so and so...." Dont play those games or your bullshite, like others do.

Lets do this the direct way.....

post the link to the post where you first commented on the Steele Dossier being fake or bull crap?

I've followed and read her work for probably 2-3 years. And I'm going by her word on Steele and she's linked back to her early comments on it many times over the years. I merely went to her website and searched her archives for the story I linked above. I know there's several others.

And no, I don't care to go back and try to find all my comments on the Steele Dossier.

Lastly, I don't give a **** whether you believe or not what she said on the matter. I know the truth here since I do follow her now.

(11-22-2022 02:22 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:56 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:21 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Dude, you don't know WTF you're talking about.

Here's one example from March of 2017. Feel free to go combing for anything earlier.
THE FEEDBACK LOOP IN CHRISTOPHER STEELE’S DOSSIER

Maybe I wasn't clear enough when I said

"Yet you never believed her....

post the link to that post if you come back with, of course I did"

I dont play your game where I let you control and change the question I asked. I never said anything about if this person did or didn't......

post the damn link where you agreed with her that Russia Russia Russia was not real in 2017. Back it up with the link.

Dude, I was not even aware of her work back then, much less following her on twitter.

So let me see if I have this correct.....


one day you just happened to see something you liked and then researched her post back to 2017 to see she believed Russia Russia Russia was bull crap? How else would you find out she was....

"she was one of the first anywhere to cry foul on the Steele Dossier"


Not buying that load of crap and you can forget about coming back with your tough boy internet post of "Dude! you so and so...." Dont play those games or your bullshite, like others do.

Lets do this the direct way.....

post the link to the post where you first commented on the Steele Dossier being fake or bull crap?

I just found a thread (in 2018) where Tom was touting the Steele Dossier as legit. And, now he says this.

The man is a phony and a liar.

Link? And where have I ever supposedly claimed that I never believed anything about or in the Dossier?

(11-22-2022 02:28 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 02:22 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:56 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:21 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  Maybe I wasn't clear enough when I said

"Yet you never believed her....

post the link to that post if you come back with, of course I did"

I dont play your game where I let you control and change the question I asked. I never said anything about if this person did or didn't......

post the damn link where you agreed with her that Russia Russia Russia was not real in 2017. Back it up with the link.

Dude, I was not even aware of her work back then, much less following her on twitter.

So let me see if I have this correct.....


one day you just happened to see something you liked and then researched her post back to 2017 to see she believed Russia Russia Russia was bull crap? How else would you find out she was....

"she was one of the first anywhere to cry foul on the Steele Dossier"


Not buying that load of crap and you can forget about coming back with your tough boy internet post of "Dude! you so and so...." Dont play those games or your bullshite, like others do.

Lets do this the direct way.....

post the link to the post where you first commented on the Steele Dossier being fake or bull crap?

I just found a thread (in 2018) where Tom was touting the Steele Dossier as legit. And, now he says this.

The man is a phony and a liar.

Link? And where have I ever supposedly claimed that I never believed anything about or in the Dossier?

There are also several other threads, as well.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-848043-page-7.html

(11-22-2022 02:34 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 02:28 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 02:22 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:56 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Dude, I was not even aware of her work back then, much less following her on twitter.

So let me see if I have this correct.....


one day you just happened to see something you liked and then researched her post back to 2017 to see she believed Russia Russia Russia was bull crap? How else would you find out she was....

"she was one of the first anywhere to cry foul on the Steele Dossier"


Not buying that load of crap and you can forget about coming back with your tough boy internet post of "Dude! you so and so...." Dont play those games or your bullshite, like others do.

Lets do this the direct way.....

post the link to the post where you first commented on the Steele Dossier being fake or bull crap?

I just found a thread (in 2018) where Tom was touting the Steele Dossier as legit. And, now he says this.

The man is a phony and a liar.

Link? And where have I ever supposedly claimed that I never believed anything about or in the Dossier?

There are also several other threads, as well.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-848043-page-7.html

Wow...you're right...my comments in that thread were...oh...wait...basically nothing.

