(09-24-2022 09:28 PM)Reggie Favre Wrote:  

(09-24-2022 06:09 PM)Thewavefan Wrote:  I predict a blowout, 63-7. We moved past USM years ago. Better market, better academics, better conference, brand name, I would argue we send better players to the NFL. From top to bottom we are just better and always have been. They held us back for years with their no market dragging our tv revenue down. So glad to only play them non conference now.

Someone give this guy some tissue

how 'bout them apples?

I didn't watch the game, so can someone tell me how the hell Tulane lost this game? The stats show complete domination by Tulane. Tulane had 26 first downs to USM's 13, and 451 yards to USM's 253. Looking at turnovers, Tulane was only -1 though.

(09-25-2022 08:03 AM)Volkmar Wrote:  I didn't watch the game, so can someone tell me how the hell Tulane lost this game? The stats show complete domination by Tulane. Tulane had 26 first downs to USM's 13, and 451 yards to USM's 253. Looking at turnovers, Tulane was only -1 though.

Stats win football games the same way markets do.

Bingo

(09-25-2022 08:14 AM)goldeneagle21 Wrote:  

(09-25-2022 08:03 AM)Volkmar Wrote:  I didn't watch the game, so can someone tell me how the hell Tulane lost this game? The stats show complete domination by Tulane. Tulane had 26 first downs to USM's 13, and 451 yards to USM's 253. Looking at turnovers, Tulane was only -1 though.

Stats win football games the same way markets do.

Doesn't answer the question at all.

(09-25-2022 12:24 AM)Noodles Wrote:  Hope we keep the series going.
Rivalries are the heart of college football. Go win the AAC this year.

This. Congratulations on the W — this one hurts but that’s life. Also congratulations on moving up to the Belt. That is a great move for Southern Miss and I know y’all will thrive there. Maybe sooner rather than later.

(09-25-2022 08:03 AM)Volkmar Wrote:  I didn't watch the game, so can someone tell me how the hell Tulane lost this game? The stats show complete domination by Tulane. Tulane had 26 first downs to USM's 13, and 451 yards to USM's 253. Looking at turnovers, Tulane was only -1 though.

Southern miss scored more points than Tulane. Hope this helps.

(09-24-2022 11:16 PM)rollgreenwave Wrote:  

(09-24-2022 11:01 PM)FairwayEagle Wrote:  

(09-24-2022 06:09 PM)Thewavefan Wrote:  I predict a blowout, 63-7. We moved past USM years ago. Better market, better academics, better conference, brand name, I would argue we send better players to the NFL. From top to bottom we are just better and always have been. They held us back for years with their no market dragging our tv revenue down. So glad to only play them non conference now.

With 2 for 1 tickets and cheap beer we still outdrew you in your own stadium. Again. We beat you in your home stadium. Again. At least we didn’t make you punt on 3rd down again. 24-9, your brand needs to catch up.

Talk all the smack you want, but in no world did you outdraw us. Southern Miss comfortably filled the visitors' corner of the stadium, which is 3 sections. The rest was Tulane fans, including 75% of the sideline behind Southern Miss, which is where the affordable season tickets are and is always mostly filled with Tulane fans. Our student section had about as many people in it as there were Southern Miss fans in the entire stadium, and that's not at all an exaggeration.

You can try the fake news schtick here… but there’s video evidence, Don. Your pathetic fans really showed up last night

https://twitter.com/jay_lump/status/1573...IGklkaLMMw

(09-25-2022 08:03 AM)Volkmar Wrote:  I didn't watch the game, so can someone tell me how the hell Tulane lost this game? The stats show complete domination by Tulane. Tulane had 26 first downs to USM's 13, and 451 yards to USM's 253. Looking at turnovers, Tulane was only -1 though.

Hidden in the stats is the turnovers on downs, blocked Punt and the blocked FG.

