Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
News WSJ: FBI took 11 sets of classified docs including some at highest classification
Author Message
shere khan Offline
Southerner
*

Posts: 60,883
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 7603
I Root For: Tulane
Location: Teh transfer portal
Post: #81
RE: WSJ: FBI took 11 sets of classified docs including some at highest classification
(08-12-2022 10:31 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  
(08-12-2022 10:23 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  
(08-12-2022 10:17 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  
(08-12-2022 10:07 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(08-12-2022 10:04 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  So again top secret is the highest classification level thank you for agreeing with the title of the post.

But not the highest level of access. Both TS-Crypto and TS-SIOP/ESI would indicate materials that possession of a TS would not be sufficient to gain access. TS but not TS-SIOP/ESI, for example, did not get access to nuke stuff.

Highest level of access is not what I have been arguing obviously, highest level of classification is the issue here.

Since we have diverted our attention down this rabbit hole, what difference does it make? Trump didn’t take anything after leaving office. He didn’t pack the boxes. The FBI whizzes new what he had all along.

Now for the future. Maybe Trump gets re-elected. How you turds gonna take it when his DOJ starts raiding every democrat they don’t like. You gonna make all these same arguments? You see, you liberals can’t see past your nose. Payback will be hell.

*Knew, and there must be a reason why he is being investigated and not the people who packed the boxes, maybe he directed the people to pack the ****.

The reason is democrats are authoritarian jack booted filth.
08-12-2022 11:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TexanMark Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 25,710
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 1331
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Post: #82
RE: WSJ: FBI took 11 sets of classified docs including some at highest classification
(08-12-2022 10:01 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  
(08-12-2022 09:38 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  
(08-12-2022 09:13 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  Menses, hate to be the one that tells you this, but there are many classifications of clearance above TS/SCI.

I held TS/SCI and don't even know what is at the top, nor do I need to know. So please change your thread title to reflect what was held at MagoLar was NOT the HIGHEST classification, as that is not factually correct.

"The highest security classification. "Top Secret shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause 'exceptionally grave damage' to the National Security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe."[26] As of 2019, around 1.25 million individuals have Top Secret clearance.[31]"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classifi...ification.
Wikipedia proves you wrong, go sit in shame in the corner.

Yeah, let's play. At the TS level, things are compartmentalized. Need to know is much more important, and designations after that TS clearance matter as to what and why someone would have access. My area was signals intelligence , and I had no reason to know more at this level than what was required of my job description.

So you can go sit in the corner and stroke your pud until it is blue, for all I care. You know nothing, as you are nothing. Piss off.

Yup...I had a TS/SCI when I was in SpecOps. It was very compartmentalized...There were other categories out there.
08-12-2022 11:35 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 44,881
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2886
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #83
RE: WSJ: FBI took 11 sets of classified docs including some at highest classification
(08-12-2022 10:20 PM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  You guys still in the denial section or have you moved on the MAGA’d final stage, anger, yet? What government building are you going to storm and kill cops in this time? And don’t say the Cincinnati FBI building, y’all tried that already.

Lol. Another mental midget. You do know no cops were “killed” on Jan 6th. The only person “killed” was a rioter—who was an unarmed 110 pound women shot by a six-foot-2 250 pound capitol policeman (who expressed a hatred of Trump supporters on Facebook) who could think of no other way to stop a women half his size.
(This post was last modified: 08-12-2022 11:54 PM by Attackcoog.)
08-12-2022 11:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,892
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3317
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #84
RE: WSJ: FBI took 11 sets of classified docs including some at highest classification
(08-12-2022 11:52 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  
(08-12-2022 10:20 PM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  You guys still in the denial section or have you moved on the MAGA’d final stage, anger, yet? What government building are you going to storm and kill cops in this time? And don’t say the Cincinnati FBI building, y’all tried that already.

Lol. Another mental midget. You do know no cops were “killed” on Jan 6th. The only person “killed” was a rioter—who was an unarmed 110 pound women shot by a six-foot-2 250 pound capitol policeman (who expressed a hatred of Trump supporters on Facebook) who could think of no other way to stop a women half his size.

Well one other person who was not a rioter was killed. Reports are that police pushed back protestors and people fell on her and the police refused to let people help her.
08-13-2022 07:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread:


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.