Again, I never made any claims that I never thought the Steele Dossier was legit. IIRC, I only posted that it some things in it were potentially true and that yeah, a few articles I posted stated that they were able to verify a few things in it.

Regardless, I came to the conclusion many years ago that even if trump did collude with Russia, it's not even a damned crime!

The media isn’t “behind” on the news story, they’re trying to control the arc of how it is covered. If more voters knew about the possible quid pro quo/conflict of interest in 2020, it may have swung enough voters in the Midwest to vote Trump.

(11-22-2022 02:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 02:34 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 02:28 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 02:22 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 01:56 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  So let me see if I have this correct.....


one day you just happened to see something you liked and then researched her post back to 2017 to see she believed Russia Russia Russia was bull crap? How else would you find out she was....

"she was one of the first anywhere to cry foul on the Steele Dossier"


Not buying that load of crap and you can forget about coming back with your tough boy internet post of "Dude! you so and so...." Dont play those games or your bullshite, like others do.

Lets do this the direct way.....

post the link to the post where you first commented on the Steele Dossier being fake or bull crap?

I just found a thread (in 2018) where Tom was touting the Steele Dossier as legit. And, now he says this.

The man is a phony and a liar.

Link? And where have I ever supposedly claimed that I never believed anything about or in the Dossier?

There are also several other threads, as well.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-848043-page-7.html

Wow...you're right...my comments in that thread were...oh...wait...basically nothing.

Again, I never made any claims that I never thought the Steele Dossier was legit. IIRC, I only posted that it some things in it were potentially true and that yeah, a few articles I posted stated that they were able to verify a few things in it.

Regardless, I came to the conclusion many years ago that even if trump did collude with Russia, it's not even a damned crime!

Deflect all you want. We know better.

Believed in the dossier for years, just like you believed that the MarALago raid was not a political stunt, that Paul Pelosi's attacker was a Trumper, that several police officers were killed on January 6th, Hunter's laptop is nothing, FTX is a hoax, hands up/don't shoot, and on and on and on.

I no longer think you're hoodwinked. It's obvious you'll say/believe ANYTHING to help the blue team. Truth be damned.

How many years will it take the MSM to admit Jan 6th was nothing more than an unruly unguided tour of the capitol building?

(11-22-2022 03:48 PM)RuckleSt Wrote:  How many years will it take the MSM to admit Jan 6th was nothing more than an unruly unguided tour of the capitol building?

Seeing as "Threat to Our Democracy" is their #1 narrative----its gunna be a while before they admit the truth on that one.

(11-22-2022 03:51 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 03:48 PM)RuckleSt Wrote:  How many years will it take the MSM to admit Jan 6th was nothing more than an unruly unguided tour of the capitol building?

Seeing as "Threat to Our Democracy" is their #1 narrative----its gunna be a while before they admit the truth on that one.

We're past the point of admitting wrongs. Especially from the media, as they are no longer media, but simply the propaganda wing of the dem party. Journalism is all but dead.

(11-22-2022 03:56 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 03:51 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 03:48 PM)RuckleSt Wrote:  How many years will it take the MSM to admit Jan 6th was nothing more than an unruly unguided tour of the capitol building?

Seeing as "Threat to Our Democracy" is their #1 narrative----its gunna be a while before they admit the truth on that one.

We're past the point of admitting wrongs. Especially from the media, as they are no longer media, but simply the propaganda wing of the dem party. Journalism is all but dead.

I'm still trying to figgle out what took y'all so dayum long...

call in to the Jimmy Failla (he's a pacifist/commie tommie/former taxi driver) show and point blank ask, "who signs your paycheck, son?!"

that'll shut 'em up, quick-like...

@sigLines5+6

CBS is on it, I tell you. Not much gets by them.

(11-22-2022 03:31 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  The media isn’t “behind” on the news story, they’re trying to control the arc of how it is covered. If more voters knew about the possible quid pro quo/conflict of interest in 2020, it may have swung enough voters in the Midwest to vote Trump.

Ding, ding, ding…….the media and the alphabet agencies in the Federal government have squelched this from day one to help make sure Trump lost.

Also makes sure Biden is “under the thumb” and does and says what he’s supposed to.