(09-25-2022 08:42 AM)USM3000 Wrote:  

(09-25-2022 08:03 AM)Volkmar Wrote:  I didn't watch the game, so can someone tell me how the hell Tulane lost this game? The stats show complete domination by Tulane. Tulane had 26 first downs to USM's 13, and 451 yards to USM's 253. Looking at turnovers, Tulane was only -1 though.

Hidden in the stats is the turnovers on downs, blocked Punt and the blocked FG.

Thanks. That helps.

(09-25-2022 08:29 AM)Volkmar Wrote:  

(09-25-2022 08:14 AM)goldeneagle21 Wrote:  

(09-25-2022 08:03 AM)Volkmar Wrote:  I didn't watch the game, so can someone tell me how the hell Tulane lost this game? The stats show complete domination by Tulane. Tulane had 26 first downs to USM's 13, and 451 yards to USM's 253. Looking at turnovers, Tulane was only -1 though.

Stats win football games the same way markets do.

Doesn't answer the question at all.

Southern Miss scored on a pick six, and also recovered a blocked punt on the Tulane 25-yd. line to set up a FG. So that’s 10 points right there. Also, Tulane suffered a blocked FG and missed another FG. Potential 6 points there.

I admit, when we jumped out to a 14-0 lead early in the 2nd Q, I turned it off and did other things for a while. When I tuned back in it was 17-17 and USM was kicking the FG to take the lead. Games like that happen sometimes.

(09-25-2022 08:48 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(09-25-2022 08:29 AM)Volkmar Wrote:  

(09-25-2022 08:14 AM)goldeneagle21 Wrote:  

(09-25-2022 08:03 AM)Volkmar Wrote:  I didn't watch the game, so can someone tell me how the hell Tulane lost this game? The stats show complete domination by Tulane. Tulane had 26 first downs to USM's 13, and 451 yards to USM's 253. Looking at turnovers, Tulane was only -1 though.

Stats win football games the same way markets do.

Doesn't answer the question at all.

Southern Miss scored on a pick six, and also recovered a blocked punt on the Tulane 25-yd. line to set up a FG. So that’s 10 points right there. Also, Tulane suffered a blocked FG and missed another FG. Potential 6 points there.

I admit, when we jumped out to a 14-0 lead early in the 2nd Q, I turned it off and did other things for a while. When I tuned back in it was 17-17 and USM was kicking the FG to take the lead. Games like that happen sometimes.

That helps also. Thanks. I check on the scores of the other games while I'm at our UTSA games, and I saw where you guys jumped out in front 14-0, and saw how the score progressed as the game continued. I didn't take a look at any stats for your game or others until I got home from our game late last night though, and the stats weren't what I expected.

Good morning

(09-25-2022 08:41 AM)GeagleFan Wrote:  

(09-24-2022 11:16 PM)rollgreenwave Wrote:  

(09-24-2022 11:01 PM)FairwayEagle Wrote:  

(09-24-2022 06:09 PM)Thewavefan Wrote:  I predict a blowout, 63-7. We moved past USM years ago. Better market, better academics, better conference, brand name, I would argue we send better players to the NFL. From top to bottom we are just better and always have been. They held us back for years with their no market dragging our tv revenue down. So glad to only play them non conference now.

With 2 for 1 tickets and cheap beer we still outdrew you in your own stadium. Again. We beat you in your home stadium. Again. At least we didn’t make you punt on 3rd down again. 24-9, your brand needs to catch up.

Talk all the smack you want, but in no world did you outdraw us. Southern Miss comfortably filled the visitors' corner of the stadium, which is 3 sections. The rest was Tulane fans, including 75% of the sideline behind Southern Miss, which is where the affordable season tickets are and is always mostly filled with Tulane fans. Our student section had about as many people in it as there were Southern Miss fans in the entire stadium, and that's not at all an exaggeration.

You can try the fake news schtick here… but there’s video evidence, Don. Your pathetic fans really showed up last night

Fixed the embedded for ya.

(09-25-2022 10:01 AM)TTT Wrote:  

(09-25-2022 08:41 AM)GeagleFan Wrote:  

(09-24-2022 11:16 PM)rollgreenwave Wrote:  

(09-24-2022 11:01 PM)FairwayEagle Wrote:  

(09-24-2022 06:09 PM)Thewavefan Wrote:  I predict a blowout, 63-7. We moved past USM years ago. Better market, better academics, better conference, brand name, I would argue we send better players to the NFL. From top to bottom we are just better and always have been. They held us back for years with their no market dragging our tv revenue down. So glad to only play them non conference now.

With 2 for 1 tickets and cheap beer we still outdrew you in your own stadium. Again. We beat you in your home stadium. Again. At least we didn’t make you punt on 3rd down again. 24-9, your brand needs to catch up.

Talk all the smack you want, but in no world did you outdraw us. Southern Miss comfortably filled the visitors' corner of the stadium, which is 3 sections. The rest was Tulane fans, including 75% of the sideline behind Southern Miss, which is where the affordable season tickets are and is always mostly filled with Tulane fans. Our student section had about as many people in it as there were Southern Miss fans in the entire stadium, and that's not at all an exaggeration.

You can try the fake news schtick here… but there’s video evidence, Don. Your pathetic fans really showed up last night

Fixed the embedded for ya.

You're sitting in the visitors section taking a low res video. Yes that proves there were more USM fans in the visitors section.

(09-24-2022 06:09 PM)Thewavefan Wrote:  I predict a blowout, 63-7. We moved past USM years ago. Better market, better academics, better conference, brand name, I would argue we send better players to the NFL. From top to bottom we are just better and always have been. They held us back for years with their no market dragging our tv revenue down. So glad to only play them non conference now.

If y’all can figure out how to parlay those better academics into some play-calling, you might have a chance in these games.

WTF Tulane!!! You had one job........

(09-25-2022 10:35 AM)HiddenDragon Wrote:  WTF Tulane!!! You had one job........

LOL, UAB is not even an AAC member and has done very little of note to warrant your spurious accusation. As a Tiger fan, I worry more about playing Tulane than UAB.

Know your lane and stay in it until UAB does something worthy of acclaim other than mere survival.

(09-25-2022 12:09 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  

(09-25-2022 10:35 AM)HiddenDragon Wrote:  WTF Tulane!!! You had one job........

LOL, UAB is not even an AAC member and has done very little of note to warrant your spurious accusation. As a a Tiger fan, I worry more about playing Tulane than UAB.

Know your lane and stay in it until UAB does something worthy of acclaim other than mere survival.

In UAB's defense, they lost to USM in their first nine meetings, but have since beaten them in 8 of their last 10 going back to 2009. UAB is also 45-21 since 2017. I'd say that's pretty good. They're also 6-5 against Tulane, including a win over Tulane last year. For that matter, UAB is also 10-5 against Memphis all-time. No, they're not in the AAC yet, but they will be next year, and maybe you should worry a little more about playing them than you do right now.

(09-25-2022 08:48 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(09-25-2022 08:29 AM)Volkmar Wrote:  

(09-25-2022 08:14 AM)goldeneagle21 Wrote:  

(09-25-2022 08:03 AM)Volkmar Wrote:  I didn't watch the game, so can someone tell me how the hell Tulane lost this game? The stats show complete domination by Tulane. Tulane had 26 first downs to USM's 13, and 451 yards to USM's 253. Looking at turnovers, Tulane was only -1 though.

Stats win football games the same way markets do.

Doesn't answer the question at all.

Southern Miss scored on a pick six, and also recovered a blocked punt on the Tulane 25-yd. line to set up a FG. So that’s 10 points right there. Also, Tulane suffered a blocked FG and missed another FG. Potential 6 points there.

I admit, when we jumped out to a 14-0 lead early in the 2nd Q, I turned it off and did other things for a while. When I tuned back in it was 17-17 and USM was kicking the FG to take the lead. Games like that happen sometimes.

Middle of the 1st qtr i thought our favorite greenie would be correct. The chip on our shoulder that has been missing for a decade is starting to return. Fritz appears to be a class act